切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (05) : 314 -317. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2013.05.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分对肝移植术后患者死亡分辨能力研究
胡月云1, 刘波2, 颜君3, 李铁花4, 马盈盈5, 胡爱玲1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院岭南医院护理部
    2. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院普外科
    3. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院中山大学护理学院
    4. 中山大学附属第三医院内科重症监护病房
    5. 中山大学附属第三医院肝移植中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-14 出版日期:2013-10-10
  • 通信作者: 胡爱玲

Discriminability of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅳ and model for end-stage liver disease scores on mortality after liver transplantation

Yue-yun HU1, Bo LIU2, Jun YAN3, Tie-hua LI4, Ying-ying MA5, Ai-ling HU1,()   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2013-07-14 Published:2013-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Ai-ling HU
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: HU Ai-ling, Email:
引用本文:

胡月云, 刘波, 颜君, 李铁花, 马盈盈, 胡爱玲. APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分对肝移植术后患者死亡分辨能力研究[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2013, 02(05): 314-317.

Yue-yun HU, Bo LIU, Jun YAN, Tie-hua LI, Ying-ying MA, Ai-ling HU. Discriminability of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅳ and model for end-stage liver disease scores on mortality after liver transplantation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(05): 314-317.

目的

探讨急性生理学和慢性健康状况(APACHE)Ⅳ评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对肝移植术后患者住院期间死亡的分辨能力。

方法

回顾性研究2006年2月至2009年7月在中山大学附属第三医院肝移植中心接受同种异体原位肝移植的195例患者临床资料。其中男171例,女24例;年龄(48±11)岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。收集患者APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分所需要的参数及住院期间死亡情况,分别计算患者APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分。绘制两种评分对患者死亡分辨力的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,根据ROC曲线下面积(A)判断两种评分对患者住院期间死亡的分辨力,A值<0.5时无分辨力,0.5~0.7时分辨力较低,0.7~0.9时分辨力中等,>0.9时分辨力较高。两种评分的ROC曲线A值比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。

结果

本研究195例患者中住院期间病死率为13.8%(27/195);患者APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分分别为(41±22)、(18±11)分,其中存活患者的APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分分别为(36±16)、(17±10)分,死亡患者的APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分分别为(75±25)、(26±13)分。APACHE Ⅳ评分对患者住院期间死亡分辨能力的ROC曲线A值为0.937,分辨力较高;MELD评分的ROC曲线A值为0.694,分辨力较低;APACHE Ⅳ评分的分辨力明显高于MELD评分(Z=3,493,P<0.05)。应用APACHE Ⅳ评分预测切点为56分,灵敏度0.85,特异度0.91,Youden指数0.76;MELD评分预测切点为20分,灵敏度0.70,特异度0.72,Youden指数0.43。

结论

与MELD评分比较,APACHE Ⅳ评分对肝移植术后患者住院期间死亡分辨能力更高,且分辨力的灵敏度和特异度更高。

Objective

To explore the discriminability of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) Ⅳ and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores on hospital mortality after liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

Clinical data of 195 patients [171 males, 24 females, mean age of (48±11) years old] who underwent orthotopic LT from February 2006 to July 2009 in Liver Transplantation Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sun University were studied retrospectively. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the ethical committee approval was received. The required parameters for APACHE IV and MELD scores and hospital mortality were collected, and the APACHE IV and MELD scores were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of discriminating patients′ mortality by two scores were drawn. The discriminability of two scores on hospital mortality were judged from the area under ROC curves (A). The discriminability was invalid when A value was <0.5, and was low when 0.5-0.7, moderate when 0.7-0.9, high when >0.9. The difference of A value between two scores were compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

The hospital mortality of 195 patients in this study was 13.8% (27/195). The mean APACHE Ⅳ and MELD scores were (42±22), (18±11) respectively for all the patients. The mean APACHE Ⅳ and MELD scores were (36±16), (17±10) respectively for the survivals, while were (75±25), (26±13) respectively for the deaths. The A value of APACHE Ⅳ score in discriminating hospital mortality was 0.937 with a high discrimination. The A value of MELD score in discriminating hospital mortality was 0.694 with a low discrimination. The discriminability of APACHE Ⅳ score was higher than that of MELD score (Z=3,493, P<0.05). The predictive cutoff point of APACHE Ⅳ score was 56 with the sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.91 and Youden index 0.76. The predictive cutoff point of MELD score was 20 with the sensitivity 0.70, specificity 0.72 and Youden index 0.43.

Conclusions

Compared with MELD score, the discriminability of APACHE Ⅳ score on hospital mortality after liver transplantation is higher, and the sensitivity and specificity are also higher.

图1 APACHE Ⅳ评分和MELD评分分辨肝移植术后患者死亡的ROC曲线
[1]
Ahmed A,Keeffe EB. Current indications and contraindications for liver transplantation. Clin Liver Dis, 2007, 11(2): 227-247.
[2]
沈中阳,陈新国.临床肝移植. 2版.北京:科学出版社, 2010: 2-4.
[3]
Arabi Y,Abbasi A,Goraj R, et al. External validation of a modified model of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ for orthotopic liver transplant patients. Crit Care, 2002, 6(3): 245-250.
[4]
Volk ML,Hernandez JC,Lok AS, et al. Modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl, 2007, 13(11): 1515-1520.
[5]
Knaus WA,Zimmerman JE,Wagner DP, et al. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med, 1981, 9(8): 591-597.
[6]
Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP, et al. APACHE Ⅱ: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med, 1985, 13(10):818-829.
[7]
Knaus WA,Wagner DP,Draper EA, et al. The APACHE Ⅲ prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest, 1991, 100(6): 1619-1636.
[8]
Zimmerman JE,Kramer AA,McNair DS, et al. Intensive care unit length of stay: Benchmarking based on Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅳ. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34(10): 2517-2529.
[9]
Gallegos-Orozco JF,Vargas HE. Liver transplantation: from Child to MELD. Med Clin North Am, 2009, 93(4): 931-950.
[10]
Suzuki H,Bartlett AS,Muiesan P, et al. High model for end-stage liver disease score as a predictor of survival during long-term follow-up after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc, 2012, 44(2): 384-388.
[11]
Batista TP,Sabat BD,Melo PS, et al. Employment of MELD score for the prediction of survival after liver transplantation. Rev Col Bras Cir, 2012, 39(2): 105-111.
[12]
赵耐清.临床医学研究设计和数据分析.上海:复旦大学出版社, 2005: 241-252.
[13]
Zimmerman JE,Kramer AA,McNair DS, et al. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅳ: hospital mortality assessment for today′s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34(5): 1297-1310.
[14]
Knaus WA. APACHE 1978-2001: the development of a quality assurance system based on prognosis: milestones and personal reflections. Arch Surg, 2002, 137(1): 37-41.
[15]
Pascual E,Gomez-Arnau J,Pensado A, et al. Incidence and risk factors of early acute renal failure in liver transplant patients. Transplant Proc, 1993, 25(2): 1837.
[16]
Dellon ES,Galanko JA,Medapalli RK, et al. Impact of dialysis and older age on survival after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2006, 6(9): 2183-2190.
[17]
Basile-Filho A,Nicolini EA,Auxiliadora-Martins M, et al. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ death risk, Child-Pugh, Charlson, and model for end-stage liver disease indexes to predict early mortality after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc, 2011, 43(5): 1660-1664.
[18]
Yoo HY,Thuluvath PJ. Short-term postliver transplant survival after the introduction of MELD scores for organ allocation in the United States. Liver Int, 2005, 25(3): 536-541.
[1] 陈进宏. 腹腔镜活体供肝获取规范与创新[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 324-324.
[2] 仲福顺, 余露, 范晓礼, 叶啟发. 肝移植治疗肝上皮样血管内皮瘤一例[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 293-297.
[3] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[4] 贺健, 张骊, 王洪海, 蒋文涛. 肝移植术后脾功能亢进转归及治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 310-314.
[5] 胡宁宁, 赵延荣, 王栋, 王胜亮, 郭源. FMNL3与肝细胞癌肝移植受者预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 283-288.
[6] 黄建朋, 邹建强, 宗华. 肝移植术后腹壁疝诊治初步经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 471-473.
[7] 邵世锋, 肖钦, 沈方龙, 张迅, 郝志鹏, 伍正彬, 谢晓娟, 王耀丽. 老年胸主动脉钝性伤的重症救治分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 762-767.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会. 肝移植术后缺血性胆道病变诊断与治疗中国实践指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 739-748.
[9] 魏志鸿, 刘建勇, 吴小雅, 杨芳, 吕立志, 江艺, 蔡秋程. 肝移植术后急性移植物抗宿主病的诊治(附四例报告)[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 846-851.
[10] 傅斌生, 冯啸, 杨卿, 曾凯宁, 姚嘉, 唐晖, 刘剑戎, 魏绪霞, 易慧敏, 易述红, 陈规划, 杨扬. 脂肪变性供肝在成人劈离式肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 789-794.
[11] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[12] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[13] 刘春峰, 徐朝晖, 施红伟, 陈瑢, 马腾飞, 李鹏飞, 袁蓉, 陈建荣, 徐爱明. 机械通气患者肌肉减少症的诊断及其对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 820-825.
[14] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[15] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?