Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (06): 547-551. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.06.011

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of safety and short-term efficacy between laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy

Yibo Liu1, Xingkai Meng1, Jianjun Ren2, Jun Li1, Jianliang Qiao1, Junjing Zhang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China; Key Laboratory of Surgery, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010030, China
  • Received:2020-08-20 Online:2020-12-10 Published:2020-12-10
  • Contact: Junjing Zhang

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 125 patients who underwent hepatectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different surgical procedure, all patients were divided into the laparoscopic hepatectomy (n=60) and open hepatectomy groups (n=65). In the laparoscopic hepatectomy group, 35 patients were male and 25 female, aged 16-75 years, with a median age of 55 years. In the open hepatectomy group, 37 patients were male and 28 female, aged 15-76 years, with a median age of 54 years. The operation time, age were compared between two groups by t test. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

All patients in two groups successfully completed the operation. In the laparoscopic hepatectomy group, 5 cases were converted to open hepatectomy with a conversion rate of 8%(5/60). No death case was reported. The average operation time in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group was (145±53) min, significantly longer than (128±30) min in the open hepatectomy group (t=2.267, P<0.05). In the laparoscopic hepatectomy group, the postoperative exhaust time, first off-bed activity time, analgesic use time, abdominal drainage time and postoperative length of hospital stay were (2.5±0.7), (1.7±0.6), (2.1±0.7), (5.1±2.2) and (6.4±2.6) d, significantly shorter than (3.0±0.7), (3.0±0.7), (2.8±1.5), (7.0±1.7) and (8.8±2.1) d in the open hepatectomy group (t=-4.195, -11.164, -4.024, -5.456, -5.701; P<0.05). In the laparoscopic hepatectomy group, 2 cases developed postoperative bleeding,3 cases of bile leakage and 2 cases of infection, and it was 4, 8 and 6 cases accordingly in the open hepatectomy group. The incidence of postoperative complications in laparoscopic hepatectomy group was significantly lower than that in the open hepatectomy group (χ2=5.008, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with open hepatectomy, laparoscopic hepatectomy has advantages in terms of higher safety, better short-term efficacy, fewer postoperative complications, less invasiveness and faster postoperative recovery.

Key words: Laparoscopes, Hepatectomy, Liver neoplasms

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd