切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (02) : 123 -128. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2012.02.012

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

Ki-67在肝细胞肝癌患者根治性肝切除术后短期肿瘤复发预测中的价值
庞旭峰1, 王祖森1, 吴力群1,()   
  1. 1. 266003 青岛大学医学院附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-12 出版日期:2012-10-10
  • 通信作者: 吴力群

Significance of Ki-67 expression in the prognosis of patients with short-term recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection hepatectomy

Xu-feng PANG1, Zu-sen WANG1, Li-qun WU1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary, The Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2012-08-12 Published:2012-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Li-qun WU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: WU Li-qun, Email:
引用本文:

庞旭峰, 王祖森, 吴力群. Ki-67在肝细胞肝癌患者根治性肝切除术后短期肿瘤复发预测中的价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2012, 01(02): 123-128.

Xu-feng PANG, Zu-sen WANG, Li-qun WU. Significance of Ki-67 expression in the prognosis of patients with short-term recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection hepatectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2012, 01(02): 123-128.

目的

探讨Ki-67在肝细胞肝癌(肝癌)患者肿瘤组织中的表达情况及其在肿瘤完全切除(R0)肝切除术后短期肿瘤复发预测中的价值。

方法

回顾性研究2003年1月至2008年12月在青岛大学医学院附属医院肝胆外科行R0肝切除术的290例肝癌患者的临床资料。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。男性242例,女性48例,中位年龄55岁。另取81例癌旁组织标本和79例肝硬化组织标本作对照。收集患者的血清病毒学结果、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、肿瘤直径、肿瘤数目,有否卫星灶、血管癌栓、肝被膜侵犯、区域淋巴结转移及肿瘤组织学分化程度等临床病理学资料,并收集术后随访患者的存活时间、肿瘤复发情况等随访资料。根据随访结果将患者分为复发组和非复发组,复发组进一步分为短期复发组(复发时间≤6个月)和非短期复发组(复发时间>6个月)。应用组织芯片技术和免疫组织化学方法检测标本中Ki-67的表达情况。采用χ2检验比较各组Ki-67阳性表达率的差异,应用Cox比例风险回归模型分析Ki-67阳性表达对肝癌术后短期肿瘤复发预测的价值。

结果

所有患者接受了随访,中位随访时间42个月(3~105个月)。随访期间共有190例(65.5%)确诊为肝癌复发转移。短期复发组患者59例,占复发组的31.1%。短期复发组中,肝外转移者20例(33.9%),与非短期复发组18例(13.7%)相比,前者肝外转移发生率明显升高,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.331,P=0.001)。短期复发组病死率94.9%(56/59)明显高于非短期复发组67.2%(88/131)(χ2=20.703,P<0.001)。肝癌组Ki-67阳性表达206例(71.0%),对照组组织均不表达,差异有统计意义(χ2=209.610,P<0.001);短期复发组与非短期复发组的Ki-67阳性表达率分别为84.7%(50/59)和70.2%(92/131),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.540,P=0.033)。肿瘤直径>5 cm、肿瘤数目多、有卫星灶、有血管癌栓、区域淋巴结转移、组织学检查为中低分化癌和Ki-67阳性表达的患者术后短期肿瘤复发率明显增高,比较差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05)。Cox比例风险回归模型分析结果示肿瘤直径、血管癌栓、组织学分化程度和Ki-67阳性表达是肝癌患者R0肝切除术后短期肿瘤复发的独立危险因素。

结论

肝癌组织中Ki-67的阳性表达率增高,Ki-67是预测R0肝切除术后短期肿瘤复发的重要指标,Ki-67阳性提示术后的短期肿瘤复发率高且预后差。

Objective

To study the expression of Ki-67 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its significance in the prognosis of patients with short-term recurrence of HCC after radical resection(R0) hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 290 HCC patients with R0 hepatectomy in the department of hepatobiliary of the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University from January 2003 to December 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Local ethical committee approval had been received and that the informed consent of all participating subjects was obtained. Two hundred and forty two patients were males and 48 were females. The mean age of the patients was 55 years old. The other 81 adjacent tissues samples and 79 cirrhotic tissues samples were collected as the control group. Clinical and pathological information was reviewed such as serum markers of hepatic viral infection, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), tumor size, multiple lesion, satellite focus, vascular invasion, liver capsule invasion, region lymph node metastasis, and histological differentiation. The patients were followed up after operation. The data of survival time and tumor recurrence were collected. According to the results of follow-up, the patients were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group, and the patients in the recurrence group were further divided into short-term recurrence group (recurrence time≤6 months) and non-short-term recurrence group (recurrence time>6 months). The expressions of Ki-67 in these tissues were examined by tissue microarray technology and immunohistochemistry methods. The Chi-square test was used to examine the difference of expression of Ki-67 between these groups and Cox multiple regression model was applied to analyze the positive expression of Ki-67 in the prognosis of patients with short-term recurrence of HCC after R0 hepatectomy.

Results

All the patients were followed up with the median follow-up time was 42 months (3-105 months). One hundred and ninety patients (65.5%) were diagnosed recurrence with metastasis during the follow-up period. There were 59 patients (31.1% of the recurrence group) in the short-term recurrence group. There were 20 cases (33.9%) with extrahepatic metastasis in the short-term recurrence group, while 18 cases (13.7%) in the non-short-term recurrence group. The incidence rate of extrahepatic metastasis of patients in short-term recurrence group was much higher. There was significant difference between two groups (χ2=10.331, P=0.001) . The mortality rate in the short-term recurrence group was 94.9% (56/59) , which was higher than that in non-short-term recurrence group 67.2% (88/131) (χ2=20.703, P<0.001) . The positive expression rate of Ki-67 in HCC tissues was 71.0% (206/290), while no expression of Ki-67 in the adjacent non-cancerous tissues and cirrhotic tissues (χ2=209.610, P<0.001). The positive expression rate of Ki-67 was 84.7% (50/59) in the short-term recurrence group and 70.2% (92/131) in the non-short-term recurrence group (χ2=4.540, P=0.033). The short-term recurrence rate after resection was found much higher in patients with tumor size>5 cm, multiple lesion, satellite focus, vascular invasion, liver capsule invasion, region lymph node metastasis, and middle, poor histological differentiation and positive Ki-67 expression (all in P<0.05). The tumor size, vascular invasion, differentiation of histological examination and Ki-67 expression were independent factors for the patients with short-term recurrence of HCC after R0 hepatectomy.

Conclusions

The positive expression rate of Ki-67 is higher in HCC patients’ tissues, which is an important prognostic factor for patients with short-term recurrence of HCC after R0 hepatectomy. The positive expression of Ki-67 is associated with high incidence of short term recurrence and poor prognosis in HCC patients following resection.

图1 肝癌组和对照组的Ki-67表达(免疫组化染色法,×200)
表1 肝细胞癌患者R0切除术后短期肿瘤复发与临床病理学因素的关系[例(%)]
表2 肝细胞肝癌患者R0切除术后短期肿瘤复发的独立危险因素
[1]
Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822):1245-1255.
[2]
Hermanek, Wittekind C. Residual tumor(R) classification and prognosis. Semin Surg Oncol, 1994, 10(1):12-20.
[3]
Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol, 2000, 182(3):311-322.
[4]
段建中,王殿栋. Ki-67基因在肿瘤发生发展中作用的研究进展.中国肿瘤外科杂志, 2011, 3(1):50-51, 57.
[5]
吴力群,邱法波,张顺,等.原发性肝细胞癌肝切除术后短期复发的危险因素.中华外科杂志, 2011, 49(9):784-788.
[6]
Nguyen XC, Lee WW, Chung JH, et al. FDP uptake, glucose transporter type 1, and Ki-67 expression in non-small-cell lung cancer: correlations and prognostic values. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 62(2):214-219.
[7]
Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, et al. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol, 1984, 133(4):1710-1715.
[8]
江忠清,朱凤川,曲军英,等.宫颈癌MMP-9表达与肿瘤血管生成、癌细胞增殖及侵袭转移的关系.癌症, 2003, 22(2):178-184.
[9]
沈先锋,张志伟,梅洪亮,等.肝细胞性肝癌及门静脉癌栓差异表达蛋白质组分析及意义.中华实验外科杂志, 2009, 26(12):1631-1633.
[10]
符炜,穆毅,路逵阳.肝细胞癌中Ki-67的表达和MVD的相互关系.安徽医科大学学报, 2004, 39(6):458-462.
[11]
宋德霸,赵龙栓,王万鹏,等. MGMT和Ki-67抗原在肝细胞癌组织中的表达及意义.肿瘤基础与临床, 2009, 22(6):461-463.
[12]
王凝芳,赵荣宇,冯雪冬,等. Ki-67在肝细胞肝癌中的表达及其临床意义.大连大学学报, 2003, 24(2):71-73, 79.
[13]
Mohamed WS, Omar MM, Khayri TM, et al. Assessment of the proliferative marker Ki-67 and p53 protein expression in HBV-and HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma cases in Egypt. Int J Health Sci, 2008, 2(1):27-34.
[14]
Wu JC, Huang YH, Chau GY, et al. Risk factors for early and late recurrence in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol, 2009, 51(5):890-897.
[15]
吴力群,邱法波,张顺,等.原发性肝细胞癌R0切除标准的探讨.中国实用外科杂志, 2011, 31(11):1027-1030.
[16]
Stroescu C, Dragnea A, Ivanov B, et al. Expression of p53, Bcl-2, VEGF, Ki67 and PCNA and prognostic significance in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2008, 17(4):411-417.
[17]
徐为,李望,钱国伟,等.阻断Spl蛋白对Ki-67基因转录的影响.中华实验外科杂志, 2011, 28(4):605-607.
[18]
Rahmanzadeh R, Rai P, Celli JP, et al. Ki-67 as a molecular target for therapy in an in vitro three-dimensional model for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res, 2010, 70(22):9234-9242.
[1] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[2] 马中正, 杨云川, 马翔, 周迟, 丁丁, 霍俊一, 徐楠, 崔培元, 周磊. 胰腺癌双硫死亡相关的lncRNA预后模型的构建及免疫反应研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 368-376.
[3] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[4] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[5] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[6] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 肖丹, 陈辰, 查晔军, 公茂琪, 花克涵, 孙伟桐, 蒋协远. 改良松解术治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的疗效及危险因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-263.
[11] 唐诗, 薛传优, 叶兴, 张鸿举, 戴瑞. 急性病毒性肝炎患者血脂、血糖、蛋白、尿酸变化特点及其与预后的关联[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 396-399.
[12] 李素娟, 王文玲, 董洪敏, 李小凯, 黄思成, 王刚. 多原发与单原发大肠腺癌的预后分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 407-412.
[13] 杭丽, 张耀辉, 孙文恺. 参菝抗瘤液对结直肠腺瘤性息肉术后肠道功能、炎症指标及复发情况的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 413-416.
[14] 孙文恺, 沈青, 杭丽, 张迎春. 纤维蛋白原与清蛋白比值、中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值、C反应蛋白与溃疡性结肠炎病情评估和预后的关系[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 426-431.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要