切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (05) : 322 -326. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2013.05.012

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

家兔脑死亡后肝损伤机制
钟自彪1, 叶啟发1,(), 范晓礼1, 李玲1, 王彦峰1   
  1. 1. 430071 武汉大学中南医院武汉大学肝胆疾病研究院 武汉大学移植医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-05-14 出版日期:2013-10-10
  • 通信作者: 叶啟发
  • 基金资助:
    武汉市科技攻关项目(201161038344-01); 湖北省自然科学基金(2012FFA044); 武汉市科技局公共服务平台建设计划项目(2013060705010326)

Mechanism of liver injury of rabbits after brain death

Zi-biao ZHONG1, Qi-fa YE1,(), Xiao-li FAN1, Ling LI1, Yan-feng WANG1   

  1. 1. Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases of Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Transplant Medical Center of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2013-05-14 Published:2013-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Qi-fa YE
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: YE Qi-fa, Email:
引用本文:

钟自彪, 叶啟发, 范晓礼, 李玲, 王彦峰. 家兔脑死亡后肝损伤机制[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2013, 02(05): 322-326.

Zi-biao ZHONG, Qi-fa YE, Xiao-li FAN, Ling LI, Yan-feng WANG. Mechanism of liver injury of rabbits after brain death[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2013, 02(05): 322-326.

目的

探讨家兔脑死亡后肝损伤机制。

方法

健康雄性新西兰家兔60只,按随机数字表法随机分为脑死亡组和假手术组,每组30只。脑死亡组采用颅骨钻孔置管,缓慢间断颅内加压至脑死亡;假手术组颅骨钻孔置管,不加压。两组分别于术后2、6、8 h各处死10只,留取血标本及肝组织标本,采用比色法检测血清肝功能指标,苏木素-伊红(HE)染色观察肝脏的形态学改变,酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血清中白介素(IL)-1β、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α的水平。两组间数据比较采用t检验,组内各时间点比较采用方差分析及LSD-t检验。

结果

脑死亡组家兔术后8 h的血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)为(83±7)U/L,较术后6 h的(52±4)U/L明显升高(LSD-t=29.65,P<0.05)。随着时间延长,脑死亡组家兔肝脏水肿及汇管区炎症细胞浸润逐渐加重,术后8 h时出现中性粒细胞微脓肿,肝细胞受损不明显;而假手术组以中性粒细胞浸润为主。脑死亡组术后8 h血清IL-1β为(46±5)mg/L,较假手术组的(33±4)mg/L明显升高,差异有统计学意义(t=3.334,P<0.05)。脑死亡组术后2、6、8 h不同时间点血清TNF-α为(35.3±4.0)mg/L、(43.4±6.9)mg/L、(49.3±5.4)mg/L,均较对应假手术组的(25.4±3.1)mg/L、(24.2±7.1)mg/L、(25.4±2.0)mg/L明显升高,差异有统计学意义(t=3.409,3.369,7.224;P<0.05)。

结论

脑死亡组家兔在术后8 h内肝功能及形态学无明显变化,术后8 h开始出现中性粒细胞微脓肿及汇管区淋巴细胞浸润,可能与免疫损伤有关。对于家兔脑死亡供体,宜8 h内行肝移植手术治疗。

Objective

To explore the mechanism of liver injury of rabbits after brain death.

Methods

Sixty healthy male New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into brain death group (n=30) and sham group (n=30) according to the random number table. Rabbits in brain death group were put to brain death by cranial drilling, cathetering and increasing intracranial pressure in a slow, intermittent way. While rabbits in sham group underwent cranial drilling and cathetering without pressuring. Ten rabbits from each group were respectively put to death at the time points of 2, 6, 8 h after operation, and the samples of blood and liver tissues were collected. Serum indexes of liver function were detected by colorimetry. Morphology change of liver was observed by haematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The difference between two groups was compared using t test and the difference of each time points within the group was compared using variance analysis and LSD-t test.

Results

The level of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at 8 h after operation in brain death group was significant higher than that at 6 h after operation [(83±7)U/L vs. (52±4)U/L; LSD-t=29.65, P<0.05]. Liver edema and inflammatory cell infiltration in the portal area aggravated gradually in brain death group as time passed, neutrophil microabscess was observed at 8 h after operation and liver cell damage was found unobvious. While rabbits in sham group were found mainly with neutrophil infiltration. The level of serum IL-1β at 8 h after operation increased evidently in brain death group than that in sham group, and significant difference was observed [(46±5)mg/L vs. (33±4)mg/L; t=3.334, P<0.05]. The level of serum TNF-α at the time points of 2, 6, 8 h after operation increased evidently in brain death group than that in sham group, and significant difference was observed [(35.3±4.0)mg/L vs. (25.4±3.1)mg/L, (43.4±6.9) mg/L vs. (24.2±7.1)mg/L, (49.3±5.4)mg/L vs. (25.4±2.0)mg/L; t=3.409, 3.369, 7.224, P<0.05].

Conclusions

No obvious changes were observed in the liver function and morphology in brain death rabbits within 8 h after operation. Neutrophil microabscess and lymphocyte infiltration in the portal area were observed at 8 h after operation, which might be relevant with immunologic injury. It is ideal for donors of brain death rabbits to undergo liver transplantation within 8 h.

图1 脑死亡模型建立过程中家兔血压的变化
表1 脑死亡组和假手术组家兔肝功能的比较(±s
图2 脑死亡组和假手术组家兔肝组织光镜下切片染色结果(HE ×200)
表2 脑死亡组和假手术组家兔血清IL-1β、TNF-α水平的比较(mg/L,±s
[1]
严律南.加强保证活体供肝者安全的临床研究.中华器官移植杂志, 2010, 31(1): 9-10.
[2]
Alexander JW,Zola JC. Expanding the donor pool: use of marginal donors for solid organ transplantation. Clin Transplant, 1996, 10(1 Pt 1): 1-19.
[3]
Lee VT,Yip CC,Ganpathi IS, et al. Expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation in the setting of an "opt-out" scheme: 3 years after new legislation. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2009, 38(4): 315-317.
[4]
Pratschke J,Wilhelm MJ,Kusaka M, et al. Brain death and its influence on donor organ quality and outcome after transplantation. Transplantation, 1999, 67(3): 343-348.
[5]
Terasaki PI,Cecka JM,Gjertson DW, et al. High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors. N Engl J Med, 1995, 333(6): 333-336.
[6]
Morariu AM,Schuurs TA,Leuvenink HG, et al. Early events in kidney donation: progression of endothelial activation, oxidative stress and tubular injury after brain death. Am J Transplant, 2008, 8(5): 933-941.
[7]
凌峰.脑死亡判定标准(成人)(修订稿).中国脑血管病杂志,2009, 6(4): 220-204.
[8]
李震,郭文治,翟文龙,等.脑死亡状态下巴马小型猪肝脏功能和形态的变化.郑州大学学报:医学版, 2006, 41(1): 91-94.
[9]
朱长举,李建华,张弓,等.脑死亡时猪肝脏功能及组织学改变的研究.中华普通外科杂志, 2010, 25(6): 487-489.
[10]
王甲甲,李玲,钟自彪,等.兔脑死亡状态对肾脏损伤的影响机制.中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(53): 10021-10026.
[11]
Hancock WW. Current trends in transplant immunology. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 1999, 8(3): 317-324.
[12]
Koudstaal LG,′t Hart NA,Ottens PJ, et al. Brain death induces inflammation in the donor intestine. Transplantation, 2008, 86(1): 148-154.
[13]
Takada M,Nadeau KC,Hancock WW, et al. Effects of explosive brain death on cytokine activation of peripheral organs in the rat. Transplantation, 1998, 65(12): 1533-1542.
[14]
Lagranha CJ,Deschamps A,Aponte A, et al. Sex differences in the phosphorylation of mitochondrial proteins result in reduced production of reactive oxygen species and cardioprotection in females. Circ Res, 2010, 106(11): 1681-1691.
[15]
Endo J,Sano M,Katayama T, et al. Metabolic remodeling induced by mitochondrial aldehyde stress stimulates tolerance to oxidative stress in the heart. Circ Res, 2009, 105(11): 1118-1127.
[16]
Mandrekar P,Szabo G. Signalling pathways in alcohol-induced liver inflammation. J Hepatol, 2009, 50(6): 1258-1266.
[17]
Qi D,Hu X,Wu X, et al. Cardiac macrophage migration inhibitory factor inhibits JNK pathway activation and injury during ischemia/reperfusion. J Clin Invest, 2009, 119(12): 3807-3816.
[18]
Kotsch K,Ulrich F,Reutzel-Selke A, et al. Methylprednisolone therapy in deceased donors reduces inflammation in the donor liver and improves outcome after liver transplantation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 2008, 248(6): 1042-1050.
[19]
Hoffmann MW,Wonigeit K,Steinhoff G, et al. Production of cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-1-beta) and endothelial cell activation in human liverallograft rejection. Transplantation, 1993, 55(2): 329-335.
[1] . 肝移植治疗终末期肝病[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 1-.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 江文诗, 何湘湘. 全球及我国器官捐献发展特征分析与学科建设[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 280-286.
[5] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[6] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[7] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[8] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[9] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[12] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[13] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[14] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[15] 李世凯, 梁佳, 何艳艳, 于毅, 李天晓, 常金龙, 贺迎坤. 兔颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄模型在介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 357-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要