切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 339 -343. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.04.014

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后严重并发症22例处理经验
刘希宁1, 张瑞波1, 康健忠1, 王万超1, 赵利1, 李晶1, 刘苹2, 曹立瀛1,()   
  1. 1. 063000 河北省唐山市,开滦总医院肝胆外科
    2. 063000 河北省唐山市,开滦总医院营养科
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-06 出版日期:2019-08-10
  • 通信作者: 曹立瀛
  • 基金资助:
    河北省卫生和计划生育委员会重点科技研究计划(20171426)

Experience of management of severe complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 patients

Xining Liu1, Ruibo Zhang1, Jianzhong Kang1, Wanchao Wang1, Li Zhao1, Jing Li1, Ping Liu2, Liying Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
    2. Department of Nutrition, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Received:2019-05-06 Published:2019-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Liying Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Liying, Email:
引用本文:

刘希宁, 张瑞波, 康健忠, 王万超, 赵利, 李晶, 刘苹, 曹立瀛. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术后严重并发症22例处理经验[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 08(04): 339-343.

Xining Liu, Ruibo Zhang, Jianzhong Kang, Wanchao Wang, Li Zhao, Jing Li, Ping Liu, Liying Cao. Experience of management of severe complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 22 patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(04): 339-343.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后严重并发症的处理方法。

方法

回顾性分析2012年9月至2017年11月开滦总医院收治的22例LC术后严重并发症患者临床资料。其中男8例,女14例;年龄47~88岁,中位年龄59岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。总结分析患者术后严重并发症的处理方法。

结果

3例术后出血,其中1例肝动脉损伤急诊开腹止血,2例胆囊动脉出血行介入栓塞治疗。6例胆漏,其中3例放置腹腔引流管,给予制动、禁饮食、抗炎、补液对症处理;急诊开腹引流2例,超声引导下穿刺引流1例。7例胆管损伤,其中放置腹腔引流管1例,开腹放置T管4例,行胆肠Roux-en-Y吻合1例,胆总管修补术1例。6例术后胆总管结石,其中中西医结合治疗1例,再次经腹腔镜手术治疗2例,ERCP检查取石3例。经积极恰当处理,患者均获痊愈。

结论

术前详细询问病史,术中熟悉解剖关系,选择恰当开腹时机,维护正常生理通道是LC术后发生严重并发症患者良好预后的关键。

Objective

To explore the treatments of severe complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Clinical data of 22 patients with severe complications after LC admitted to Kailuan General Hospital from September 2012 to November 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 8 patients were male and 14 female, aged 47-88 years with a median age of 59 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The treatments of severe postoperative complications were summarized and analyzed.

Results

3 cases suffered from hemorrhage after operation, 1 of them treated with emergent open hemostasis due to hepatic artery injury and 2 cases of gallbladder artery hemorrhage received interventional embolization. 6 cases developed bile leakage, 3 of them had abdominal drainage tube placed and received symptomatic treatments, such as immobilization, fasting and water deprivation, anti-inflammatory, and fluid infusion, 2 cases received emergent open drainage and 1 case underwent ultrasound-guided puncture drainage. 7 cases suffered from bile duct injury,1 of them had abdominal drainage tube placed, 4 cases had T tube placed through open surgery, 1 case underwent Roux-en-Y anastomosis and 1 case underwent repair of common bile duct. 6 cases suffered from postoperative choledocholithiasis. Among them, 1 case was treated with integrated therapy of traditional Chinese and western medicine, 2 cases underwent repeated laparoscopic surgery and 3 cases were treated with ERCP. After active and appropriate treatments, all patients were cured.

Conclusions

Explicit preoperative inquiry of medical history, well knowing the anatomical relations during operation, selecting the appropriate timing of open surgery and protecting the normal physiological channels are the key factors for well prognosis of patients with severe complications after LC.

[1]
CholeS Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative. Population-based cohort study of outcomes following cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(12):1704-1715.
[2]
Halbert C, Pagkratis S, Yang J, et al. Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(6): 2239-2243.
[3]
Lau KN, Sindram D, Agee N, et al. Bile duct injury after single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. JSLS, 2010, 14(4):587-591.
[4]
何德海,甘启祥,杨益森,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症的诊断和治疗[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2009, 16(8):661-663.
[5]
赵利锋,王钢,杨彦伟,等.腹腔引流在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用的体会[J].中国急救医学,2015, 38(z1):117-118.
[6]
张成,王羊,安东均.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性迷走胆管漏的预防及处理[J].中国微创外科杂志,2012, 12(1):40-42.
[7]
Spence LH, Schwartz S, Kaji AH, et al. Concurrent biliary disease increases the risk for conversion and bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis at a county teaching hospital[J]. Am Surg, 2017, 83(10):1024-1028.
[8]
Thompson CM, Saad NE, Quazi RR, et al. Management of iatrogenic bile duct injuries: role of the interventional radiologist[J]. Radiographics, 2013, 33(1):117-134.
[9]
袁德汉,陈应军,卫洪波,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术所致胆道损伤的相关危险因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2013, 19(5):492-495.
[10]
余少鸿,赵嵘,温小明.腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆道损伤的原因及处理[J/CD].中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版),2013, 6(6):447-449.
[11]
王怀志,苑军正,汪海,等.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后残余胆管结石原因分析及处理[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016, 10(2):179-180.
[12]
Georgiades CP, Mavromatis TN, Kourlaba GC, et al. Is inflammation a significant predictor of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(9): 1959-1964.
[13]
Cox MR, Budge JP, Eslick GD. Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(7): 2033-2038.
[14]
郭盖章.腹腔镜胆囊切除术并发症28例教训分析[J].肝胆外科杂志,2009, 17(6):451-452.
[15]
尹耀新,彭毅,熊沛,等.1 600例腹腔镜胆囊切除术无胆管损伤的临床体会[J].中国内镜杂志,2008, 14(6):649-651.
[16]
Vazquez RM. Common sense and common bile duct injury: common bile duct injury revisited[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(8):1743-1745.
[17]
Lau WY, Lai EC, Lau SH. Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2010, 80(1/2):75-81.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[9] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[10] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[11] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[12] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[13] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[14] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要