切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 215 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2015.04.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

血清CEA、CA19-9联合检测在肝内胆管结石合并肝内胆管细胞癌诊断中的价值
聂凯1, 薛小军1, 张文华1, 周松1,()   
  1. 1. 363000 福建漳州,解放军第一七五医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-12 出版日期:2015-08-10
  • 通信作者: 周松

Value of combined detection of serum CEA and CA19-9 in diagnosis of hepatolithiasis complicated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Kai Nie1, Xiaojun Xue1, Wenhua Zhang1, Song Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the 175th Hospital of PLA, Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2015-05-12 Published:2015-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Song Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Song, Email:
引用本文:

聂凯, 薛小军, 张文华, 周松. 血清CEA、CA19-9联合检测在肝内胆管结石合并肝内胆管细胞癌诊断中的价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2015, 04(04): 215-217.

Kai Nie, Xiaojun Xue, Wenhua Zhang, Song Zhou. Value of combined detection of serum CEA and CA19-9 in diagnosis of hepatolithiasis complicated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 04(04): 215-217.

目的

探讨CEA、CA19-9联合检测在肝内胆管结石合并肝内胆管细胞癌诊断中的价值。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2005年1月至2012年1月在解放军第一七五医院收治的41例肝内胆管结石患者。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据术后病理学检查结果将患者分为肝内胆管结石合并肝内胆管细胞癌组(胆管癌组,21例)、肝内胆管结石组(结石组,20例),另选择20名健康体检者作为对照组。其中胆管癌组男13例,女8例;平均年龄(50±10)岁。结石组男10例,女10例;年龄(53±10)岁。对照组男10例,女10例;年龄(52±9)岁。比较3组血清CEA、CA19-9水平,并观察CEA、CA19-9联合检测在肝内胆管结石合并肝内胆管细胞癌诊断中的价值。3组检测数据比较采用单因素方差分析和LSD-t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

胆管癌组血清CEA、CA19-9分别为(17±7)μg/L、(528±228)kU/L,明显高于结石组的(3±1)μg/L、(168±97)kU/L (LSD-t=9.126,6.498;P<0.05)。胆管癌组CEA、CA19-9两项联合检测的阳性率为86%,明显高于单项CEA、CA19-9检测的52%、76%(χ2=5.46,4.20;P<0.05)。

结论

CEA、CA19-9联合检测可提高肝内胆管结石合并胆管癌的术前检出率,可能有助于与肝内胆管结石的鉴别诊断。

Objective

To investigate the value of combined detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 in diagnosis of hepatolithiasis complicated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

A total of 41 patients with hepatolithiasis admitted and treated in the 175th Hospital of PLA between January 2005 and January 2012 were enrolled in this prospective study. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval had been received. According to the results of pathological examination, the patients were divided into the hepatolithiasis complicated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group (cholangiocarcinoma group, n=21) and the hepatolithiasis group (calculus group, n=20). Moreover, 20 healthy people were enrolled in the control group. In the cholangiocarcinoma group, 13 were males and 8 were females with the average age of (50±10) years old. In the hepatolithiasis group, 10 were males and 10 were females with the average age of (53±10) years old. In the control group, 10 were males and 10 were females with the average age of (52±9) years old. Serum CEA and CA19-9 level of the three groups were compared, and the value of combined detection of serum CEA and CA19-9 in diagnosis of hepatolithiasis complicated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was observed. The comparison on the detection data of three groups was conducted using one-way analysis of variance and LSD-t test. The comparison on positive rate was conducted using Chi-square test.

Results

Serum CEA and CA19-9 of the cholangiocarcinoma group were respectively (17±7) μg/L and (528±228) kU/L, which were significantly higher than (3±1) μg/L and (168±97) kU/L of the hepatolithiasis group (LSD-t=9.126, 6.498; P<0.05). The positive rate of combined detection of serum CEA and CA19-9 in the cholangiocarcinoma group was 86%, which was significantly higher than 52% and 76% of single detection of CEA and CA19-9 (χ2=5.46, 4.20; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Combined detection of serum CEA and CA19-9 may increase the preoperative detection rate of hepatolithiasis complicated with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and may be beneficial to the differential diagnosis of hepatolithiasis.

表1 三组血清CEA、CA19-9表达水平(±s
表2 两组血清CEA、CA19-9阳性率(%)
[1]
Singh S, Tang SJ, Sreenarasimhaiah J, et al. The clinical utility and limitations of serum carbohydrate antigen (CA19-9) as a diagnostic tool for pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2011, 56(8): 2491-2496.
[2]
易琳,刘兴明,林丁,等.血清CA153、CA125、CEA联合检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值[J].重庆医科大学学报,2012, 37(9): 802-805.
[3]
杨天文,何平.胆结石患者血清CA19-9、CEA表达与胆管炎症的关系[J].重庆医学,2013, 42(6): 633-634.
[4]
聂荣慧,刘元元.肿瘤标志物AFP、CA125、CA199和CEA检测在肝炎、肝硬化患者诊断和治疗中的应用[J].吉林大学学报:医学版,2012, 38(1): 119-122.
[5]
房龙,樊艳华,杜时雨,等.内镜逆行胰胆管造影相关技术结合血清CEA、CA199对胆管梗阻定性诊断的研究[J].首都医科大学学报,2014, 35(5):626-629.
[6]
王继恒,高革,闫伟,等.血清CA19-9水平在良性胆管疾病患者中的临床意义[J].胃肠病学,2010, 15(3): 166-168.
[7]
蒋建强,李晓勇,陈艳军,等.肝内胆管结石合并肝胆管癌临床分析[J].中国全科医学,2013, 16(11): 1289-1291.
[8]
Li HY, Zhou SJ, Li M, et al. Diagnosis and cure experience of hepatolithiasis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in 66 patients[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2012, 13(2): 725-729.
[9]
沈先锋,梅小溪,胡军,等.肝内胆管结石合并肝胆管癌30例诊治分析[J].肝胆外科杂志,2013, 21(1): 31-33.
[10]
Zhang GW, Lin JH, Qian JP, et al. Identification of prognostic factors and the impact of palliative resection on survival of patients with stage IV hepatolithiasis-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2014, 109(5): 494-499.
[11]
徐云峰,王凯,刘亚奇,等.原发性肝内胆管结石合并胆管癌[J].中华普通外科杂志,2012, 27(2): 145-147.
[12]
Wannhoff A, Hov JR, Folseraas T, et al. FUT2 and FUT3 genotype determines CA19-9 cut-off values for detection of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis[J]. J Hepatol, 2013, 59(6): 1278-1284.
[13]
La Greca G, Sofia M, Lombardo R, et al. Adjusting CA19-9 values to predict malignancy in obstructive jaundice: influence of bilirubin and C-reactive protein[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(31):4150-4155.
[14]
Yeo D, Perini MV, Muralidharan V, et al. Focal intrahepatic strictures: a review of diagnosis and management[J]. HPB, 2012, 14(7):425-434.
[15]
Jo JH, Chung MJ, Park JY, et al. High serum CA19-9 levels are associated with an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with intrahepatic duct stones: a case-control study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(11): 4210-4216.
[16]
李汛,严俊,孟文勃,等.血清CA19-9在胆道系统良恶性疾病鉴别诊断中的临床价值[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2014, 3(4): 252-253.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[3] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[4] 李智铭, 郭晨明, 庄晓晨, 候雪琴, 高军喜. 早期乳腺癌超声造影定性及定量指标的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[5] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[6] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[7] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[8] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[9] 许丁伟, 马江云, 李新成, 黄洁. Alagille综合征疑诊为先天性胆道闭锁一例并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 681-687.
[10] 顾睿祈, 方洪生, 蔡国响. 循环肿瘤DNA检测在结直肠癌诊治中的应用与进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 453-459.
[11] 赵立力, 王魁向, 张小冲, 李志远. 血沉与C-反应蛋白比值在假体周围感染中的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 351-355.
[12] 吴凤芸, 滕鑫, 刘连娟. 高帧频超声造影与增强磁共振对不同直径原发性高分化肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 404-408.
[13] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[14] 李田, 徐洪, 刘和亮. 尘肺病的相关研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 900-905.
[15] 周婷, 孙培培, 张二明, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断现状调查[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 790-797.
阅读次数
全文


摘要