Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2014, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (04): 210-214. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.04.004

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Xinsen Xu1, Wei Chen1, Lingqiang Zhang1, Xiaogang Zhang1, Xuemin Liu1, Liang Yu1, Yi Lyu1, Chang Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2014-05-26 Online:2014-08-10 Published:2014-08-10
  • Contact: Chang Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Chang, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the application value of hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 54 patients with HCC undergoing radical hepatectomy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2002 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different surgical procedure, the patients were divided into hepatectomy with Glissonean pedicle transection group (Glisson group) and hepatectomy with Pringle maneuver (Pringle group) with 27 cases in each group. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. In Glisson group, hepatectomy was performed after Glissonean pedicles were dissected and occluded. In Pringle group, hepatectomy was performed after the first porta was occluded using Pringle maneuver. The intraoperative situation, the variation of liver function and incidence of complications after operation of two groups were observed. The patients received follow-up after operation and survival analysis was conducted. The comparison of measurement data between two groups was conducted using t test, the comparison of rates using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test, and the survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

The mean of intraoperative blood loss in Glisson group [(135±57) ml] was significantly less than that in Pringle group[(248±87) ml] (t=-5.62, P<0.05). The total bilirubin (TB) level 1 d after operation in Glisson group [(23±5) μmol/L] was significantly lower than that in Pringle group [(34±5) μmol/L] (t=-8.08, P<0.05). In Glisson group, postoperative hemorrhage was observed in 2 cases and infection in 2 cases. In Pringle group, postoperative hemorrhage was observed in 3 cases, infection in 1 case, and bile leakage in 1 case. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative complications between two groups (P>0.05). The 1-, 3-, 5-year cumulative survival rates were 89%, 50%, 39% in Glisson group and were 82%, 55%, 41% in Pringle group. The 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival rates were 89%, 43%, 34% in Glisson group and were 82%, 47%, 41% in Pringle group. No significant difference was observed in the cumulative survival rates and disease free survival rates between two groups (χ2=0.001, 0.011; P>0.05).

Conclusion

Hepatectomy using Glissonean pedicle transection is a safe, effective, and feasible surgical procedure for HCC with advantages of less blood loss, milder liver damage.

Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Hepatectomy, Glissonean pedicle transection method, Pringle maneuver vascular control, Blood loss, surgical, Liver function tests, Reperfusion injury

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd