切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03): 181 -186. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2015.03.012

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

人源电压门控质子通道蛋白在肝细胞癌中的表达及其在生存预后中的意义
江鹏1, 唐云强1,(), 谭志明1, 石波云1, 陈海龙1, 何璐2, 唐辉1, 洪健1   
  1. 1. 510095 广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院肝胆肿瘤外科
    2. 510095 广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-22 出版日期:2015-06-10
  • 通信作者: 唐云强
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81472265,81206134); 广州医科大学医院重大专项资助项目(2011-yz-03)

Expression of human voltage-gated proton channel 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma and its significance in survival and prognosis

Peng Jiang1, Yunqiang Tang1,(), Zhiming Tan1, Boyun Shi1, Hailong Chen1, Lu He2, Hui Tang1, Jian Hong1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
    2. Department of Radiotheraphy, Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510095, China
  • Received:2015-01-22 Published:2015-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Yunqiang Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Yunqiang, Email:
目的

探讨人源电压门控质子通道蛋白(HVCN1)在肝细胞癌(肝癌)组织中的表达及其对肝癌根治性切除术后患者生存预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2008年8月至2009年12月在广州医科大学附属肿瘤医院行肝癌根治性切除术的92例患者临床资料,并选取其肝癌及癌旁组织进行研究。其中男82例,女10例;平均年龄(51±12)岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。采用免疫组化法检测肝癌及癌旁组织HVCN1表达。观察肝癌组织中HVCN1的表达,分析HVCN1阳性表达与患者临床病理学参数的关系,并对患者的生存预后及其影响因素进行分析。HVCN1的表达及其与临床病理学参数的关系采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。生存预后影响因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型。

结果

肝癌组织HVCN1阳性表达率为29%(27/92),明显高于癌旁组织的12%(5/40) (χ2=2.076, P<0.05)。肝癌组织中HVCN1高表达与肿瘤包膜(P<0.05)、血管侵犯(χ2=4.937, P<0.05)、术后早期复发有关(χ2=8.081,P<0.05)。HVCN1阳性表达患者的1、3、5年累积生存率分别为81.5%、41.0%、29.3%,HVCN1阴性表达患者为92.1%、61.0%、61.0%,HVCN1阳性表达患者的总体生存率明显低于HVCN1阴性表达患者(χ2= 8.226,P<0.05)。HVCN1阳性表达患者的1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为51.9%、13.5%、13.5%,HVCN1阴性表达患者为70.6%、34.0%、34.0%,HVCN1阳性表达患者的无瘤生存率明显低于HVCN1阴性表达患者(χ2 =5.302,P<0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,HVCN1阳性表达、肝硬化是影响肝癌根治性肝切除术后患者生存预后的独立危险因素(RR=2.520, 2.408;P<0.05)。

结论

HVCN1在肝癌组织中高表达,与肿瘤包膜、血管浸润、术后早期复发相关,是影响肝癌根治性切除术后患者生存预后的独立危险因素,可作为肝癌患者根治性切除术后的预测指标。

Objective

To investigate the expression of human voltage-gated proton channel 1 (HVCN1) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its significance in survival and prognosis after radical hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 92 patients with HCC undergoing radical hepatectomy in the Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University between August 2008 and December 2009 were retrospectively studied. The HCC ard para-carcinoma tissues were chosen and studied. Among the 92 patients, 82 were males and 10 were females with the average age of (51±12) years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. HVCN1 expression in HCC and para-carcinoma tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry. HVCN1 expression in HCC tissues was observed and the correlation between the positive expression of HVCN1 and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. In addition, the survival and prognosis of HCC patients as well as the influencing factors were also analyzed. The analysis on the correlation between the expression of HVCN1 and clinicopathological parameters was conducted using Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact Test. The survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. The analysis on influencing factors of survival and prognosis was conducted using Cox Proportional Hazard Regression Model.

Results

The positive expression of HVCN1 in HCC tissues was 29% (27/92), which was significantly higher than 12% (5/40) of that in para-carcinoma tissues (χ2=2.076, P<0.05). High HVCN1 expression in HCC tissues was correlated with tumor capsule (P<0.05), vascular invasion (χ2=4.937, P<0.05) and early postoperative recurrence (χ2=8.081, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, 5-year accumulated survival rate was respectively 81.5%, 41.0%, 29.3% for patients with positive HVCN1 expression, and 92.1%, 61.0%, 61.0% for patients with negative HVCN1 expression. The overall survival rate of patients with positive HVCN1 expression was significantly lower than that of patients with negative HVCN1 expression (χ2=8.226, P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, 5-year disease-free survival rate was respectively 51.9%, 13.5%, 13.5% for patients with positive HVCN1 expression and 70.6%, 34.0% and 34.0% for patients with negative HVCN1 expression. The disease-free survival rate of patients with positive HVCN1 expression was significantly lower than that of patients with negative HVCN1 expression (χ2= 5.302, P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that positive HVCN1 expression and liver cirrhosis were the independent risk factors affecting the survival and prognosis of patients with HCC after radical hepatectomy (RR=2.520,2.408; P<0.05).

Conclusions

High HVCN1 expression in HCC tissues was correlated with tumor capsule, vascular invasion and early postoperative recurrence, and is the independent risk factor affecting the survival and prognosis of patients with HCC after radical hepatectomy, which can be used as the predictive index for patients with HCC after radical hepatectomy.

图1 肝癌及癌旁组织中HVCN1的表达(免疫组化法 ×200)
表1 肝癌组织HVCN1的表达与患者临床病理学参数的关系
图2 人源电压门控质子通道蛋白(HVCN1)阳性与阴性表达患者的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
图3 人源电压门控质子通道蛋白(HVCN1)阳性与阴性表达患者的Kaplan-Meier无瘤生存曲线
表3 影响肝癌根治性肝切除术后患者预后的多因素Cox回归分析结果
[1]
吴孟超.肝癌在中国[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2012,1(1): 3-4.
[2]
中华人民共和国卫生部.原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2011年版)[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2011, 16(10):929-946.
[3]
Hong J, Hu K, Yuan Y, et al. CHK1 targets spleen tyrosine kinase (L) for proteolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Clin Invest, 2012, 122(6): 2165-2175.
[4]
Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822):1245-1255.
[5]
El Chemaly A, Nunes P, Jimaja W, et al. Hv1 proton channels differentially regulate the pH of neutrophil and macrophage phagosomes by sustaining the production of phagosomal ROS that inhibit the delivery of vacuolar ATPases[J]. J Leukoc Biol, 2014, 95(5):827-839.
[6]
Chamberlin A, Qiu F, Rebolledo S, et al. Hydrophobic plug functions as a gate in voltage-gated proton channels[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(2): E273-282.
[7]
Wang Y, Li SJ, Wu X, et al. Clinicopathological and biological significance of human voltage-gated proton channel Hv1 protein overexpression in breast cancer[J]. J Biol Chem, 2012, 287(17): 13877-13888.
[8]
Wang Y, Wu X, Li Q, et al. Human voltage-gated proton channel hv1: a new potential biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(8): e70550.
[9]
He L,Zhou X,Qu C,et al. Musashi2 predicts poor prognosis and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by driving epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J]. J Cell Mol Med, 2014, 18(1): 49-58.
[10]
何璐,周新科,洪健.肝细胞癌中Musashi2的表达及意义[J].广东医学,2013, 34(20): 3152-3154.
[11]
Song J, Ge Z, Yang X, et al. Hepatic stellate cells activated by acidic tumor microenvironment promote the metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via osteopontin[J]. Cancer lett, 2015, 356(2 Pt B):713-720.
[12]
Estrella V, Chen T, Lloyd M, et al. Acidity generated by the tumor microenvironment drives local invasion[J]. Cancer Res, 2013, 73(5):1524-1535.
[13]
Hong L, Kim IH, Tombola F. Molecular determinants of Hv1 proton channel inhibition by guanidine derivatives[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 2014, 111(27): 9971-9976.
[14]
Dietl K,Renner K,Dettmer K,et al. Lactic acid and acidification inhibit TNF secretion and glycolysis of human monocytes[J]. J Immunol, 2010, 184(3): 1200-1209.
[15]
Capasso M. Regulation of immune responses by proton channels[J]. Immunology, 2014, 143(2): 131-137.
[16]
Seredenina T, Demaurex N, Krause KH. Voltage-gated proton channels as novel drug targets: from NADPH oxidase regulation to sperm biology[J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2014, DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5806[Epub ahead of print].
[1] 欧雷, 罗之谦, 陈旺文, 龙凯军. 胃癌患者No.14v淋巴结转移或微转移与临床病理特征及预后关系研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 279-282.
[2] 郭宁, 邓天伟, 胡述静. 基于腹腔镜技术的不同吻合方式用于远端胃癌根治术的近中期随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 283-286.
[3] 孙号, 谢贻祥, 王永森. 结直肠癌No.253淋巴结转移的危险因素及对预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 315-318.
[4] 刘贤, 兰春斌, 胥彬, 徐竹林, 宋正宇. 肝切除术围手术期症状性静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估模型的建立及验证[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 319-322.
[5] 张安清, 东爱华, 李红霞, 李爱华. 三种肝血流阻断技术在腹腔镜下肝切除术中的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 323-326.
[6] 阙清扬, 余炯杰, 凌孙彬, 徐骁. 免疫治疗在肝癌肝移植降期治疗中的应用及前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 221-224.
[7] 陈泰安, 熊永福, 徐建, 李强, 杨刚, 李敬东. 复杂肝癌腹腔镜肝切除的应用及挑战[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 239-243.
[8] 周陈杰, 王杰钦, 张健民, 冯磊, 傅超毅, 廖晖, 徐小平, 高毅. 浅谈腹腔镜解剖性肝切除手术入路和解剖标志[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 244-247.
[9] 苟晓雪, 王明达, 薛军, 史鸿云, 张新, 杨田. 立体定向放射治疗在肝细胞癌合并门静脉癌栓中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 248-251.
[10] 谢静, 毛先海, 杨建辉, 段小辉, 田朕安, 张雄, 高绪照. 再次肝切除与腹腔镜微波消融治疗复发性小肝癌临床疗效比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 258-262.
[11] 卢文峰, 付雍, 阎凯, 袁建勇, 陈佩钦, 张海斌. 术后预防性TACE对肝内胆管细胞癌患者预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 268-272.
[12] 陈一帆, 王晨晨, 卢杏生. 肝内胆管导管内乳头状瘤恶变伴门静脉及胆道变异一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 299-303.
[13] 江哲龙, 魏志鸿, 杜俊杰, 江艺, 吕立志, 杨芳. FOXC2对肝癌肝移植患者预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 309-314.
[14] 熊培尧, 唐雨豪, 杨子良, 朱应钦, 王骏成, 徐立. 小鼠VETC(+)肝癌模型构建及索拉非尼对VETC结构的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 315-319.
[15] 林影, 李建红, 卢宏全, 陈俊玲. 急性脑梗死患者血清正五聚蛋白3水平与其血脂、认知功能及预后的关系研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 420-424.
阅读次数
全文


摘要