切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 227 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2015.04.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肿瘤直径与肝细胞癌肝切除患者预后的关系
周延岩1, 许鑫森1, 王志鑫1, 苗润晨1, 陈伟1, 万永1, 吕毅1, 刘昌1,()   
  1. 1. 710061 西安交通大学第一附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-07 出版日期:2015-08-10
  • 通信作者: 刘昌
  • 基金资助:
    西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院七年制科研基金(12ZD03)

Association between tumor size and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy

Yanyan Zhou1, Xinsen Xu1, Zhixin Wang1, Runchen Miao1, Wei Chen1, Yong Wan1, Yi Lyu1, Chang Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2015-04-07 Published:2015-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Chang Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Chang, Email:
引用本文:

周延岩, 许鑫森, 王志鑫, 苗润晨, 陈伟, 万永, 吕毅, 刘昌. 肿瘤直径与肝细胞癌肝切除患者预后的关系[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 04(04): 227-231.

Yanyan Zhou, Xinsen Xu, Zhixin Wang, Runchen Miao, Wei Chen, Yong Wan, Yi Lyu, Chang Liu. Association between tumor size and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(04): 227-231.

目的

探讨肿瘤直径与肝细胞癌(肝癌)肝切除患者预后的关系。

方法

回顾性分析2002年12月至2011年12月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行根治性肝切除并经病理学检查证实为肝癌的172例患者临床资料。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男139例,女33例;年龄≤55岁98例,>55岁74例。绘制患者术后生存时间和肿瘤直径关系的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定肿瘤直径界值为5.75 cm。根据最佳界值将患者分为小肝癌组(肿瘤直径< 5.75 cm,85例)和大肝癌组(肿瘤直径≥5.75 cm,87例)。分析肿瘤直径与临床病理学参数关系。比较两组患者中位生存期、累积生存率、无瘤生存率。将临床病理学参数纳入影响患者生存预后的因素进行独立危险因素分析。肿瘤直径与临床病理学参数关系采用χ2检验,生存预后分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。单因素和多因素分析采用Cox比例风险模型。

结果

肿瘤直径与患者术前AFP、肿瘤数目、TNM分期有关(χ2=13.272,9.378,7.311;P<0.05)。大肝癌组的中位生存期为24个月,中位复发时间9个月;小肝癌组相应为39、37个月。大肝癌组的1、3、5年累积生存率分别为65.5%、36.0%、22.9%,小肝癌组相应为89.5%、76.3%、72.5%,大肝癌组的总体生存率明显低于小肝癌组(χ2=33.644,P<0.05)。大肝癌组的1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为44.7%、25.5%、21.9%,小肝癌组相应为84.8%、67.8%、66.3%,大肝癌组的无瘤生存率明显低于小肝癌组(χ2=38.908,P<0.05)。术前Plt≥155×109/L、肿瘤直径>5.75 cm和TNM分期晚期是影响肝癌患者术后预后的独立危险因素(HR=1.588,3.066,2.029;P<0.05)。

结论

肿瘤直径是影响肝癌肝切除术患者预后的独立危险因素,肿瘤直径>5.75 cm患者预后差。

Objective

To investigate the association between tumor size and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 172 patients undergoing radical hepatectomy and diagnosed as HCC by pathological examination in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between December 2002 and December 2011 were retrospectively studied. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. Among the 172 patients, 139 were males and 33 were females; 98 were with age ≤55 years old and 74 were with age >55 years old. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the relationship between postoperative survival time and tumor size was drawn, and the cut-off value for tumor size was determined at 5.75 cm. According to the best cut-off value, the patients were divided into the small HCC group (tumor size < 5.75 cm, n=85) and huge HCC group (tumor size≥5.75 cm, n=87). The relationship between tumor size and clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed, and the median survival time, cumulative survival rate and disease free survival rate of two groups were compared. The clinicopathologic parameters were included as the factors influencing the survival and prognosis of patients, and independent risk factor analysis was performed. The relationship between tumor size and clinicopathologic parameters was analyzed using Chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were used for survival and prognosis analysis. Cox proportional hazard model was used for univariate analysis and multivariate analysis.

Results

Tumor size was associated with the preoperative AFP, number of tumors and TNM staging (χ2=13.272, 9.378, 7.311; P<0.05). The median survival time and the median recurrence time for the huge HCC group were 24 months and 9 months respectively and were 39 months and 37 months for the small HCC group. The 1-, 3-, 5-year cumulative survival rate for the huge HCC group were 65.5%, 36.0%, 22.9% respectively and were 89.5%, 76.3%, 72.5% respectively for the small HCC group. The overall survival of the huge HCC group was lower than that of small HCC group (χ2=33.644, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, 5-year disease free survival rate for the huge HCC group were 44.7%, 25.5%, 21.9% respectively and were 84.8%, 67.8%, 66.3% respectively for the small HCC group. The disease free survival rate of huge HCC group was lower than that of small HCC group (χ2=38.908, P<0.05). Preoperative platelets count (Plt)≥155×109/L, tumor size > 5.75 cm and advanced stage of TNM were the independent risk factors influencing the postoperative prognosis of HCC patients (HR=1.588, 3.066, 2.029; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Tumor size is the independent risk factor influencing the prognosis of HCC patients after hepatectomy. The prognosis of patients with tumor size > 5.75 cm is poor.

图1 肝癌患者术后生存时间和肿瘤直径关系的ROC曲线图
表1 肿瘤直径与肝癌患者临床病理学参数关系(例)
图2 大肝癌组与小肝癌组的累积生存率和无瘤生存率的Kaplan-Meier曲线
[1]
El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2007, 132(7): 2557-2576.
[2]
Verhoef C, de Man RA, Zondervan PE, et al. Good outcomes after resection of large hepatocellular carcinoma in the non-cirrhotic liver[J]. Dig Surg, 2004, 21(5/6):380-386.
[3]
Young AL, Malik HZ, Abu-Hilal M, et al. Large hepatocellular carcinoma: time to stop preoperative biopsy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 205(3):453-462.
[4]
Rahbari NN, Mehrabi A, Mollberg NM, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: current management and perspectives for the future[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(3):453-469.
[5]
Li Y, Tian B, Yang J, et al. Stepwise metastatic human hepatocellular carcinoma cell model system with multiple metastatic potentials established through consecutive in vivo selection and studies on metastatic characteristics[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2004, 130(8): 460-468.
[6]
Ng KK, Vauthey JN, Pawlik TM, et al. Is hepatic resection for large or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma justified? results from a multi-institutional database[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2005, 12(5):364-373.
[7]
Yamashita Y, Taketomi A, Shirabe K, et al. Outcomes of hepatic resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ 10 cm in diameter)[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2011, 104(3): 292-298.
[8]
Choi GH, Han DH, Kim DH, et al. Outcome after curative resection for a huge (>or=10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma and prognostic significance of gross tumor classification[J]. Am J Surg, 2009, 198(5):693-701.
[9]
Pawlik TM, Delman KA, Vauthey JN, et al. Tumor size predicts vascular invasion and histologic grade: implications for selection of surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Liver Transpl, 2005, 11(9): 1086-1092.
[10]
徐成,李敬东,石刚,等.原发性肝细胞癌行根治性肝切除术后复发的预后因素分析[J].中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(11): 806-811.
[11]
Tang ZY, Ye SL, Liu YK, et al. A decade's studies on metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2004, 130(4): 187-196.
[12]
Wang RY, Chen L, Chen HY, et al. MUC15 inhibits dimerization of EGFR and PI3K-AKT signaling and is associated with aggressive hepatocellular carcinomas in patients[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 145(6): 1436-1448, e1-12.
[13]
El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 365(12): 1118-1127.
[14]
Toro A, Ardiri A, Mannino M, et al. Effect of pre- and post-treatment α-fetoprotein levels and tumor size on survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by resection, transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation: a retrospective study[J]. BMC Surg, 2014(14): 40.
[15]
Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, et al. A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(6): 1037-1049.
[16]
Liu C, Duan LG, Lu WS, et al. Prognosis evaluation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of BCLC, TNM and Hangzhou criteria staging systems[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e103228.
[17]
Hubert C, Sempoux C, Rahier J, et al. Prognostic risk factors of survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2007, 54(78):1791-1797.
[1] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[2] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[3] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[9] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要