切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (05) : 301 -305. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2015.05.011

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝功能不同患者靶控输注丙泊酚的药效反应
潘婧儒1, 池信锦1,(), 高婉菱1, 周少丽1, 黑子清1   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-08 出版日期:2015-10-10
  • 通信作者: 池信锦
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81471892); 广东省自然科学基金(2014A030313199)

Pharmacodynamic effect of propofol by target controlled infusion in patients with different liver functions

Jingru Pan1, Xinjin Chi1,(), Wanling Gao1, Shaoli Zhou1, Ziqing Hei1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2015-06-08 Published:2015-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Xinjin Chi
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Chi Xinjin, Email:
引用本文:

潘婧儒, 池信锦, 高婉菱, 周少丽, 黑子清. 肝功能不同患者靶控输注丙泊酚的药效反应[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 04(05): 301-305.

Jingru Pan, Xinjin Chi, Wanling Gao, Shaoli Zhou, Ziqing Hei. Pharmacodynamic effect of propofol by target controlled infusion in patients with different liver functions[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(05): 301-305.

目的

观察外科手术中肝功能不同患者靶控输注丙泊酚的药效反应。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2013年6月至2014年6月在中山大学附属第三医院接受气管插管全身麻醉下开腹手术的60例患者。其中男51例,女9例;年龄18~70岁,中位年龄48岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据肝功能Child-Pugh分级将患者分为4组:肝功能正常组(N组)7例,肝功能分级A级组(A组)21例,B级组(B组)20例,C级组(C组)12例。术中所有患者采用靶控输注丙泊酚,目标血药浓度3 μg/ml。记录4组患者在麻醉诱导期(靶控输注30 min内)脑电双频指数(BIS)值及血流动力学指标,比较各组BIS下降至40以下患者的百分率及血流动力学事件发生率。率的比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

麻醉诱导期,4组患者的BIS随时间逐渐下降,20 min时基本稳定。N、A、B、C组BIS下降至40以下的百分率分别为9.2%、11.2%、20.4%、26.8%,C组明显高于N组和A组(χ2=12.28,18.81;P<0.05)。麻醉诱导期,N、A、B、C组低血压发生频率分别为0、5%、8%、16%,C组明显高于N、A、B组(P<0.0001,P<0.0001,P=0.0195)。N、A、B、C组心动过缓发生频率分别为15%、5%、3%、0,C组明显低于N、A、B组(P<0.0001,P=0.0003,P=0.0085)。

结论

采用丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉诱导时,肝功能不同患者麻醉深度呈现相似的变化趋势,但重度肝功能不全患者更易出现脑电波暴发性抑制和低血压。

Objective

To observe the pharmacodynamic effect of propofol by target controlled infusion (TCI) in patients with different liver functions during surgery.

Methods

Sixty patients undergoing laparotomy under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between June 2013 and June 2014 were enrolled in this prospective study. Among the 60 patients, 51 were males and 9 were females with the age ranging from 18 to 70 years old and the median of 48 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the Child-Pugh liver function grading, the normal liver function group (N group, n=7), grade A group (A group, n=21), grade B group (B group, n=20) and grade C group (C group, n=12). TCI propofol were given to all patients during the operation with the target plasma concentration of 3 μg/ml. Bispectral index (BIS) and hemodynamic parameters of the 4 groups during the anesthesia induction period (within 30 min of TCI) were recorded. The percentage of patients with BIS dropped below 40 and the incidence of hemodynamic events in each group were compared. The comparison was conducted using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

During the anesthesia induction period, BIS of the 4 groups dropped with time and was stable at 20 min. The percentage of patients with BIS below 40 in N, A, B and C group was respectively 9.2%, 11.2%, 20.4% and 26.8%, C group was significantly higher than N and A group (χ2=12.28, 18.81; P<0.05). During the anesthesia induction period, the incidence of hypotension in N, A, B and C group was respectively 0, 5%, 8% and 16%, C group was significantly higher than N, A and B group (P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P=0.0195). The incidence of bradycardia in N, A, B and C group was respectively 15%, 5%, 3% and 0, C group was significantly lower than N, A and B group (P<0.0001, P=0.0003, P=0.0085).

Conclusions

Similar trends of change in anesthesia depth are observed in patients with different liver function when using propofol TCI, but patients with severe hepatic dysfunction may more likely to develop fulminant suppression of brain wave and hypotension.

表1 四组开腹手术患者一般情况比较
图1 麻醉诱导期四组开腹手术患者BIS变化
表2 四组开腹手术患者血流动力学事件发生率
表3 四组开腹手术患者血流动力学事件发生频率
[1]
Cortínez LI, De la Fuente N, Eleveld DJ, et a1. Performance of propofol target-controlled infusion models in the obese: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis[J]. Anesth Analg, 2014, 119(2): 302-310.
[2]
Cowley NJ, Hutton P, Clutton-Brock TH. Assessment of the performance of the Marsh model in effect site mode for target controlled infusion of propofol during the maintenance phase of general anaesthesia in an unselected population of neurosurgical patients[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2013, 30(10): 627-632.
[3]
贾瑞芳,王巧恒,周淑珍,等.靶控输注舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚对诱导期血流动力学的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2009, 25(10): 842-844.
[4]
Muñoz HR, Cortínez LI, Ibacache ME, et a1. Effect site concentrations of propofol producing hypnosis in children and adults: comparison using the bispectral index[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006, 50(7): 882-887.
[5]
Coskun D, Gunaydin B, Tas A, et al. A comparison of three different target-controlled remifentanil infusion rates during target-controlled propofol infusion for oocyte retrieval[J]. Clinics, 2011, 66(5):811-815.
[6]
潘伟,冯雪辛,刘靖,等.靶控输注与间断静脉注射丙泊酚用于经皮微波消融治疗肝癌的麻醉效果比较[J].北京医学,2011, 33(8): 612-614.
[7]
Hu LG, Pan JH, Li J, et al. Effects of different doses of sufentanil and remifentanil combined with propofol in target-controlled infusion on stress reaction in elderly patients[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2013, 5(3): 807-812.
[8]
黄肇敏,欧阳葆怡,黄焕森.血浆或效应室靶浓度靶控输注丙泊酚诱导对中青年患者血流动力学的影响[J]. 广东医学,2014, 35(1): 91-93.
[9]
Han SS, Do SH, Kim TH, et al. Stepwise tapering of remifentanil at the end of surgery decreased postoperative pain and the need of rescue analgesics after thyroidectomy[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2015 (15): 46.
[10]
Imagawa A, Hata H, Nakatsu M, et al. A target-controlled infusion system with bispectral index monitoring of propofol sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2015, 3(1): E2-6.
[11]
徐雅洁,王荣英,魏娜.舒芬太尼复合丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉对老年患者意识和苏醒的影响[J].实用医院临床杂志,2014, 11(6): 77-79.
[12]
Biswas I, Mathew PJ, Singh RS, et al. Evaluation of closed-loop anesthesia delivery for propofol anesthesia in pediatric cardiac surgery[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2013, 23(12): 1145-1152.
[13]
王煜,赵军,张玲,等.闭环靶控输注下不同镇静麻醉深度对围术期血流动力学的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2014, 30(22): 3592-3594.
[14]
Shalbaf R, Behnam H, Jelveh Moghadam H. Monitoring depth of anesthesia using combination of EEG measure and hemodynamic variables[J]. Cogn Neurodyn, 2015, 9(1): 41-51.
[15]
Penteado KR, Coelho JC, Parolin MB, et al. The influence of end-stage liver disease and liver transplantation on thyroid hormones[J]. Arq Gastroenterol, 2015, 52(2): 124-128.
[16]
Weismüller TJ, Lerch C, Evangelidou E, et al. A pocket guide to identify patients at risk for chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation[J]. Transpl Int, 2015, 28(5): 519-528.
[17]
李小鹏,余珊珊,李路,等.肝硬化患者左心功能变化与终末期肝病模型评分的相关性研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2015, 35(4): 557-561.
[18]
de Lima DC, Ribeiro HS, Cristina R, et al. Functional status and heart rate variability in end-stage liver disease patients: association with nutritional status[J]. Nutrition, 2015, 31(7/8): 971-974.
[19]
Karwacki Z, Niewiadomski S, Rzaska M, et al. The effect of bispectral index monitoring on anaesthetic requirements in target-controlled infusion for lumbar microdiscectomy[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2014, 46(4): 284-288.
[20]
Huang HH, Wu CY, Lin FS, et al. The Alaris auditory evoked potential monitor as an indicator of seizure inducibility and duration during electroconvulsive therapy: an observational study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2014(14): 34.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[3] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[4] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[5] 朱明, 童国煜, 赵海腾, 钟量, 邹翔宇, 吴少峰, 张轶男. 腹腔镜在减少儿童隐匿性腹股沟斜疝与鞘膜积液二次手术的意义[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 457-460.
[6] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[7] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[8] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[9] 党情超, 魏星, 詹必伟, 何振. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 598-602.
[10] 周顺, 赵素侠, 时静静, 吴双双, 吴圆圆, 李金山. 丙泊酚-舒芬太尼复合七氟烷吸入对小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的麻醉效果及安全性[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 603-607.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[13] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 边震, 宋绍永, 杨国旺, 范凤尾, 黄庆红, 李健, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期危机状况的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 499-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要