切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06) : 582 -586. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.06.018

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

EmprintTM微波消融系统在肝细胞癌治疗中的安全性及疗效
张小丹1, 叶火林1, 苏雅婷1, 曾庆劲1, 贺需旗1, 李凯1, 郑荣琴1, 许尔蛟2,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院超声科
    2. 518033 深圳,中山大学附属第八医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-20 出版日期:2020-12-10
  • 通信作者: 许尔蛟
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0112000); 国家自然科学基金重点项目(81430038); 国家自然科学基金(81401434); 广东省科技计划项目(2017A020215082,2017A020215137); 广州市科技计划项目(201704020164); 中山大学青年教师培育项目(20ykpy37); 深圳市福田区卫生公益性科研项目(FTWS2020022)

Safety and clinical efficacy of EmprintTM microwave ablation system for hepatocellular carcinoma

Xiaodan Zhang1, Huolin Ye1, Yating Su1, Qingjin Zeng1, Xuqi He1, Kai Li1, Rongqin Zheng1, Erjiao Xu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
    2. Department of Medical Ultrasonics, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518033, China
  • Received:2020-07-20 Published:2020-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Erjiao Xu
引用本文:

张小丹, 叶火林, 苏雅婷, 曾庆劲, 贺需旗, 李凯, 郑荣琴, 许尔蛟. EmprintTM微波消融系统在肝细胞癌治疗中的安全性及疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(06): 582-586.

Xiaodan Zhang, Huolin Ye, Yating Su, Qingjin Zeng, Xuqi He, Kai Li, Rongqin Zheng, Erjiao Xu. Safety and clinical efficacy of EmprintTM microwave ablation system for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(06): 582-586.

目的

探讨具有臻圆TM技术的EmprintTM微波消融系统在肝细胞癌(肝癌)治疗中的安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2019年1月至2019年5月在中山大学附属第三医院诊治的24例肝癌患者临床资料。其中男18例,女6例;平均年龄(52±11)岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。采用EmprintTM微波消融系统行微波消融治疗,消融功率100 W。根据第一针消融时间不同分为5 min组和10 min组,术中即时超声造影(CEUS)评估第一针消融范围,观察术后1个月完全消融率及消融相关主要并发症发生率。两组第一针消融范围比较采用t检验。

结果

24例患者共27个病灶在实时超声引导下EmprintTM微波消融系统消融,其中5 min组11个病灶和10 min组16个病灶。病灶消融次数中位数2(1~7)次,消融总时间为10(5~45) min。5 min组消融灶长径为(29.3±2.6) mm,明显小于10 min组的(33.7±6.7)mm(t=-2.389,P<0.05);而两组横径、圆度指数和消融灶面积相应为(25.8±3.0)mm、0.88±0.10、(2 384±406)mm2和(27.0±6.3)mm、0.81±0.14、(2 939±1 091)mm2,差异无统计学意义(t=-0.657,1.518,-1.857;P>0.05)。术后1个月复查增强CT或MRI显示,除2例未返院进行复查,余25个病灶均完全消融,完全消融率为100%;复查患者均未发现消融相关主要并发症。

结论

EmprintTM微波消融系统用于肝癌治疗安全、有效。在100 W功率下,5 min消融时间可能较10 min更能获得接近于规则、可预测的球形消融范围。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of EmprintTM microwave ablation system with ThermosphereTM technology in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 24 HCC patients admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2019 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 18 patients were male and 6 female, aged (52±11) years on average. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The microwave ablation was performed with EmprintTM microwave ablation system with an ablation power of 100 W. According to different ablation time of the first insertion, all lesions were divided into the 5-min and 10-min groups. The ablation range of first insertion was assessed by intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Complete ablation rate and the incidence of major complications induced by ablation were observed at postoperative 1 month. The ablation range of first insertion was compared between two groups by t test.

Results

27 lesions from 24 patients were ablated with real-time ultrasound-guided EmprintTM microwave ablation system, including 11 lesions in the 5-min group and 16 lesions in the 10-min group. The median ablation frequency was 2(1-7) times, and the total ablation time was 10(5-45) min. In the 5-min group, the maximal diameter of ablated lesions was (29.3±2.6) mm, significantly shorter than (33.7±6.7) mm in the 10-min group (t=-2.389, P<0.05). The transverse diameter, round index and ablation area in the 5-min group were (25.8±3.0) mm, 0.88±0.10, (2 384±406) mm2, which did not significantly differ from (27.0±6.3) mm, 0.81±0.14 and (2 939±1 091) mm2 in the 10-min group (t=-0.657, 1.518, -1.857; P>0.05). Enhanced CT scan or MRI at postoperative 1 month showed that 25 lesions were completely ablated with a complete ablation rate of 100% except 2 cases who did not receive reexamination. Reexamination revealed no major complications related to ablation.

Conclusions

EmprintTM microwave ablation system is a safe and effective method for HCC. 5-min ablation with a power of 100 W can obtain more regular and predictable spherical ablation range compared with 10-min ablation.

图1 一例EmprintTM微波消融系统消融治疗肝癌患者影像学检查
[1]
Feng RM, Zong YN, Cao SM, et al. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics?[J]. Cancer Commun, 2019, 39(1):22.
[2]
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2016, 66(2):115-132.
[3]
李民,熊俊.《原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版)》解读[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019, 28(7):785-789.
[4]
郑加生,范卫君,胡凯文,等.影像引导肝脏肿瘤热消融治疗技术临床规范化应用专家共识[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017, 33(10): 1864-1869.
[5]
Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2018, 69(1):182-236.
[6]
万赤丹,王国斌.原发性肝癌治疗进展[J].腹部外科,2019, 32(1):1-6, 22.
[7]
Bailey CW, Sydnor MK Jr. Current state of tumor ablation therapies[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2019, 64(4): 951-958.
[8]
Takahashi H, Kahramangil B, Kose E, et al. A comparison of microwave thermosphere versus radiofrequency thermal ablation in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases[J]. HPB, 2018, 20(12): 1157-1162.
[9]
Zaidi N, Okoh A, Yigitbas H, et al. Laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: an analysis of 53 cases[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2016, 113(2):130-134.
[10]
Berber E. Laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: an initial clinical evaluation[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(2):692-698.
[11]
Alonzo M, Bos A, Bennett S, et al. The Emprint™ ablation system with thermosphere™ technology: one of the newer next-generation microwave ablation technologies[J]. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2015, 32(4):335-338.
[12]
Imajo K, Tomeno W, Kanezaki M, et al. New microwave ablation system for unresectable liver tumors that forms large, spherical ablation zones[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 33(12):2007-2014.
[13]
Ierardi AM, Mangano A, Floridi C, et al. A new system of microwave ablation at 2450 MHz: preliminary experience[J]. Updates Surg, 2015, 67(1):39-45.
[14]
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017, 33(8):1419-1431.
[15]
Vogl TJ, Basten LM, Nour-Eldin NA, et al. Evaluation of microwave ablation of liver malignancy with enabled constant spatial energy control to achieve a predictable spherical ablation zone[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 34(4):492-500.
[16]
Ierardi AM, Coppola A, Lucchina N, et al. Treatment of lung tumours with high-energy microwave ablation: a single-centre experience[J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 34(1):5.
[17]
De Cobelli F, Marra P, Ratti F, et al. Microwave ablation of liver malignancies: comparison of effects and early outcomes of percutaneous and intraoperative approaches with different liver conditions: new advances in interventional oncology: state of the art[J]. Med Oncol, 2017, 34(4):49.
[18]
Kodama H, Ueshima E, Gao S, et al. High power microwave ablation of normal swine lung: impact of duration of energy delivery on adverse event and heat sink effects[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 34(8):1186-1193.
[19]
Takahashi H, Kahramangil B, Berber E. Local recurrence after microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumors: results of a surgical series[J]. Surgery, 2018, 163(4):709-713.
[20]
Hickson G, Patel N, King A, et al. Morphometric and chronological behavior of 2.45 GHz microwave ablation zones for colorectal cancer metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver: preliminary report[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2016, 41(8):1611-1617.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[9] 叶晓琳, 刘云飞, 庞明泉, 王海久, 任利, 侯立朝, 于文昊, 王志鑫, 樊海宁. 肝再生细胞来源及调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
[10] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[11] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[12] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[13] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[14] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[15] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
阅读次数
全文


摘要