Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (06): 469-473. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.06.012

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in laparoscopic difficult cholecystectomy

Dianqi Li1, Dong Liu2, Jian Li1, Xiaoguang Zhao1,(), Hao Wang1   

  1. 1. Department I of Surgery, No.413 Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Zhoushan 316000, China
    2. Department of Surgery, Navy Peace Ark Hospital of People's Liberation Army, Zhoushan 316000, China
  • Received:2017-09-03 Online:2017-12-10 Published:2017-12-10
  • Contact: Xiaoguang Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Xiaoguang, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy (LSC) in laparoscopic difficult cholecystectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 58 patients who were converted to other operation procedure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in No.413 Hospital of People's Liberation Army between January 2011 and November 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different converted operation, the patients were divided into LSC group and open cholecystectomy group (OC group). There were 31 cases in LSC group, 13 males and 18 females, with an average age of (57±18) years and 27 in OC group, 12 males and 15 females, with an average age of (54±16) years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Patients in LSC group were converted to laparoscopic antegrade or retrograde cholecystectomy, and the posterior gallbladder wall was retained. Patients in OC group underwent OC through the right subcostal incision. All the patients were followed up after operation. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative pain score, drainage duration and length of hospital stay in both groups were compared by t test, and the incidence of postoperative complications was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

The operation time and intraoperative bleeding volume in LSC group were (68±10) min and (56±11) ml, significantly lower than (89±13) min and (81±28) ml in OC group (t= -7.2, -4.5; P<0.05). The postoperative pain score, drainage duration and length of hospital stay in LSC group were (3.1±0.8) min, (61±12) h and (4.8±1.8) d, significantly lower than (5.4±0.9) min, (73±14) h and (7.5±2.3) d in OC group (t=-10.3, -3.6, -5.0; P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was 10%(3/31) in LSC group and 22%(6/27) in OC group, and no significant difference was observed (χ2=1.73, P>0.05). No postoperative death occurred in both groups.

Conclusions

For patients undergoing laparoscopic difficult cholecystectomy, compared with OC, LSC presents advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding volume and higher operation safety which are beneficial to the postoperative recovery of patients.

Key words: Laparoscopes, Cholecystectomy, Blood loss, surgical, Postoperative complications

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd