Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02): 105-109. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.02.010

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of fusion imaging in intraoperative instant curative effect evaluation of thermal ablation for primary liver cancer

Man Zhang1, Kai Li1, Zhongzhen Su1, Qingjin Zeng1, Liujun Li1, Jiaxin Chen1, Shumin Lyu1, Erjiao Xu1,(), Rongqin Zheng1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2015-12-25 Online:2016-04-10 Published:2016-04-10
  • Contact: Erjiao Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Erjiao, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the application value of fusion imaging in intraoperative instant curative effect evaluation of thermal ablation for primary liver cancer (liver cancer).

Methods

Forty-six patients with liver cancer (71 lesions in total) undergoing ultrasound-guided thermal ablation in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between December 2014 and March 2015 were recruited in this prospective study. Forty-two patients were males and 4 were females, aged between 36 and 82 years with a median age of 54 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. After thermal ablation, clinical efficacy was preferentially assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion imaging technique for all liver cancer lesions. If the fusion imaging was not successfully performed, simple CEUS was utilized for evaluation. According to the evaluation methods, the patients were divided into the fusion imaging group and CEUS group. The lesion size, supplementary and complete ablation rates in two groups were observed. The lesion diameter between two groups was compared using Z test and the ratio was compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

Fusion imaging was utilized for instant curative effect evaluation in 25 patients with 31 lesions, and simple CEUS was used for evaluation in 26 cases with 40 lesions. In the fusion imaging group, 58% (18/31) of the lesions were ≥20 mm in diameter, significantly higher compared with 30% (12/40) in the CEUS group (χ2=5.638, P<0.05). The supplementary ablation rate in the fusion imaging group was 52% (16/31), significantly higher than 22%(9/40) in the CEUS group (χ2=6.489, P<0.05). The complete ablation rate was 100% (31/31) in the fusion imaging group and 95%(38/40) in the CEUS group , and no significant difference was observed (P=0.501).

Conclusions

Both fusion imaging and simple CEUS are important methods for intraoperative instant curative effect evaluation. Fusion imaging has higher accuracy for the relatively large lesions and help to enhance the complete ablation rate.

Key words: Ultrasonography, Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Ablation techniques, Comparative effectiveness research

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd