Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2014, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (01): 37-40. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2014.01.010

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with biliary calculus

Zheng Su1, Bo Liu2, Jianping Liu1,(), Huayao Zhang1, Zejian Lyu3, Xiang Zhang4, Lujing Li4, Gaojie Liu3, Xiao Ye1, Qingjia Ou1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2013-11-10 Online:2014-02-10 Published:2014-02-10
  • Contact: Jianping Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Jianping, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the clinical value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the preoperative evaluation of patients with biliary calculus.

Methods

Clinical data of 70 patients with biliary calculus in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2012 to June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 38 males and 32 females with age ranging from 18 to 87 years old and the median age of 52 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. The patients underwent ultrasound examination and MRCP before operation. The surgical procedures were cholecystectomy + bile duct exploration and the intraoperative exploration result was the gold standard of diagnosis for biliary calculus and biliary tract variations. The detectable rate of biliary calculus and biliary tract variations by two methods were compared using Chi-square test and Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

The detectable rate of gallstones was 93% (62/67) by ultrasound and was 79% (53/67) by MRCP, where significant difference was observed (χ2=4.968, P<0.05). The detectable rate of common bile duct stones was 61% (17/28) by ultrasound and was 86% (24/28) by MRCP, where significant difference was observed (χ2=4.462, P<0.05). The detectable rate of the left and right hepatic duct stones was 2/5 by ultrasound and was 4/5 by MRCP, where no significant difference was observed (P>0.05). The detectable rate of intrahepatic bile duct stones was 36% (4/11) by ultrasound and was 73% (8/11) by MRCP, where no significant difference was observed (P>0.05). The detectable rate of biliary tract variations was 2/8 by ultrasound and was 7/8 by MRCP, where significant difference was observed (P<0.05).

Conclusions

MRCP is superior to ultrasound examination in the detection of common bile duct stones and biliary tract variations. It can be a common practice in the preoperative evaluation of patients with biliary calculus when circumstances allow.

Key words: Cholelithiasis, Cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance, Ultrasonography

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd