Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (05): 405-409. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.05.007

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tunnel-building laparoscopic splenectomy in treatment of giant spleen

Yong Tang1, Chidan Wan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
  • Received:2019-05-20 Online:2019-10-10 Published:2019-10-10
  • Contact: Chidan Wan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wan Chidan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of tunnel-building laparoscopic splenectomy (TLS) in the treatment of giant spleen.

Methods

Clinical data of 113 patients undergoing single TLS in Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January 2017 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 69 patients were male and 44 female, aged (47±14) years on average. According to the spleen size and weight, all patients were divided into the giant spleen group (n=42) and non-giant spleen group (n=71). Intraoperatively, the retrosplenic tunnel was established through the gap between the posterior and inferior margins of splenic pedicle. The splenic pedicle was initially dissected and subsequently the perisplenic ligament was treated. The perioperative conditions, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, spleen extraction time, were statistically compared between two groups by t test. The rate comparison was performed by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

All patients completed the operation successfully, and no case was converted to open surgery during the operation. In the giant spleen group, the operation time and spleen extraction time were (83±5) min and (28±5) min, significantly longer than (63±8) min and (15±3) min in the non-giant spleen group (t=17.860, 15.464; P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the intraoperative blood loss, the first intaking time after surgery, length of postoperative hospital stay and incidence of perioperative complications between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

TLS is not only suitable for routine splenectomy, but also safe and efficacious for giant splenectomy.

Key words: Laparoscopes, Splenectomy, Megalosplenia

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd