Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06): 860-867. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2025.06.008

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles    

Construction of prediction model for pathologic complete response of hepatocellular carcinoma after neoadjuvant/conversion therapy based on imageology and clinical features

Shaojian Huang, Hanbiao Liang, Qingping Li, Shanhua Tang, Qingyan Li, Zhixi Li, Can Huang, Xiaozhen Wang, Canhui Chen, Kai Wang, Chuanjiang Li()   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2025-06-06 Online:2025-12-10 Published:2025-12-01
  • Contact: Chuanjiang Li

Abstract:

Objective

To construct a prediction model for pathologic complete response (pCR) in liver cancer patients after neoadjuvant/conversion therapy followed by sequential surgical resection based on CT radiomics and clinical features, and to evaluate its predictive value.

Methods

Clinical data of 74 liver cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant/conversion therapy, followed by sequential surgical resection in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University from December 2019 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 65 patients were male and 9 female, aged from 22 to 74 years, with a median age of 52 years. According to postoperative tumor specimens (n=80), they were randomly divided into the training (n=40) and validation sets (n=40). Feature indexes were extracted and screened based on CT radiomics of the patients, and the radiomics score (Rad-score) was obtained. A nomogram prediction model for pCR was constructed based on multivariate Logistic analysis of clinical factors and CT radiomics in the training set. The consistency of nomogram prediction model was evaluated by C-index and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Bootstrap method was used for internal verification to evaluate the accuracy of calibration curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was utilized to evaluate the degree of discrimination of nomogram prediction model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was drawn to evaluate clinical utility of the prediction model. Clinical impact curve (CIC) was delineated to evaluate clinical effectiveness of the prediction model. The diagnostic efficiency of the prediction model was assessed by Delong test. The visual graph of Rad-score was drawn to display the diagnostic performance of the radiomics model.

Results

Multivariate Logistic analysis showed that positive AFP after treatment was an independent influencing factor of pCR (OR=5.250, 95%CI: 1.069-25.789; P<0.05). A total of 4 148 radiomic features were extracted by Radiomics, and 11 radiomic features were screened by Lasso analysis and 10-fold cross-validation. AFP combined with Rad-score were used to construct a nomogram prediction model for pCR (combined model). The calibration curve of the combined model yielded high consistency between the predicted and actual pCR probability. The C-index in the training and validation sets was 0.887 and 0.895. Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a high goodness of fit (χ2=5.96, 4.78; both P>0.05). Internal verification using Bootstrap method in the training and validation sets demonstrated that the average absolute error of the calibration curve of the combined model was 0.063 and 0.040, with high accuracy. DCA and CIC analyses showed that the combined model possessed high clinical utility and clinical effectiveness rate. In the training and validation sets, the AUC of the combined model was 0.887 and 0.895. The AUC of clinical and radiomics models in the training set was 0.887, 0.667 and 0.857, respectively. The diagnostic efficiency of combined model was significantly better than that of clinical model (Z=2.797, P=0.005 2). The diagnostic efficiency of combined model in the validation set was also significantly better than that of clinical model (Z=2.027, P=0.042 7). Rad-score waterfall plot revealed the proportion of incorrect prediction was not high, and the visualization effect was good.

Conclusions

The combined model based on CT radiomics and AFP possesses high prediction value for pCR after neoadjuvant/conversion therapy followed by sequential surgical resection for liver cancer and yields the optimal diagnostic efficiency.

Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Neoadjuvant therapy, Conversion therapy, Radiomics model, Pathologic complete response, Nomogram prediction model

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd