切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 651 -655. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.06.012

临床研究

不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响
张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松()   
  1. 363000 福建省漳州市,第九〇九医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)普通外科
    363000 福建省漳州市,第九〇九医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)介入科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-29 出版日期:2023-12-10
  • 通信作者: 胡添松
  • 基金资助:
    全军医药卫生科研基金项目(XZ21)

Clinicopathological characteristics of pedunculated hepatocellular carcinoma in different sites and its effects on postoperative intrahepatic recurrence and prognosis

Wenhua Zhang, Cui Tao, Tiansong Hu()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, The 909th Hospital (Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University), Zhangzhou 363000, China
    Department of Interventional Medicine, The 909th Hospital (Dongnan Hospital of Xiamen University), Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2023-08-29 Published:2023-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Tiansong Hu
引用本文:

张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.

Wenhua Zhang, Cui Tao, Tiansong Hu. Clinicopathological characteristics of pedunculated hepatocellular carcinoma in different sites and its effects on postoperative intrahepatic recurrence and prognosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 651-655.

目的

探讨不同部位外生型肝癌(PHCC)临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年6月第九〇九医院收治的87例PHCC患者临床资料。其中男51例,女36例;年龄41~69岁,中位年龄54岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据肿瘤生长部位不同将患者分为膈面PHCC组(膈面组,39例)和脏面PHCC组(脏面组,48例)。分析两组患者病理特征差异,并分析术后3年肿瘤肝内复发率和术后生存情况。采用单因素分析和Logistic多因素回归模型分析术后PHCC肝内复发和预后的影响因素。

结果

膈面组PHCC临床症状出现率64%(25/39),明显高于脏面组PHCC的39%(11/48) (χ2=15.047,P<0.05)。膈面组PHCC肿瘤直径>8 cm、切缘距离≤1 cm、微血管侵犯患者分别有32、17、21例,脏面组PHCC相应为16、6、8例,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.720,4.440,5.228;P<0.05)。术后3年肝内复发率为44%(38/87),死亡率为37%(32/87);肿瘤包膜不完整、切缘距离≤1 cm、微血管侵犯、脏面生长是术后3年肝内复发的独立影响因素(OR=2.113,2.866,3.025,2.534;P<0.05);肿瘤直径>8 cm、包膜不完整、微血管侵犯、脏面生长是PHCC患者术后3年死亡的独立影响因素(OR=2.336,2.857,3.044,2.758;P<0.05)。

结论

膈面PHCC患者临床症状出现早、易早期发现,而脏面PHCC患者发现时往往肿瘤直径较大、且易发生微血管侵犯、根治性切除率低。脏面生长患者术后肝内复发高,且术后预后差。

Objective

To investigate clinicopathological characteristics of pedunculated hepatocellular carcinoma (PHCC) in different sites and the effects on postoperative intrahepatic recurrence and prognosis.

Methods

Clinical data of 87 PHCC patients admitted to The 909th Hospital from January 2017 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 51 patients were male and 36 female, aged from 41 to 69 years, with a median age of 54 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients were divided into the diaphragmatic PHCC (n=39) and visceral PHCC groups (n=48) according to different tumor growth sites. The differences of pathological characteristics were analyzed between two groups. The postoperative 3-year intrahepatic recurrence rate and postoperative survival were also assessed. Univariate analysis and Logistic multivariate regression model were adopted to analyze the influencing factors of postoperative intrahepatic recurrence and prognosis of PHCC.

Results

The incidence of clinical symptoms of diaphragmatic PHCC group was 64%(25/39), which was significantly higher than 39%(11/48) of visceral PHCC group (χ2=15.047, P<0.05). In the diaphragmatic PHCC group, there were 32 cases of PHCC diameter >8 cm, 17 cases of incisional margin ≤1 cm and 21 cases of microvascular invasion, and 16, 6, 8 cases in the visceral PHCC group accordingly, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.720, 4.440, 5.228; P<0.05). The postoperative 3-year intrahepatic recurrence rate was 44%(38/87) and the mortality rate was 37%(32/87). Incomplete tumor encapsulation, incisional margin ≤1 cm, microvascular invasion and visceral surface growth were the independent influencing factors of postoperative 3-year intrahepatic recurrence (OR=2.113, 2.866, 3.025, 2.534; P<0.05). Tumor diameter>8 cm, incomplete tumor encapsulation, microvascular invasion and visceral surface growth were the independent influencing factors of postoperative 3-year mortality rate (OR=2.336, 2.857, 3.044, 2.758; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Patients with diaphragmatic PHCC present with early clinical symptoms, which can be identified during early stage. However, those with visceral PHCC develop large tumor diameter, high-risk microvascular invasion and low radical resection rate upon diagnosis. Patients with visceral PHCC have high postoperative intrahepatic recurrence and poor postoperative prognosis.

表1 膈面组和脏面组PHCC患者临床病理特征比较(例)
表2 PHCC患者术后3年肝内复发影响因素分析(例)
表3 PHCC患者术后3年死亡影响因素分析(例)
[1]
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6):394-424.
[2]
樊嘉, 杨欣荣, 王鹏翔. 肝癌精准诊疗新进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(3):248-252.
[3]
金晓蕾, 朱珍, 梁宗辉. 肝脏外生型肿瘤的影像诊断思维[J]. 影响诊断与介入放射学, 2021, 30(3):228-231.
[4]
于爱军, 于满, 迟强, 等. 外生型肝癌误诊为肾上腺嗜铬细胞瘤临床报告并文献复习[J]. 临床误诊误诊, 2021, 34(5):14-17.
[5]
李镇利, 严文韬, 权冰, 等. 外生型肝癌的外科治疗及远期预后影响因素[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2018, 30(6):441-447.
[6]
Dong AS, Zhong XP, Wang Y. Pedunculated hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking right adrenal tumor on FDG PET/CT[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2018, 43(7):e242-244.
[7]
Huang DX, Chen Y, Zeng QL, et al. Blood supply characteristics of pedunculated hepatocellular carcinoma prior to and following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment: an angiographic demonstration[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 15(3):3383-3389.
[8]
Numbere N, Zhang D, Agostini-Vulaj D. A rare histologic subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a case[J]. Hepat Oncol, 2020, 8(2):HEP33.
[9]
易如, 姜慧杰, 张金英, 等. 肝脏外生型实质肿瘤的影像诊断思维[J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学, 2021, 30(4):312-315.
[10]
Sahu SK, Chawla YK, Dhiman RK, et al. Rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of literature[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2019, 9(2):245-256.
[11]
Wu JJ, Zhu P, Zhang ZG, et al. Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: optimal timing of partial hepatectomy[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2019, 45(10):1887-1894.
[12]
杨连粤. 孤立性大肝癌的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(1):13-16.
[13]
邓家仲, 荚卫东. 肝细胞癌微血管侵犯危险因素分析及术前预测列线图模型构建[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 202l, 30(7):772-779.
[14]
Zhang H, Zhou Y, Li Y, et a1. Predictive vahle of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to lymphocyte count ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1):132.
[15]
Neoptolemos JP, Kleeff J, Michl P, et al. Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2018, 15(6):333-348.
[16]
Di Sandro S, Centonze L, Pinotti E, et al. Surgical and oncological outcomes of hepatic resection for BCLC-B hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter analysis among 474 consecutive cases[J]. Updates Surg, 2019, 71(2):285-293.
[17]
Huang J, Liu FC, Li L, et al. Nomograms to predict the long-time prognosis in patients with alpha-fetoprotein negative hepatocellular carcinoma following radical resection[J]. Cancer Med, 2020, 9(8):2791-2802.
[18]
Park S, Choi S, Cho YA, et al. Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th Edition Staging System for hepatocellular carcinoma in 1, 008 patients with curative resection[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2020, 52(4):1145-1152.
[19]
Llovet JM, Brú C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 1999, 19(3):329-338.
[20]
Wang H, Wu MC, Cong WM. Microvascular invasion predicts a poor prognosis of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma up to 2 cm based on propensity score matching analysis[J].Hepatol Res, 2019, 49(3):344-354.
[21]
Han J, Li ZL, Xing H, et al. The impact of resection margin and microvascular invasion on long-term prognosis after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-institutional study[J]. HPB, 2019, 21(8):962-971.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[7] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[8] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[9] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[10] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[11] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[12] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[13] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?