切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 462 -465. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.05.015

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术13例临床分析
梁嘉毅1, 张旭峰1, 何晓1, 谢斌辉1, 刘清泉1,()   
  1. 1. 341000 江西省赣州市,赣南医学院第一附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-13 出版日期:2020-10-10
  • 通信作者: 刘清泉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区项目(81760496); 江西省自然科学基金青年项目(20192BAB215030)

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical analysis of 13 cases

Jiayi Liang1, Xufeng Zhang1, Xiao He1, Binhui Xie1, Qingquan Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China
  • Received:2020-05-13 Published:2020-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Qingquan Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Qingquan, Email:
引用本文:

梁嘉毅, 张旭峰, 何晓, 谢斌辉, 刘清泉. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术13例临床分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(05): 462-465.

Jiayi Liang, Xufeng Zhang, Xiao He, Binhui Xie, Qingquan Liu. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical analysis of 13 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(05): 462-465.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)治疗壶腹周围癌的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年7月至2019年7月在赣南医学院第一附属医院行LPD的13例壶腹周围癌患者临床资料。其中男7例,女6例;年龄36~60岁,中位年龄57岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。观察患者围手术期情况。

结果

13例患者中11例接受标准LPD,2例因腔镜下手术困难中转开腹。手术时间中位数为523(487~577)min,术中出血量320(180~430)ml,术后住院时间32(22~53) d,患者总治疗费用7.6(4.9~17.7)万元。术后6例患者出现并发症,其中胰瘘3例,胆漏3例,腹腔内出血3例,腹腔积液2例,合并两种并发症1例,合并3种并发症2例,均经保守治疗痊愈。术后病理学检查结果显示,胆总管下段癌4例,十二指肠乳头癌4例,壶腹部周围癌2例,胰头癌2例,胰腺钩突腺癌1例。

结论

与传统开腹PD相比,行LPD治疗壶腹周围癌具有微创、手术切口恢复快等优势。LPD难度较大,对施术者技术要求高,应加强对术者的培训学习,以降低术后并发症发生率。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in the treatment of periampullary carcinoma.

Methods

Clinical data of 13 patients with periampullary carcinoma who underwent LPD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from July 2016 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 7 patients were male and 6 female, aged 36-60 years with a median age of 57 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The perioperative conditions of all patients were observed.

Results

Among 13 patients, 11 cases received standard LPD, and 2 patients were converted to open surgery for the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery. The median operation time was 523(487-577) min, intraoperative blood loss was 320(180-430) ml, the length of postoperative hospital stay was 32(22-53) d and the total medical expense was 76(49-177) thousand yuan. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 cases, including 3 cases of pancreatic fistula, 3 cases of bile leakage, 3 cases of intraperitoneal hemorrhage, 2 cases of peritoneal effusion, 1 case with 2 complications and 2 cases with 3 complications. The patients were all cured by conservative treatments. Postoperative pathological examination showed that 4 patients were diagnosed with the lower common bile duct carcinoma, 4 cases of duodenal papillary carcinoma, 2 cases of periampullary carcinoma, 2 cases of pancreatic head carcinoma and 1 case of pancreatic uncinate process adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions

Compared with traditional open PD, LPD for periampullary carcinoma has the advantages of minimally invasive and quick recovery of incision. LPD is a procedure with high difficulty and high level techniques are required. Technical training for the surgeon should be increased to decrease the incidence of postoperative complications.

[1]
Khatkov I, Izrailov R, Tyutyunnik P, et al. One hundred and forty five total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies: a single centre experience[J]. Pancreatology, 2017, 17(6):936-942.
[2]
Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection: a comparison of laparoscopic versus open approaches[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 19(1):189-194.
[3]
Lee CS, Kim EY, You YK, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and borderline malignant periampullary disease compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2018, 403(5): 591-597.
[4]
Chapman BC, Gajdos C, Hosokawa P, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5):2239-2248.
[5]
汪德秀,杨文军.胰十二指肠切除术对胰头癌伴壶腹周围癌患者疗效及远期生存率的影响[J].数理医药学杂志,2017, 30(12): 1742-1745.
[6]
Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 1994, 8(5):408-410.
[7]
戴梦华,蔺晨.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除手术发展之我见[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2016, 21(8): 573-577.
[8]
卢榜裕,陆文奇,蔡小勇,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除治疗十二指肠乳头癌一例报告[J].中国微创外科杂,2003, 3(3): 197-198.
[9]
洪德飞.胰消化道重建个体化选择策略[J].外科理论与实践,2015, 20(6):468-471.
[10]
金巍巍,张苗尊,鲁超,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术125例报告[C]//2015浙江省肿瘤外科学术年会暨首届钱江国际肿瘤外科高峰论坛论文集,杭州,2015.杭州:浙江省医学会肿瘤外科分会,2015:83-84.
[11]
陈鹏,周斌,孙传东,等.微创与开放胰十二指肠切除术围手术期预后的初步比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018, 23(9):700-704.
[12]
王哲元,张亚武,权柯.腹腔镜与传统手术治疗胆总管下段癌的临床疗效对比[J].医学研究杂志,2017, 46(12):143-148.
[13]
Dokmak S, Ftériche FS, Aussilhou B, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy should not be routine for resection of periampullary tumors[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(5):831-838.
[14]
王志龙,蒋厚文.开腹与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果对比分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2019, 13(20):6-7.
[15]
Feng JW, Yang XH, Liu CW, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open approach in treating gallbladder cancer[J]. J Surg Res, 2019(234):269-276.
[16]
洪德飞.腹腔镜与达芬奇机器人胰十二指肠切除术进展[J].浙江医学,2018, 40(19):2093-2096.
[17]
Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched study from a national cohort of patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(1):151-157.
[18]
Ausania F, Landi F, Martínez-Pérez A, et al. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. HPB, 2019, 21(12):1613-1620.
[19]
Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours[J]. Br J Surg, 2017, 104(11):1443-1450.
[20]
王楚斯,陈署贤,钟跃思,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术14例初步体会[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2019, 8(4):301-305.
[21]
段小辉,毛先海,蒋波,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术治疗远端胆管癌的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志,2018, 17(3):304-309.
[22]
胡仁健,秦红军,程刚,等.腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术36例[J]. 武警医学,2019, 30(8):709-711.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[13] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[14] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[15] 汤海琴, 郭秀枝, 朱晓素, 赵世娣. “隧道法”腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术的临床安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-677.
阅读次数
全文


摘要