切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (04) : 591 -599. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2026.04.013

临床研究

不同类型肝静脉型布加综合征介入治疗疗效分析
苟亚博, 肖晋昌, 神斌, 黄乾鑫, 魏宁, 刘洪涛, 徐浩, 祖茂衡, 张庆桥()   
  1. 221006 江苏省徐州医科大学附属医院介入放射科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-07 出版日期:2026-08-10
  • 通信作者: 张庆桥
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高水平医院建设项目(GSPJS202413)

Clinical efficacy of interventional therapy for patients with different types of hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome

Yabo Gou, Jinchang Xiao, Bin Shen, Qianxin Huang, Ning Wei, Hongtao Liu, Hao Xu, Maoheng Zu, Qingqiao Zhang()   

  1. Department of Interventional Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221006, China
  • Received:2026-01-07 Published:2026-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Qingqiao Zhang
引用本文:

苟亚博, 肖晋昌, 神斌, 黄乾鑫, 魏宁, 刘洪涛, 徐浩, 祖茂衡, 张庆桥. 不同类型肝静脉型布加综合征介入治疗疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 591-599.

Yabo Gou, Jinchang Xiao, Bin Shen, Qianxin Huang, Ning Wei, Hongtao Liu, Hao Xu, Maoheng Zu, Qingqiao Zhang. Clinical efficacy of interventional therapy for patients with different types of hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(04): 591-599.

目的

探讨不同类型肝静脉型布加综合征(BCS)的介入治疗临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2024年12月徐州医科大学附属医院收治的189例肝静脉型BCS患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男89例,女100例;年龄20~79岁,中位年龄46岁。根据肝静脉病变类型分为膜性组65例、节段组53例、广泛阻塞组39例、血栓组32例。膜性组和节段组采用球囊扩张和(或)支架置入治疗;广泛阻塞组采用经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术(TIPS)治疗;血栓组清除血栓,然后行血管成形术或TIPS治疗。术后采用彩超、磁共振静脉成像(MRV)或CT静脉成像监测血管通畅情况。治疗前后静脉压力改变比较采用配对t检验,肝功能Child-Pugh分级比较采用χ2 检验。首次累积通畅率采用Kaplan-Meier法计算并用Log-rank检验比较。

结果

所有患者介入治疗均成功,无严重并发症。介入治疗前后膜性组肝静脉-下腔静脉压差由(13.6±3.7) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)降至(4.1±1.6) mmHg,节段组由(11.7±2.3) mmHg降至(4.7±2.4) mmHg,血栓组由(14.2±3.1) mmHg降至(4.9±2.7) mmHg(t=15.649,16.537,17.341;P<0.05);广泛阻塞组门静脉压力梯度(PPG)由(24.7±3.5) mmHg下降至(9.8±2.8) mmHg(t=18.036,P<0.05)。随访时间3.0~134.0个月,中位随访时间65.3个月,失访8例。膜性组62例中肝静脉通畅51例,再狭窄11例;支架置入患者再狭窄率高于单纯球囊扩张患者(χ2=9.605,P=0.002)。节段组51例中肝静脉通畅34例,再狭窄17例;支架置入患者再狭窄率明显高于单纯球囊扩张患者(χ2=6.951,P=0.008)。广泛阻塞组37例中TIPS分流道通畅21例,支架内再狭窄16例;术后肝性脑病3例,2例患者分别于术后17、68个月死于肝衰竭。血栓组26例行血管成形术患者中肝静脉再狭窄12例,5例TIPS患者中支架内再狭窄1例,1例于术后105个月死于与BCS无关的原因。术前肝功能Child-Pugh分级A级、B级、C级的患者分别为58、76、47例,术后3个月相应为98、68、15例,肝功能明显改善(χ2=27.217,P<0.001)。1、3、5、10年的首次累积通畅率膜性组分别为92.2%、83.5%、75.4%、61.8%,节段组为90.8%、81.1%、63.3%、51.4%,广泛阻塞组为91.6%、81.6%、72.7%、52.2%,血栓组为84.7%、78.9%、67.3%、55.1%,4组首次累积通畅率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.094,P=0.778)。

结论

肝静脉型BCS根据不同类型采取相应介入治疗方法可取得较好的中远期疗效:膜性阻塞单纯球囊扩张即可取得较好疗效;节段性阻塞以球囊扩张治疗为主,支架置入可作为补救性治疗措施,广泛阻塞首选TIPS治疗;血栓形成患者先清除血栓,根据情况行血管成形术或TIPS治疗。

Objective

To evaluate clinical efficacy of interventional therapy for patients with different types of hepatic vein-type Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS).

Methods

Clinical data of 189 patients with hepatic vein-type BCS admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2014 to December 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 89 patients were male and 100 female, aged from 20 to 79 years, with a median age of 46 years. According to different types of hepatic venous lesions, all patients were divided into the membranous obstruction group (n=65), segmental obstruction group (n=53), extensive obstruction group (n=39) and thrombus group (n=32). In the membranous and segmental obstruction groups, balloon dilatation and/or stent implantation were performed. In the extensive obstruction group, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was adopted. In the thrombus group, thrombi were removed, followed by angioplasty or TIPS. Postoperative color Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance venography (MRV) or CT venography were used to monitor the patency of blood vessels. The changes of venous pressure before and after treatment were compared by paired t-test. Child-Pugh scores of liver function were compared by Chi-square test. The first cumulative patency rate was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Log-rank test.

Results

All patients were successfully treated by interventional therapy without severe complications. Before and after interventional therapy, the pressure difference between hepatic vein and inferior vena cava was decreased from (13.6±3.7) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) to (4.1±1.6) mmHg in the membranous obstruction group, from (11.7±2.3) mmHg to (4.7±2.4) mmHg in the segmental obstruction group , and from (14.2±3.1) mmHg to (4.9±2.7) mmHg in the thrombus group (t=15.649, 16.537, 17.341; all P<0.05). Portal pressure gradient (PPG) was decreased from (24.7±3.5) mmHg to (9.8±2.8) mmHg in the extensive obstruction group (t=18.036, P<0.05). The follow-up time was 3.0-134.0 months. The median follow-up time was 65.3 months. 8 cases were lost to follow-up. Among 62 patients in the membranous obstruction group, 51 cases achieved the patency of hepatic veins and 11 cases developed restenosis. The restenosis rate of patients undergoing stent implantation was significantly higher than that of those receiving balloon dilatation (χ2=9.605, P=0.002). Among 51 cases in the segmental obstruction group, 34 patients achieved the patency of hepatic veins and 17 cases had restenosis. The restenosis rate of patients with stent implantation was significantly higher than that of those receiving balloon dilatation (χ2=6.951, P=0.008). In the extensive obstruction group (n=37), 21 cases had vessel patency after TIPS and 16 cases had in-stent restenosis. 3 patients were diagnosed with hepatic encephalopathy after operation. 2 patients died of liver failure at postoperative 17 and 68 months,respectively. In the thrombus group, 12 of 26 patients undergoing angioplasty experienced hepatic venous restenosis, 1 of 5 cases receiving TIPS had in-stent restenosis, and 1 case died at postoperative 105 month, which was unrelated to BCS. According to preoperative Child-Pugh classification of liver function, 58, 76 and 47 patients were classified as Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B and Child-Pugh C, and 98, 68 and 15 cases of Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B and Child-Pugh C at postoperative 3 months, respectively. The liver function was significantly improved (χ2=27.217, P<0.001). The first cumulative patency rates at postoperative 1, 3, 5 and 10 years were 92.2%, 83.5%, 75.4% and 61.8% in the membranous obstruction group, 90.8%, 81.1%, 63.3% and 51.4% in the segmental obstruction group, 91.6%, 81.6%, 72.7% and 52.2% in the extensive occlusion group, and 84.7%, 78.9%, 67.3% and 55.1% in the thrombus group, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the first cumulative patency rate among four groups (χ2=1.094, P=0.778).

Conclusions

According to different types of hepatic vein-type BCS, corresponding interventional therapies can achieve favorable middle-and long-term efficacy. In the membranous obstruction group, balloon dilatation alone is recommended. Segmental obstruction is mainly treated by balloon dilatation, and stent implantation can be used as a remedial treatment. TIPS is recommended for extensive obstruction. For thrombosis patients, thrombi should be removed first, followed by angioplasty or TIPS according to individual conditions.

表1 189例肝静脉型BCS患者的基线资料
图1 肝静脉型BCS患者的介入治疗流程及疗效 注:BCS为布加综合征,TIPS为经颈静脉肝内门体静脉分流术
图2 一例膜性阻塞肝静脉型BCS患者介入治疗情况 注:a为肝右静脉造影示开口处膜性阻塞;b为采用直径12 mm球囊扩张;c为扩张后造影示肝右静脉血流通畅;d为术后18个月MRV示肝右静脉血流通畅;BCS为布加综合征,MRV为磁共振静脉成像
图3 一例节段性阻塞肝静脉型BCS患者介入治疗情况 注:a为造影示肝右静脉节段性阻塞;b为采用直径6 mm球囊扩张;c为扩张后造影示肝右静脉血流通畅;d为术后6个月MRV示肝右静脉血流通畅;BCS为布加综合征,MRV为磁共振静脉成像
图4 一例广泛性阻塞肝静脉型BCS患者介入治疗情况 注:a为造影示肝静脉广泛性阻塞;b为穿刺门静脉成功后用直径8 mm球囊扩张分流道;c为置入直径8 mm、长10 cm的Viabahn支架,造影示分流道血流通畅;d为术后9个月CT静脉成像示支架内血流通畅;BCS为布加综合征
表2 肝静脉型BCS患者介入治疗术前与术后3个月肝功能Child-Pugh分级比较(例)
表3 肝静脉型BCS患者介入治疗术后肝静脉/TIPS支架首次累积通畅率(%)
[1]
Garcia-Pagán JC, Valla DC. Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(14): 1307-1316. DOI: 10.1056/nejmra2207738.
[2]
Xia D, Luo B, Zhang C, et al. Interventional radiological management for budd-chiari syndrome: a 10-year retrospective, multicenter survey on 997 patients in China[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2025, 14: S1542-3565(25)00582-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.07.004.
[3]
甘海润, 罗慧妍, 王慧洁, 等. 布加综合征研究进展[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2025, 42(4): 274-278. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2025.04.003.
[4]
邓玉婷, 周俊英. 布加综合征诊治研究进展[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2023, 26(2): 156-159. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5069.2023.02.002.
[5]
Shukla A, Shreshtha A, Mukund A, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: consensus guidance of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL)[J]. Hepatol Int, 2021, 15(3): 531-567. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-021-10189-4.
[6]
郭旭, 吴浩. 肝静脉阻塞型布加综合征的研究进展[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2024, 40(1): 13-18. DOI: 10.12449/JCH240102.
[7]
雒博晗. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology|布加综合征的介入放射学管理: 一项针对中国997例患者的10年回顾性多中心调查[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2025, 41(8): 1578.
[8]
中国医师协会腔内血管学专业委员会腔静脉阻塞专家委员会. 布-加综合征亚型分型的专家共识[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(7): 1229-1235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5256.2017.07.005.
[9]
祖茂衡. 加强布加综合征介入治疗后再狭窄研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2024, 33(11): 1159-1161. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2024.11.001.
[10]
赵新宇, 余朝文, 陈世远, 等. 巴德-吉亚利综合征腔内治疗患者病变进展影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(1): 82-86. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.01.017.
[11]
Ma H, Gou Y, Wang C, et al. Feasibility and long-term outcomes of hepatic vein recanalization in Budd-Chiari syndrome through intrahepatic collateral pathways[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 36(10): 1230-1237. DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002822.
[12]
丁鹏绪, 张水军, 李震, 等. 肝静脉型布加综合征的介入治疗(附8年随访结果)[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2014, 21(12): 1500-1506. DOI: 10.7507/1007-9424.20140356.
[13]
高艳梅, 张惠玲, 雷文芳. Ⅱ型布加综合征患者血栓形成影响因素及介入治疗疗效观察[J]. 肝脏, 2023, 28(7): 837-839, 880. DOI: 10.14000/j.cnki.issn.1008-1704.2023.07.013.
[14]
全坤, 沙俊诚, 张庆桥, 等. 三维可视化技术引导下TIPS在巴德-吉亚利综合征中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(2): 154-158. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.02.009.
[15]
韩星, 黄乾鑫, 庄步强, 等. 介入治疗布加综合征合并肝静脉血栓的远期疗效[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2024, 34(6): 76-79. DOI: 10.20258/j.cnki.1006-9011.2024.06.017.
[16]
Patel RK, Chandel K, Tripathy T, et al. Interventions in Budd-Chiari syndrome: an updated review[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2025, 50(3): 1307-1319. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04558-4.
[17]
Moreno MOA, da Silva Lima Paz CL, Dezan MGF, et al. Ten-year outcomes of tips for Budd-Chiari syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arq Gastroenterol, 2024, 61: e23171. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-171.
[18]
Morales-Cruz X, Salinas C, Hernández-Cely G, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adults with Budd-Chiari syndrome: a single-center experience in Colombia[J]. Dig Dis, 2025: 1-7. DOI: 10.1159/000547006.
[19]
Malakar S, Shah N, Hoda US, et al. Comparison of direct intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and other major radiological interventions in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2025, 44(5): 708-718. DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01733-9.
[20]
Fitsiori K, Tsitskari M, Kelekis A, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for the treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome patients: results from a single center[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2014, 37(3): 691-697. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-013-0697-9.
[21]
Tripathi D, MacNicholas R, Kothari C, et al. Good clinical outcomes following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunts in Budd–Chiari syndrome[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2014, 39(8): 864-872. DOI: 10.1111/apt.12668.
[22]
Cheng D, Xu H, Lu ZJ, et al. Clinical features and etiology of Budd-Chiari syndrome in Chinese patients: a single-center study[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 28(6): 1061-1067. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.12140.
[23]
中国医师协会腔内血管学专业委员会腔静脉阻塞专家委员会. 下腔静脉与肝静脉“膜”与“节段”阻塞界定的专家共识[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2016, 25(7): 559-561. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2016.07.001.
[24]
张文耀, 许伟, 徐浩, 等. 大球囊扩张治疗肝静脉阻塞型布-加综合征临床研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2018, 27(10): 932-935. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-794X.2018.10.006.
[25]
Ding PX, Zhang SJ, Li Z, et al. Long-term safety and outcome of percutaneous transhepatic venous balloon angioplasty for Budd–Chiari syndrome[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 31(1): 222-228. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13025.
[26]
Sun X, Zhang J, Duan F, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement for hepatic vein type Budd-Chiari syndrome[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2021, 33(1S): e843-e850. DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002277.
[27]
Mann JP, Ikram F, Modin L, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: a single center experience from the United Kingdom[J]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2023, 77(4): 455-459. DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003860.
[28]
王磊, 祖茂衡, 顾玉明, 等. 儿童及青少年布加综合征的介入治疗[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2013, 51(8): 590-594. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2013.08.007.
[29]
Hayek G, Ronot M, Plessier A, et al. Long-term outcome and analysis of dysfunction of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement in chronic primary Budd-Chiari syndrome[J]. Radiology, 2017, 283(1): 280-292. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152641.
[30]
赵晨, 张庆桥, 徐浩, 等. 采用Viabahn支架行经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝静脉广泛闭塞布加综合征的疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2021, 29(10): 972-976. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200331-00151.
[1] 周文考, 袁丽, 任晓媛, 谢强, 苏力德, 闫敏, 陈智浩, 黄灵炎. 基于随机森林与LASSO回归的急性心肌梗死PCI术后3年不良事件预测模型构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 122-130.
[2] 方郁晖, 常钰泉, 何坤. 伴微血管侵犯的肝细胞癌术后辅助介入治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 53-59.
[3] 魏瑾, 姜华, 闫岩, 屈卓军, 金发光. 医护一体化管理模式对经支气管镜诊疗恶性中心气道狭窄的救治疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 807-810.
[4] 李鹏, 张维桢, 武国帅, 马伊凡, 张灵强. 超声造影在胰腺疾病中的应用研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(01): 119-123.
[5] 胡铭语, 李敬东, 肖雨竹, 黄杰. 初始不可切除肝癌患者转化治疗序贯手术的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 754-760.
[6] 周继升, 李丹, 米琳, 韩江莉. 急性冠脉综合征合并对比剂禁忌患者血管内超声指导零对比剂冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 408-413.
[7] 吴鸿权, 李鑫, 吴白露, 吴春舒, 李臻. 肺隔离症合并咯血的介入治疗患者一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 212-215.
[8] 支兴兴, 解银立, 朱锐, 翁高洁, 纪东华. 介入治疗产后卵巢静脉血栓两例[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 109-113.
[9] 赵瑾洁, 仲伟, 郑国学. 糖尿病下肢ASO患者血糖控制水平对介入术后凝血功能及复发风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 20-25.
[10] 何琴, 雍熙, 陈镜全. 下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者血清细胞间黏附分子-1水平对术后再狭窄的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 26-32.
[11] 马蓓蓓, 高翔, 黄露, 汪阳, 柳莹, 卢光东, 王雪梅. 社会支持在介入治疗后脑卒中主要照顾者负性情绪和照顾准备度间的中介作用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 46-54.
[12] 刘莹, 陈中闯, 陈雪英, 程云涛, 甘立军. 腔内影像学与功能学评估指导下的西罗莫司涂层球囊在冠心病中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 120-125.
[13] 魏伟. 老年危重症患者并发急性肾损伤的危险因素的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2025, 11(06): 365-369.
[14] 徐林, 简讯, 刘道权, 易东, 鄢华. 人工智能在心脑血管内介入诊疗中的应用进展——从单一影像模式到多模态影像融合[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 334-341.
[15] 李扬, 王阳, 师瑞, 张潇, 李德帅, 魏东. 急性重症颅内静脉窦血栓患者血管内介入治疗的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 388-396.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?