切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 517 -522. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.05.009

临床研究

腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效
王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟()   
  1. 528000 广东省佛山市第一人民医院肝脏胰腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-04 出版日期:2023-10-10
  • 通信作者: 陈焕伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省医学科研基金项目(A2018145)

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Fengjie Wang, Liguang Wang, Shan Liao, Ying Liu, Rongdang Fu, Huanwei Chen()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2023-07-04 Published:2023-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Huanwei Chen
引用本文:

王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.

Fengjie Wang, Liguang Wang, Shan Liao, Ying Liu, Rongdang Fu, Huanwei Chen. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(05): 517-522.

目的

探讨腹腔镜右半肝切除术(LRH)治疗肝细胞癌(肝癌)的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2020年7月佛山市第一人民医院收治的85例肝癌患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男75例,女10例;年龄29~74岁,中位年龄52岁。肝功能均为Child-Pugh分级A级,肿瘤直径<8 cm。根据手术方式不同分为LRH组与开腹右半肝切除术(ORH)组,两组均采用标准化、流程化前入路右半肝切除术。两组手术时间、术后住院时间等比较采用t检验或秩和检验,术后并发症等率的比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

LRH组平均手术时间为(332±52)min,明显长于ORH组的(287±59)min(t=3.316,P<0.05)。LRH组术后肛门排气时间为(1.5±0.9)d,明显短于ORH组的(2.8±0.8)d(t=-3.119,P<0.05)。LRH组术后住院时间中位数为9(2)d,明显短于ORH组的12(4)d(Z=-3.210,P<0.05)。LRH组无围手术期死亡,ORH组围手术期死亡2例,差异无统计学意义(P=0.508)。LRH组术后并发症发生率为16%(4/25),ORH组为33%(20/60),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.617,P>0.05)。LRH组无肝切缘旁复发,腹腔种植性转移1例;ORH组肝切缘旁复发1例,腹腔种植性转移2例,切缘旁复发差异无统计学意义(P=1.000),腹腔种植性转移差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=0.243,P>0.05)。LRH组术后1、3年无瘤生存率分别为72.0%、62.6%,ORH组相应为65.6%、41.0%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.835,P>0.05)。LRH组术后1、3年总体生存率分为96.0%、75.4%,ORH组相应为88.3%、76.5%,差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=0.016,P>0.05)。

结论

标准化、流程化前入路LRH治疗肝癌安全、可行,具有微创、术后恢复快等优势,在无瘤生存及总体生存等方面与ORH相当。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy (LRH) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 85 HCC patients admitted to the First People's Hospital of Foshan from January 2014 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 75 patients were male and 10 female, aged 29-74 years with a median age of52 years. All patients were classified as Child-Pugh A, and the tumor diameter was <8 cm. According to different surgical procedures, all patients were divided into the LRH group and open right hemihepatectomy (ORH) group. Standardized and processed right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach was adopted in two groups. The operation time and the length of postoperative hospital stay between two groups were compared by t test or rank-sum test. The rate comparison, such as the incidence rate of postoperative complications, between two groups was compared by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test. Survival analysis was conducted by Kaplan-Meier curve and Log-rank test.

Results

The average operation time in the LRH group was (332±52) min, significantly longer than (287±59) min in the ORH group (t=3.316, P<0.05). The time to first flatus in the LRH group was (1.5±0.9) d, significantly shorter than (2.8±0.8) d in the ORH group (t=-3.119, P<0.05). The median length of postoperative hospital stay in the LRH group was 9(2) d, significantly shorter than 12(4) d in the ORH group (Z=-3.210, P<0.05). No perioperative death was reported in the LRH group, 2 cases in the ORH group, and no significant difference was observed between two groups (P=0.508). In the LRH group, the incidence of postoperative complications was 16%(4/25) and 33%(20/60) in the ORH group, and no significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=2.617, P>0.05). In the LRH group, no hepatic marginal recurrence occurred, and 1 case had abdominal implantation metastasis. In the ORH group, 1 case developed hepatic marginal recurrence and 2 cases of abdominal implantation metastasis. No significant differences were observed in hepatic marginal recurrence (P=1.000) and abdominal implantation metastasis (χ2=0.243, P>0.05) between two groups. In the LRH group, the postoperative 1-, 3-year tumor-free survival rates were 72.0%, 62.6%, and 65.6%, 41.0% in the ORH group, respectively. No significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=2.835, P>0.05). In the LRH group, the postoperative 1-, 3-year overall survival rates were 96.0%, 75.4%, and 88.3%, 76.5% in the ORH group, respectively. No significant difference was observed between two groups (χ2=0.016, P>0.05).

Conclusions

It is safe and feasible to apply standardized and processed LRH via the anterior approach for the treatment of HCC, which has multiple advantages of minimal invasiveness and rapid postoperative recovery. Moreover, LRH yields equivalent tumor-free survival and overall survival to ORH.

表1 LRH组与ORH组肝癌患者术前一般资料比较
图1 一例肝癌患者LRH手术Trocar位置及术中情况注:a示Trocar位置,b为右肝蒂Glisson鞘外结扎,c为腹腔镜直线切割闭合器闭合离断右肝蒂;LRH为腹腔镜右半肝切除术
表2 LRH组与ORH组肝癌患者围手术期情况比较
表3 LRH组与ORH组肝癌患者术后并发症Clavien分级比较(例)
图2 LRH组与ORH组肝癌患者Kaplan-Meier无瘤生存曲线注:LRH为腹腔镜右半肝切除术,ORH为开腹右半肝切除术
[1]
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(5):825-830.
[2]
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liverresection-2,804 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(5):831-841.
[3]
Yu X, Luo D, Tang Y, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy technology in right hemihepatectomy[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1):18809.
[4]
Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Fuks D, et al. Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations-a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020, 27(1):3-15.
[5]
Zhang Y, Chen XM, Sun DL. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2016, 26(6):e157-160.
[6]
卢毅, 胡智明, 张成武, 等. 腹腔镜循中肝静脉和肝后下腔静脉平面右半肝切除治疗原发性肝癌的临床疗效研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2022, 37(1):57-59.
[7]
曹利, 李建伟. 腹腔镜前入路解剖性右半肝切除术[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(4):375.
[8]
卢鹏, 纪文斌, 王宏光. 腹腔镜下右半肝切除手术流程[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(2):141-144.
[9]
胡三元. 腹腔镜右半肝切除手术入路经验分享[J/CD]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(3):142-143.
[10]
Clark J, Mavroeidis VK, Lemmon B, et al. Intention to treat laparoscopic versus open hemi-hepatectomy: a paired case-matched comparison study[J]. Scand J Surg, 2020, 109(3):211-218.
[11]
Cheek SM, Sucandy I, Tsung A. Evidence supporting laparoscopic major hepatectomy[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2016, 23(3):257-259.
[12]
Gil E, Kwon CHD, Kim JM, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor size larger than 5 cm: review of 45 cases in a tertiary institution[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2017, 27(8):799-803.
[13]
Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH,et al. Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(5):856-863.
[14]
Cho HD, Kim KH, Hwang S. Comparison of pure laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy by multivariate analysis: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2):643-650.
[15]
Yin X, Luo D, Huang Y, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(23): e15929.
[16]
Cipriani F, Alzoubi M, Fuks D, et al. Pure laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a critical assessment and realistic expectations-a propensity score-based analysis of right and left hemihepatectomies from nine European tertiary referral centers[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2020, 27(1):3-15.
[17]
张成, 王春明, 钟凯航, 等. "五步法"腹腔镜前入路右半肝切除术治疗巨大肝癌的安全性及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(1):32-38.
[18]
Goumard C, Komatsu S, Brustia R, et al. Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopic right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma following sequential TACE-PVE: a comparative study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(5):2340-2349.
[19]
Tozzi F, Berardi G, Vierstraete M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open approach for formal right and left hepatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(8):2627-2634.
[20]
Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Konno H, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic major hepatectomy with propensity score matched open cases from the National Clinical Database in Japan[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2016, 23(11):721-734.
[21]
Yoon YI, Kim KH, Kang SH, et al. Pure laparoscopic versus open right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score matched analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(5):856-863.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[12] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[13] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[14] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[15] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
阅读次数
全文


摘要