切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 285 -289. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.03.011

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

MRI征象对LI-RADS 5分肝癌微血管浸润及术后早期复发的预测价值
肖远强1, 李梦思1, 邝思驰1, 张林启1, 朱婕1, 王劲1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-19 出版日期:2021-06-10
  • 通信作者: 王劲
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大研究计划培育项目(91959118); 中华国际医学会交流基金会SKY影像科研基金项目(Z-2014-07-1912-15)

Predictive value of MRI signs for microvascular invasion and postoperative early recurrence in patients with LI-RADS 5 hepatocellular carcinoma

Yuanqiang Xiao1, Mengsi Li1, Sichi Kuang1, Linqi Zhang1, Jie Zhu1, Jin Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2021-03-19 Published:2021-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jin Wang
引用本文:

肖远强, 李梦思, 邝思驰, 张林启, 朱婕, 王劲. MRI征象对LI-RADS 5分肝癌微血管浸润及术后早期复发的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 285-289.

Yuanqiang Xiao, Mengsi Li, Sichi Kuang, Linqi Zhang, Jie Zhu, Jin Wang. Predictive value of MRI signs for microvascular invasion and postoperative early recurrence in patients with LI-RADS 5 hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(03): 285-289.

目的

探讨MRI征象对肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)5分的单发肝细胞癌(肝癌)患者微血管浸润(MVI)及术后早期复发的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年3月至2018年10月中山大学附属第三医院收治的211例肝癌肝切除术患者临床资料。其中男158例,女53例;年龄31~78岁,中位年龄47岁。所有患者术前1个月内行3.0-T动态增强MRI检查,均为LI-RADS 5分(LR-5)的单发肝癌。根据组织病理学检查结果评估MVI,术后通过临床及影像学随访明确肿瘤早期复发。采用Logistic回归分析与术后早期复发相关的临床和影像学独立预测因子。

结果

211例肝癌切除患者中,57例病理证实MVI,49例术后肿瘤早期复发。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,马赛克征是肝癌MVI的独立预测因素(OR=2.308,95%CI:1.166~4.569,P<0.05);晕征是肝切除术后肝癌早期复发的独立预测因素(OR=2.447,95%CI:1.213~4.939,P<0.05)。

结论

对于LR-5单发肝癌患者,动态MRI的马赛克征和晕征可预测肝癌MVI和肝切除术后早期复发。

Objective

To evaluate the predictive value of MRI sings for the microvascular invasion (MVI) and postoperative early recurrence in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) classified as Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 5.

Methods

Clinical data of 211 HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from March 2014 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 158 patients were male and 53 female, aged from 31 to 78 years with a median age of 47 years. All patients received 3.0-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examination within 1 month before operation, and all of them were diagnosed with single HCC classified as LI-RADS 5 (LR-5). MVI was evaluated according to the histopathological examination result. Early recurrence of HCC was confirmed by clinical and imaging follow-up. The independent clinical and imaging predictors for postoperative recurrence were analyzed by Logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among 211 patients undergoing hepatectomy, 57 cases were pathologically diagnosed with MVI and 49 cases developed postoperative early recurrence. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that mosaic sign was an independent predictor for MVI in HCC patients (OR=2.308, 95%CI: 1.166-4.569, P<0.05). Halo sign was an independent predictor for early recurrence of HCC after hepatectomy (OR=2.447, 95%CI:1.213-4.939, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Mosaic and halo signs of dynamic MRI can predict MVI and early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with single HCC classified as LR-5.

表1 肝癌微血管浸润预测因素的Logistic回归分析
表2 肝癌术后早期复发预测因素的Logistic回归分析
[1]
Bertuccio P, Turati F, Carioli G, et al. Global trends and predictions in hepatocellular carcinoma mortality[J]. J Hepatol, 2017, 67(2):302-309.
[2]
Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, et al. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update[J]. Hepatol Int, 2017, 11(4):317-370.
[3]
Bruix J, Gores GJ, Mazzaferro V. Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical frontiers and perspectives[J]. Gut, 2014, 63(5):844-855.
[4]
Lee S, Kim SH, Lee JE, et al. Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for predicting microvascular invasion in patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2017, 67(3):526-534.
[5]
Zhao J, Li X, Zhang K, et al. Prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma with preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparison of mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values[J]. Medicine, 2017, 96(33):e7754.
[6]
Renzulli M, Brocchi S, Cucchetti A, et al. Can current preoperative imaging be used to detect microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Radiology, 2016, 279(2):432-442.
[7]
American College of Radiology (ACR). Liver reporting and data system (LI-RADS)[EB/OL]. 2019-04-17.

URL    
[8]
杜婧,杨正汉. 肝脏影像报告及数据系统LI-RADS 2018版更新解读[J]. 放射学实践, 2019, 35(5):668-672.
[9]
吕蓉,于长路. 肝脏影像报告和数据系统LI-RADS中MRI辅助特征的解读[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2019, 42(5):584-592.
[10]
丛文铭,步宏,陈杰,等. 原发性肝癌规范化病理诊断指南2015年版[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2015, 11(40):865-872.
[11]
He M, Zhang P, Ma X, et al. Radiomic feature-based predictive model for microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2020(10):574228.
[12]
Zhao WC, Fan LF, Yang N, et al. Preoperative predictors of microvascular invasion in multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013, 39(8):858-864.
[13]
杨浩,陈景标,张瑶,等. 三维磁共振弹性成像诊断肝癌纤维包膜形成[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术电子杂志, 2019, 8(3):252-255.
[14]
张瑶,张林启,陈景标,等. 钆贝葡胺与钆塞酸二钠增强MRI诊断HBV相关肝癌包膜的效能比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术电子杂志, 2020, 9(7):72-76.
[15]
Li M, Xin Y, Fu S, et al. Corona enhancement and mosaic architecture for prognosis and selection between of liver resection versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in single hepatocellular carcinomas >5 cm without extrahepatic metastases: an imaging-based retrospective study[J]. Medicine , 2016, 95(2):e2458.
[16]
Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, et al. Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018: imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma in at-risk patients[J]. Radiology, 2018, 289(3):816-830.
[17]
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J].J Hepatol, 2018, 69(1):182-236.
[18]
Choi SH, Lee SS, Park SH, et al. LI-RADS classification and prognosis of primary liver cancers at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI[J]. Radiology, 2019, 290(2):388-397.
[19]
Ariizumi S, Kitagawa K, Kotera Y, et al. A non-smooth tumor margin in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts microscopic portal vein invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, and early recurrence after hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2011, 18(4):575-585.
[1] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[2] 叶晓琳, 刘云飞, 庞明泉, 王海久, 任利, 侯立朝, 于文昊, 王志鑫, 樊海宁. 肝再生细胞来源及调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
[3] 尚培中, 张润萍, 张伟, 贾国洪, 李晓武, 苗建军, 刘冰. 梗阻性黄疸临床防治新技术单中心应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 104-107.
[4] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[5] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[6] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[7] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[8] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[9] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[10] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[11] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[12] 冯冰, 邹秋果, 梁振波, 卢艳明, 曾奕, 吴淑苗. 老年非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌超声征象与分子生物学指标的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 48-51.
[13] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[14] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[15] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
阅读次数
全文


摘要