Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03): 187-191. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.03.009

Special Issue:

• Clinical Researches • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Ya Cheng1, Weidong Jia1,(), Geliang Xu1, Jinliang Ma1, Xiaofei Qiao1, Yongsheng Ge1, Jihai Yu1, Wenbin Liu1   

  1. 1. Department of Liver Surgery, the Key Laboratory of Anhui province, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2017-03-17 Online:2017-06-10 Published:2017-06-10
  • Contact: Weidong Jia
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jia Weidong, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the application value of the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the perioperative period of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Clinical data of 393 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy in Anhui Provincial Hospital between January 2010 and May 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different processing methods during perioperative period, the patients were divided into the ERAS group (n=128) and control group (n=265). In the ERAS group, 108 cases were males and 20 females, aged (53±11) years old on average, and the patients received the treatment with the concept of ERAS in the perioperative period. In the control group, 226 cases were males and 39 females, aged (54±11) years old on average, and the patients received the traditional treatment in the perioperative period. Postoperative conditions were observed in two groups. The data including postoperative length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense between two groups were compared using t test. The rate was compared using Pearson Chi-square test, continuous correction Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

The percentage of early postoperative off-bed activity and pain numerical rating scale (NRS) score≤3 at postoperative 48 h in the ERAS group was respectively 47.7% and 74.2%, significantly higher than 9.8% and 32.8% in the control group (χ2=71.717, 59.464; P<0.05). The intestinal exhaust time in the ERAS group was (39±16) d, significant earlier than (47±17) d in the control group (t=-3.306, P<0.05). The postoperative length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense in the ERAS group was respectively (7.8±2.5) d and (2.7±0.8) ×104 yuan, significantly less than (8.7±4.2) d and (2.9±1.0)×104 yuan in the control group (t=-2.677, -2.090; P<0.05).

Conclusions

It is safe and efficacious to use the concept of ERAS in the perioperative period of hepatectomy for HCC. It can accelerate the postoperative recovery of the patients, shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce hospitalization expense without increasing the mortality and readmission rate.

Key words: Carcinoma, hepatocellular, Hepatectomy, Perioperative care, Enhanced recovery after surgery

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 020-85252582 85252369 E-mail: chinaliver@126.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd