切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 193 -196. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.03.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

5 771例日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和经济效益分析
赵森峰1, 李向军1, 豆松萌1, 韩文有1, 刘博1,()   
  1. 1. 100853 北京,中国人民解放军总医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-19 出版日期:2018-06-10
  • 通信作者: 刘博

Analysis of safety and economic benefit of 5 771 patients undergoing day surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Senfeng Zhao1, Xiangjun Li1, Songmeng Dou1, Wenyou Han1, Bo Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
  • Received:2018-03-19 Published:2018-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Bo Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Bo, Email:
引用本文:

赵森峰, 李向军, 豆松萌, 韩文有, 刘博. 5 771例日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性和经济效益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(03): 193-196.

Senfeng Zhao, Xiangjun Li, Songmeng Dou, Wenyou Han, Bo Liu. Analysis of safety and economic benefit of 5 771 patients undergoing day surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(03): 193-196.

目的

探讨日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC/DS)的安全性和经济效益。

方法

回顾性分析2009年11月至2017年1月在中国人民解放军总医院5 771例行LC/DS及2 450例行常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理规定。LC/DS组患者男2 204例,女3 567例;平均年龄(51±13)岁;接受LC/DS手术模式。CLC组患者男992例,女1 458例;年龄(51±13)岁。两组住院时间、医疗总费用比较采用Mann-Whitney检验,中转开腹率、术后并发症、术后24 h出院率、30 d再入院率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

LC/DS组患者中转开腹率、30 d再入院率分别为0.36%、0.49%,CLC组相应为0.16%、0.49%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.83,0.00;P>0.05)。LC/DS组患者术后24 h出院率83.34%,明显高于CLC组的49.22%(χ2=1 020.30,P<0.05);而术后并发症发生率6.59%,明显低于CLC组的14.56%(χ2=130.19,P<0.05)。LC/DS组患者住院时间、医疗总费用分别为[3.0(1.0~33.0)] d、[0.98(0.56~4.59)]万元,明显低于CLC组的[5.0(1.0~36.0)] d、[1.40(0.38~2.95)]万元(Z=-17.33,-45.40;P<0.05)。

结论

LC/DS是安全和有效的,可以减少患者术后并发症发生率,缩短患者住院时间,降低医疗费用。

Objective

To explore the safety and economic benefits of day surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC/DS).

Methods

Clinical data of 5 771 patients undergoing LC/DS and 2 450 undergoing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) in PLA General Hospital from November 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. In LC/DS group, there were 2 204 males and 3 567 females with the average age of (51±13) years old. In CLC group, there were 992 males and 1 458 females with the average age of (51±13) years old. The hospitalization time and total medical expenses of two groups were compared by Mann-Whitney test. The ratio of conversion to laparotomy, postoperative complication, postoperative 24-hour discharge rate, and 30-day readmission rate were compared by Chi-square test.

Results

The ratio of conversion to laparotomy and 30-day readmission rate was respectively 0.36%, 0.49% in LC/DS group and 0.16%, 0.49% in CLC group, and no significant difference were observed (χ2=2.83, 0.00; P>0.05). The postoperative 24-hour discharge rate in LC/DS Group was 83.34%, significantly higher than 49.22% in CLC group (χ2=1 020.30, P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate in LC/DS group was 6.59%, significantly lower than 14.56% in CLC group (χ2=130.19, P<0.05). The hospitalization time and total medical expenses in LC/DS group was respectively [3.0(1.0-33.0)] d and [0.98(0.56-4.59)] million RMB, significantly lower than [5.0(1.0-36.0)] d and [1.40(0.38-2.95)] million RMB in CLC group (Z=-17.33,-45.40; P<0.05).

Conclusions

LC/DS is safe and effective. It can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, shorten the hospitalization time and reduce the hospitalization cost of patients.

表1 LC/DS组和CLC组患者医疗费[万元,MQR)]
[1]
Al-Omani S, Almodhaiberi H, Ali B, et al. Feasibility and safety of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution 5-year experience of 1140 cases[J]. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2015, 19(3):109-112.
[2]
McGillicuddy JW, Villar JJ, Rohan VS, et al. Is cirrhosisa contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy?[J]. Am Surg, 2015, 81(1):52-55.
[3]
安永德,李新源,郭亚民,等.腹腔镜下胆囊切除术中转开腹74例临床分析[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(10):758-759.
[4]
Rao A, Polanco A, Qiu S, et al. Safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: analysis of 15,248 patients using the NSQIP database[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2013, 217(6):1038-1043.
[5]
Planells Roig M, Garcia Espinosa R, Cervera Delagdo M, et al. Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. a cohort study of 1, 600 consecutive cases[J]. Cir Esp, 2013, 91(3):156-162.
[6]
Cao J, Liu B, Li X, et al. Analysis of delayed discharge after day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 40:33-37.
[7]
北京市统计局.北京市职工平均工资(1995年-2016年)[EB/OL]. [2015-11-09].

URL    
[8]
Agarwal BB, Chintamani, Agarwal S. Fast track surgery-minimizing side effects of surgery[J]. Indian J Surg, 2015, 77 Suppl 3:753-758.
[9]
江志伟,黎介寿.快速康复外科——优化的临床路径[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(1):12-13.
[10]
马洪升,蒋丽莎,刘洋,等.快速康复外科理念在日间手术中的实践[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2015,22(11):1384-1385.
[11]
刘博,李成刚,陈继业,等.日间手术腹腔镜胆囊切除1 240例社会和经济效益评价[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(8):2254-2257.
[12]
Gregori M, Miccini M, Biacchi D, et al. Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: safety and feasibility in obese patients[J]. Int J Surg, 2018(49):22-26.
[13]
Seleem MI, Gerges SS, Shreif KS, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure: is it safe?--an egyptian experience[J]. Saudi J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(4):277-279.
[14]
Lezana Pérez MÁ, Carreño Villarreal G, Lora Cumplido P, et al. Comparative study of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus management of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional hospital stay[J]. Cir Esp, 2013, 91(7):424-431.
[15]
Brescia A, Gasparrini M, Nigr G, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day surgery: feasibility and outcomes of the first 400 patients[J]. Surgeon, 2013, 11 Suppl 1:S14-18.
[16]
Shuying L, Xiao W, Peng L, et al. Preoperative intravenous parecoxib reduces length of stay on ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Int J Surg, 2014, 12(5):464-468.
[17]
Psaila J, Agrawal S, Fountain U, et al. Day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy: factors influencing same-day discharge[J]. World J Surg, 2008, 32(1):76-81.
[18]
李静,李咏梅. 医保患者日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术的费用分析[J]. 中国病案,2012,13(6):41-43.
[19]
沈火剑,李可为,季福,等. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床应用分析[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志,2011,23(1):43-45.
[20]
黄艳. 快速康复外科理念在日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术护理的应用及效果评价[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2017,8(27):181-182.
[1] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[2] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[3] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[4] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[5] 张建波, 东爱华. 不同腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效及并发症对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 693-696.
[6] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[7] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[8] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[9] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 193-199.
[10] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[11] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[12] 周后平, 袁源, 欧廷政, 李贝贝, 尚明铭, 姚本能, 宋新, 罗雪梅. 胆囊板Laennec膜间隙逆行分离联合Pringle法在困难胆囊LC术中应用(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 540-544.
[13] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[14] 陈婷婷, 江学良, 余佳丽, 柯剑林. 干细胞治疗炎症性肠病的安全性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[15] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
阅读次数
全文


摘要