切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (05) : 285 -288. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2013.05.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

肝门部胆管癌患者外科治疗92例临床疗效分析
周光文1()   
  1. 1. 200080 上海交通大学附属第一人民医院外科
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-03 出版日期:2013-10-10
  • 通信作者: 周光文

Clinical efficacy of surgical treatments for 92 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Guang-wen ZHOU1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Shanghai First People′s Hospital, Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China
  • Received:2013-06-03 Published:2013-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Guang-wen ZHOU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: ZHOU Guang-wen, Email:
引用本文:

周光文. 肝门部胆管癌患者外科治疗92例临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2013, 02(05): 285-288.

Guang-wen ZHOU. Clinical efficacy of surgical treatments for 92 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(05): 285-288.

目的

探讨肝门部胆管癌患者外科治疗的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2002年1月至2008年12月在上海交通大学附属第一人民医院外科收治的92例肝门部胆管癌患者临床资料。其中男48例,女44例;年龄(64±12)岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。92例患者中行肿瘤切除术35例,包括根治性切除术21例,姑息性切除术14例;行减黄术6例;行介入治疗43例,包括经内镜下逆行性胰胆管造影术(ERCP)胆道内引流41例和经皮经肝胆道引流术(PTCD)2例;行剖腹探查术8例。患者出院后接受随访,根据随访结果,记录患者的生存情况,绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。不同外科治疗方法的生存分析与比较采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。

结果

92例患者中84例随访资料完整,随访率为91%(84/92)。随访时间为2个月至3.5年,中位随访时间为26个月。肿瘤切除术患者中位生存期为22个月,其中根治性切除术患者为25个月,姑息性切除术患者为10个月;减黄术患者为14个月;介入治疗患者为9个月;剖腹探查术患者为4.5个月。肿瘤切除术、减黄术、介入治疗、剖腹探查术患者的生存率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=17.46,P<0.05)。肿瘤切除术患者的生存率明显高于介入治疗和剖腹探查术患者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.76,15.38;P<0.05)。根治性切除术患者的生存率明显高于姑息性切除术患者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=17.25,P<0.05)。

结论

肝门部胆管癌患者外科治疗方法包括肿瘤切除术(根治性切除术、姑息性切除术)、减黄术、介入治疗及剖腹探查术等,其中肿瘤切除术可能有较好的临床疗效。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of surgical treatments for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Clinical data of 92 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma in Department of Surgery, Shanghai First People′s Hospital, Jiaotong University from January 2002 to December 2008 were studied retrospectively. There were 48 males and 44 females with mean age of(64±12) years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. Thirty-five patients underwent tumor resection, including 21 cases of radical resection, 14 cases of palliative resection, 6 cases of jaundice-reducing operation and 43 cases of interventional therapy [41 cases of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) and 2 cases of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage(PTCD)], and 8 cases of exploratory laparotomy. All the patients were followed up after being discharged from the hospital. The survival of patients were recorded according to the follow-up data and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were drawn. The survival of patients with different surgical treatments were analyzed and compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test.

Results

Complete follow-up data were obtained in 84 patients with the follow-up rate of 91% (84/92). The follow-up duration was from 2 months to 3.5 years with median of 26 months. The median survival time of patients with tumor resection was 22 months, which was 25 months for patients with radical resection, 10 months for patients with palliative resection. The median survival time of patients with jaundice-reducing operation, interventional therapy, exploratory laparotomy were 14, 9, 4.5 months respectively. There was significant difference among the 4 surgical treatments(χ2=17.46, P<0.05). The survival rate of patients with tumor resection was significantly higher than that of patients with interventional therapy and exploratory laparotomy. There was significant difference between two treatments(χ2=13.76, 15.38; P<0.05). The survival rate of patients with radical resection was significantly higher than that of patients with palliative resection. There was significant difference between two treatments (χ2=17.25, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The surgical treatment for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma includes tumor resection (radical resection and palliative resection), jaundice-reducing operation, interventional therapy and exploratory laparotomy. Tumor resection may be the optimal choice to achieve better curative effect.

表1 35例肝门部胆管癌患者的具体肿瘤切除术式(例)
表2 肝门部胆管癌患者不同治疗方法的生存情况
[1]
Shimizu H,Sawada S,Kimura F, et al. Clinical significance of biliary vascular anatomy of the right liver for hilar cholangiocarcinoma applied to left hemihepatectomy. Ann Surg, 2009, 249(3): 435-439.
[2]
de Jong MC,Marques H,Clary BM, et al. The impact of portal vein resection on outcomes for hilar cholangiocarcinoma:a multi-institutional analysis of 305 cases. Cancer, 2012, 118(19): 4737-4747.
[3]
Lee SG,Song GW,Hwang S, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2010, 17(4): 476-489.
[4]
周光文.肝门胆管癌根治性手术中应关注的若干问题.国际外科学杂志, 2011, 38(5): 293-295.
[5]
Hemming AW,Reed AI,Fujita S, et al. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 2005, 241(5): 693-699.
[6]
周宁新,黄志强,张文智,等. 402例肝门部胆管癌临床分型、手术方式与远期疗效的综合分析.中华外科杂志, 2006, 44(23): 1599-1603.
[7]
Shah SK,Costamagna G. Can unilateral stent placement be adequate in patients with Klatskin tumors of Bismuth-type Ⅲ and Ⅳ? Gastrointest Endosc, 2001, 54(6): 804-805.
[8]
Seyama Y,Kubota K,Sano K, et al. Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(1): 73-83.
[9]
周光文.肝门胆管癌根治性手术中联合脏器和血管切除的临床价值.国际外科学杂志, 2013, 40(5): 350-352.
[10]
Clary B,Jarnigan W,Pitt H, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg, 2004, 8(3): 298-302.
[11]
Malhi H,Gores GJ. Review article: the modern diagnosis and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2006, 23(9): 1287-1296.
[12]
Cha JH,Han JK,Kim TK, et al. Preoperative evaluation of Klatskin tumor: accuracy of spiral CT in determining vascular invasion as a sign of unresectability. Abdom Imaging, 2000, 25(5): 500-507.
[13]
Capussotti L,Muratore A,Polastri R, et al. Liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: in-hospital mortality and longterm survival. J Am Coll Surg, 2002, 195(5): 641-647.
[14]
Lygidakis NJ,Sgourakis GJ,Dedemadi GV, et al. Long-term results following resectional surgery for Klatskin tumors:a twenty-year personal experience. Hepatogastroenterology, 2001, 48(37): 95-101.
[15]
Kawasaki S,Imamura H,Kobayashi A, et al. Results of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg, 2003, 238(1): 84-92.
[16]
Hintze RE,Abou-Rebyeh H,Adler A, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography-guided unilateral endoscopic stent placement for Klatskin tumors. Gastrointest Endosc, 2001, 53(1): 40-46.
[17]
Kitagawa Y,Nagino M,Kamiya J, et al. Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann Surg, 2001, 233(3): 385-392.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[6] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[7] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[8] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[9] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[10] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[11] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[12] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[13] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要