Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (06): 542-546. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.06.017

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of clinical efficacy between LCBDE and EST for choledocholithiasis

Shizhou Liu1, Yanzhang Tian1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Shanxi Dayi Hospital of Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030000, China
  • Received:2019-07-20 Online:2019-12-10 Published:2019-12-10
  • Contact: Yanzhang Tian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tian Yanzhang, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in the treatment of common bile duct stones.

Methods

Clinical data of 80 patients with choledocholithiasis who were diagnosed and treated in Shanxi Dayi Hospital of Shanxi University from January 2015 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different treatments, all the patients were divided into the LCBDE and EST groups, with 40 cases in each group. In LCBDE group, 22 patients were male and 18 female, aged (48±2) years on average. In EST group, 24 patients were male and 16 female, aged (46±2) years on average. Perioperative conditions were observed in two groups. The operation time and hospitalization expenses between two groups were statistically compared by t test. The surgical success rate and incidence of postoperative complications between two groups were compared by Chi-square test.

Results

The operation time and hospitalization expenses in LCBDE group were (103.2±2.3) min and (41 310±220) Yuan, significantly higher than (88.8±2.4) min and (34 480±100) Yuan in EST group (t=27.74, 13.61; P<0.05). The surgical success rate in LCBDE group was 98%(39/40) and 95%(38/40) in EST group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=0.17, P>0.05). In LCBDE group, biliary leakage occurred in 2 cases, acute pancreatitis in 1 case and gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 1 case. In EST group, acute pancreatitis occurred in 3 cases, gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 1 case and gastrointestinal perforation in 2 cases. The incidence of postoperative complications was 10%(4/40) in LCBDE group and 15%(6/40) in EST group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=0.46, P>0.05). No perioperative death occurred in two groups.

Conclusions

Both LCBDE and EST are safe and efficacious for treating common bile duct stones with slight trauma and mild complications. LCBDE retains the physiological function of Oddi sphincter, which is especially suitable for patients with duodenal stenosis and Oddi sphincter dysfunction, and yields low cost.

Key words: Choledocholithiasis, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Sphincterotomy, endoscopic, Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd