切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 805 -812. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2025.06.001

指南与共识

倡用图文外科手术记录专家共识(2025版)
中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组   
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-23 出版日期:2025-12-10

Expert consensus on advocating the use of graphic surgical records (2025 edition)

Group of Operative Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association   

  • Received:2025-04-23 Published:2025-12-10
引用本文:

中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组. 倡用图文外科手术记录专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 805-812.

Group of Operative Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on advocating the use of graphic surgical records (2025 edition)[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(06): 805-812.

手术记录是手术科室病历和医疗文书的核心组成部分。手术记录的标准化有利于规范手术流程,提高手术质量,保障患者安全。为了使手术记录能更客观、直观和详细地反映手术实境,一直以来,国内外许多高水平医院的外科中心沿袭以“图文结合形式 ”书写手术记录的良好传统,以便复盘手术及结构化数据的采集,也便于高质量临床研究和手术教学的实施。2015年,中华医学会外科学分会手术学学组制订了《倡用图文外科手术记录专家共识》。近年来,信息技术的迅猛发展为图文手术记录的进一步推广提供了技术保障。经过多方、多次相关专家的讨论和调研,在充分考虑国家相关政策要求、信息标准及临床应用实践难点和最新研究成果的基础上,中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组修订了2025版共识,旨在加强图文手术记录的标准化和规范化,促进外科医疗、科研及教学质量的提升,助力健康中国建设。

Surgical records are the core components of medical documents in clinical centers of surgery. Standardization of surgical records contributes to standardizing surgical procedures, improving the quality of surgery, and ensuring patient safety. To ensure that surgical records more objectively, visually, and comprehensively reflect the actual surgical process, numerous high-level university hospitals' surgical centers have long adhered to the good tradition of documenting surgical records in a “combination of text and images” format. Graphic surgical records not only benefit postoperative review and structured data collection but also facilitate the implementation of high-quality clinical research and surgical training. As early as 2015, Group of Operative Surgery, Chinese Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association already formulated the “Expert Consensus on Advocating the use of graphic surgical records”. In recent years, rapid development of information technology has provided technical support for the further promotion of graphical surgical records. After extensive and multiple rounds of professional discussions and investigations, and based on a thorough consideration of relevant national policy requirements, information standards, the 2025 edition of the “Expert Consensus” is intended to be revised, aiming to enhance the standardization of graphical surgical records, improve the quality of surgery and training system, as well as clinical researches, thereby contributing to the development of Healthy China.

图1 以图文形式总结正中弓状韧带综合征合并左半肝萎缩、囊性占位患者病例特点 注:a、b分别示萎缩的左半肝和囊性占位(黄色箭头)的横断位和冠状位CT图像(绿色箭头示肝左动脉及扩张的左外叶胆管);c示腹腔干CT血管造影的三维重建图;d示病例的手绘图[描绘:(1)腹腔干起始部前上方明显的Ⅴ型凹陷外压改变(红色箭头),狭窄远端扩张,呈典型钩状形态;(2)明显萎缩的左半肝和囊性占位];J1A为第一空肠动脉;IPDA为胰十二指肠下后动脉;CHA为肝总动脉;LGA为胃左动脉;SpA为脾动脉;SMA为肠系膜上动脉
图2 以图文形式记录动脉优先入路胰头癌根治性切除术中淋巴结清扫范围和重要血管离断部位 注:a、b、c为术中操作所见;d为解剖手绘图;IPDA为胰十二指肠下动脉;SMA为肠系膜上动脉;SMV为肠系膜上静脉;GDA为胃十二指肠动脉;PV为门静脉;CHA为肝总动脉;PSPDV为胰十二指肠后上静脉,可见断端;GCT为胃结肠静脉干,可见断端;SPV为脾静脉;12b为胆总管旁淋巴结;12p为门静脉旁淋巴结;13为胰头后淋巴结;12h为肝门部淋巴结;12a为肝固有动脉旁淋巴结;8a为肝总动脉旁淋巴结;14为肠系膜上动脉旁淋巴结
图3 胰十二指肠切除术中消化道重建及引流管放置的示意图 注:于Treitz韧带远端15 cm处离断空肠,上提做胆肠吻合(绿色三角,使用4-0可吸收线连续缝合),距胆肠吻合50 cm处行胃空肠吻合(毕Ⅱ氏,结肠前);使用5-0不可吸收线间断缝合胰管后壁与空肠切开孔后壁全层3针,固定胰管支架,用4-0不可吸收线连续缝合胰管前壁与空肠切开孔前壁全层,胰腺前切缘与空肠前壁浆肌层(红色三角);距胃空肠吻合10 cm处行布朗吻合(全层);1为胆肠吻合口背侧引流管(19 F) (1 F≈0.33 mm);2为胰肠下引流管(19 F);3为胰肠上引流管(19 F)
图4 肝脏7段结肠癌肝转移病灶切除标本及标示的示意图 注:标本长17.0 cm,宽8.7 cm,高7.5 cm;肿瘤大小4.4 cm×3.4 cm×4.1 cm;标本断面可见肝右静脉(RHV)主干和被侵犯的肝脏7段肝静脉第一分支(V7-1)
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组. 倡用图文外科手术记录专家共识 (2015·西安) [J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 4(5): 265-267. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2015.05.003.
[2]
陈耀龙, 杨克虎, 王小钦, 等. 中国制订/修订临床诊疗指南的指导原则(2022版)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102(10): 697-703. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn 112137-20211228-02911.
[3]
World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development[M/OL]. 2 Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2014.
[4]
Chen Y, Yang K, Marušic A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2017, 166(2): 128-132. DOI: 10.7326/M16-1565.
[5]
Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review[J]. J Evid Based Med, 2015, 8(1): 2-10. DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12141.
[6]
Powell C. The Delphi technique: myths and realities[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2003, 41(4): 376-382. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x.
[7]
景城阳, 刘瑞雪, 褚红玲, 等. 医学研究领域德尔菲法实施和报告标准 (CREDES) 解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2023, 23(2): 233-239. DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202210047.
[8]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 关于印发电子病历应用管理规范(试行)的通知[S/OL].
[9]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 电子病历共享文档规范 第9部分: 一般手术记录[S/OL]. (2016-08-23) [2025-01-15].
[10]
Otsubo T, Kobayashi S, Sano K, et al. A nationwide certification system to increase the safety of highly advanced hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2023, 30(1): 60-71. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1186.
[11]
日本肝胆外科学会高度技能専門医制度委員会. 肝胆高難度外科手術[M]. 2版. 东京: 医学書院, 2016: 334-340.
[12]
Gundogan E, Carkit S, Cinar O, et al. Trocar site location in laparoscopic appendectomy-a prospective randomized study[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2023, 33(5): 451-455. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001214.
[13]
Wang DC, Fu JW, Jiang T, et al. Meta-analysis of single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Updates Surg, 2023, 75(8): 2133-2145. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01634-0.
[14]
Gaia G, Sighinolfi MC, Rocco B, et al. Learning curve of optical trocar access during laparoscopic pelvic surgery: a prospective study[J]. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed), 2023, 47(10): 675-680. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.07.002.
[15]
Consalvo V, Salsano V, Sarno G, et al. Three-trocar sleeve gastrectomy vs standard five-trocar technique: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Obes Surg, 2017, 27(12): 3142-3148. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2760-0.
[16]
Polderdijk M, Brouwer M, Haverkamp L, et al. Outcomes of combined peritoneal and local treatment for patients with peritoneal and limited liver metastases of colorectal origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(3): 1952-1962. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10925-y.
[17]
Monden K, Alconchel F, Berardi G, et al. Landmarks and techniques to perform minimally invasive liver surgery: a systematic review with a focus on hepatic outflow[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2022, 29(1): 66-81. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.898.
[18]
Morimoto M, Tomassini F, Berardi G, et al. Glissonean approach for hepatic inflow control in minimally invasive anatomic liver resection: a systematic review[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2022, 29(1): 51-65. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.908.
[19]
Nagakawa Y, Watanabe Y, Kozono S, et al. Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2022, 29(1): 114-123. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.905.
[20]
Ironside N, Barreto SG, Loveday B, et al. Meta-analysis of an artery-first approach versus standard pancreatoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes and survival[J]. Br J Surg, 2018, 105(6): 628-636. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10832.
[21]
Negoi I, Beuran M, Hostiuc S, et al. Surgical anatomy of the superior mesenteric vessels related to pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2018, 22(5): 802-817. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3669-1.
[22]
Jiang X, Yu Z, Ma Z, et al. Superior mesenteric artery first approach can improve the clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 7314-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.007.
[23]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 卫生部办公厅关于印发《市、县级医院常见肿瘤规范化诊疗指南(试行)》的通知 [S/OL].
[24]
Sternby Eilard M, Lundgren L, Cahlin C, et al. Surgical treatment for gallbladder cancer-a systematic literature review[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2017, 52(5): 505-514. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1284895.
[25]
Widmann B, Warschkow R, Beutner U, et al. Effect of lymphadenectomy in curative gallbladder cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2020, 405(5): 573-584. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01878-z.
[26]
Lyu Y, Li T, Cheng Y, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs applying the ISGPS (2016) criteria[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2018, 28(3): 139-146. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000530.
[27]
PARANOIA Study Group, Writing group, Halle-Smith JM, et al. Perioperative interventions to reduce pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis[J]. Br J Surg, 2022, 109(9): 812-821. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac074.
[28]
Motoi F, Egawa S, Rikiyama T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy[J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(4): 524-531. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8654.
[29]
Lin R, Liu Y, Lin X, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of prophylactic irrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy on postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 137. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02873-w.
[1] 戴璐璐, 潘金花, 孔余霞, 蒋天安. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌射频消融与外科手术治疗效果的多角度对比[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(05): 444-450.
[2] 徐颖, 宋雨, 黄欣, 周易冬, 孙强, 林燕. 精准医学时代局部晚期乳腺癌的诊治热点[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 139-144.
[3] 何淳诺, 田志敏, 张浩强, 李焕玺, 庄凯鹏, 乔永杰, 周胜虎, 甄平. Salter骨盆截骨联合股骨近端截骨治疗儿童髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 391-401.
[4] 邢天娇, 陈向军, 吴迪, 康淑霞, 姚尧. 吸脂术联合强脉冲光与非剥脱点阵激光治疗体表脂肪瘤的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(04): 306-311.
[5] 华义, 王华, 杨旭. 习惯性髌骨脱位的治疗现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(04): 347-351.
[6] 宋成顺, 吕小飞, 薛军, 赵舸. 吲哚菁绿荧光成像技术在胃肠肿瘤手术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 188-192.
[7] 王伟全, 屈祥富, 周智. 手术治疗胆总管异物一例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 711-712.
[8] 张聪, 李成. 胰头区恶性肿瘤外科手术预后现状及相关因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 574-578.
[9] 邓吟咏, 钟洁, 蒋理立, 杨婕. 结直肠肿瘤手术后并发症的预测与预防:基于临床研究的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[10] 李世拥, 蔡慧云, 安萍, 杨梅, 常晓燕, 李宁, 李宛真, 张忠涛. 百年医路铸辉煌 数字创新谱华章——写在中华医学会成立110周年华诞与《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》发展历程[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 473-477.
[11] 陆益, 张威, 邓含, 石晗, 冯钰, 高旭, 吴小凤. 戴明循环与标准化流程改进降低泌尿外科腔内手术围术期低体温发生率[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 598-604.
[12] 朱嘉亿, 杨福全. 原发性腹膜后肿瘤诊治进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 383-389.
[13] 胡启明, 宋佳成, 孙莹, 黄骁昊. 单孔腹腔镜切除AWE及补片修复术的临床应用评估[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 215-221.
[14] 谢源, 彭菊红, 阴金波, 吕胜青, 刘国龙. 神经外科机器人辅助下多通道可视化脑干血肿清除术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(04): 254-256.
[15] 喻澄, 冯秋婷, 吴丹, 秦娴, 金艳, 曹佳宁, 杨军. 先天性心脏病外科术后复杂房性心律失常射频消融一例[J/OL]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 179-181.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?