Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (01): 16-20. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.01.005

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application value of hepatectomy via anterior approach in surgery of primary liver cancer

Zheng Su1, Bo Liu2, Jianping Liu3,(), Huayao Zhang3, Shanglin Yang3, Gaojie Liu4   

  1. 1. Comprehensive Department, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Lingnan Branch, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510530, China
    3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
    4. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2015-12-20 Online:2016-02-10 Published:2016-02-10
  • Contact: Jianping Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Jianping, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the application value of hepatectomy via anterior approach in the surgery of primary liver cancer.

Methods

Clinical data of 138 patients with primary liver cancer undergoing hepatectomy in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital and Lingnan Branch, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2011 to June 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 97 males and 41 females, aged 36 to 87 years with a median age of 52 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. The patients were divided into the anterior approach hepatectomy group (anterior group, n=63) and traditional approach hepatectomy group (traditional group, n=75). Preoperative general data, intra-, post-operative parameters of two groups were compared using t test or Chi-square test.

Results

In the anterior group, the percentage of patients with Child-Pugh liver function grade B and C, multiple tumors and tumor diameter > 10 cm was 73% (46/63), 44% (28/63) and 16%(16/63) respectively, which were significantly higher compared with 37% (28/75), 17% (13/75) and 5%(4/75) in the traditional group (χ2=20.444, 12.051, 8.144; P<0.05). In the anterior group, the average intraoperative blood loss, transfusion volume of plasma and red blood cells were (428±17), (470±14) and (300±7) ml, which were significantly lower compared with (517±11), (630±15) and (420±11) ml in the traditional group (t=-6.097, -2.927, -8.928; P<0.05). The rate of postoperative complications in anterior group was 10% (6/63), which was significantly lower compared with 17% (13/75) in the traditional group (χ2=1.759, P<0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with poor liver function, multiple and large tumors, hepatectomy via anterior approach is a preferential surgical procedure rather than the traditional approach hepatectomy.

Key words: Anterior approach, Traditional approach, Liver neoplasms, Hepatectomy

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd