切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 168 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.03.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

CT值对原发性肝癌肝周淋巴结转移的诊断价值
王晓耘1, 黑振宇1, 靳龙洋1, 韩超1, 沈军1, 王健东1,()   
  1. 1. 200092 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-28 出版日期:2016-06-10
  • 通信作者: 王健东
  • 基金资助:
    国家十二五科技重大专项(2012ZX10002016)

Diagnostic value of CT value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of primary liver cancer

Xiaoyun Wang1, Zhenyu Hei1, Longyang Jin1, Chao Han1, Jun Shen1, Jiandong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2016-01-28 Published:2016-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jiandong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jiandong, Email:
引用本文:

王晓耘, 黑振宇, 靳龙洋, 韩超, 沈军, 王健东. CT值对原发性肝癌肝周淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 168-172.

Xiaoyun Wang, Zhenyu Hei, Longyang Jin, Chao Han, Jun Shen, Jiandong Wang. Diagnostic value of CT value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of primary liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 168-172.

目的

探讨CT值在原发性肝癌(肝癌)肝周淋巴结转移中的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2001年10月至2015年1月在上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院行肝癌切除+淋巴结清扫术的14例患者临床资料。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男8例,女6例;年龄36~73岁,中位年龄51岁。14例患者经术前增强扫描检查发现15组淋巴结可疑阳性,根据术后病理学检查分为阳性组(8组)和阴性组(7组)。比较两组淋巴结平扫、动脉期CT值及动脉期CT值变异系数(CV)的差异等,并分析上述指标诊断淋巴结转移的准确率。两组观察指标比较采用t检验,诊断淋巴结转移的准确率分析采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

阳性组平扫CT值、动脉期CT值及其CV分别为(30±4)HU、(45±10)HU、(30±10)%,阴性组相应为(43±5)HU、(65±18)HU、(17±6)%,两组差异有统计学意义(t=-5.400,-2.660,2.990;P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示平扫CT值、动脉期CT值及其CV诊断分界值分别为38 HU、54 HU及22%,诊断准确率分别为100%、80%、80%。

结论

CT值定量分析对肝癌肝周淋巴结转移具有诊断价值。当肝周淋巴结平扫CT值<38 HU、动脉期CT值<54 HU、动脉期CT值CV>22%时,提示转移可能性大。

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of primary liver cancer (PLC).

Methods

Clinical data of 14 patients undergoing PLC resection + lymph node dissection in Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine between October 2001 and January 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among the patients, 8 were males and 6 were females with the age ranging from 36 to 73 years old and the median of 51 years old. Fifteen groups of suspicious positive lymph nodes of the 14 patients were detected by enhanced CT scan before operation, and were divided into the positive group (n=8) and the negative group (n=7) according to the postoperative pathological examination. The differences in plain CT value, arterial phase CT value and coefficient of variation (CV) of arterial phase CT value of the lymph nodes between two groups were compared. And the diagnostic accuracy of the lymph node metastasis by these indexes was analyzed. The observation indexes of two groups were compared using t test and the analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastasis was conducted using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

The plain CT value, arterial phase CT value and CV of arterial phase CT value were respectively (30±4) HU, (45±10) HU and (30±10)% in the positive group, and were respectively (43±5) HU, (65±18) HU and (17±6)% in the negative group, and significant differences were observed between two groups (t=-5.400, -2.660, 2.990; P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off value of plain CT value, arterial phase CT value and CV of arterial phase CT value was respectively 38 HU, 54 HU and 22%, and the diagnostic accuracy was respectively 100%, 80% and 80%.

Conclusions

CT value has certain diagnostic value for perihepatic lymph node metastasis of PLC. Perihepatic lymph node metastasis is likely to occur when plain CT value<38 HU, arterial phase CT value<54 HU and CV of arterial phase CT value>22%.

表1 肝癌患者淋巴结阳性组与阴性组各期CT值及其变异系数比较(
图1 肝癌患者淋巴结平扫CT值的ROC曲线
图2 肝癌患者淋巴结动脉期CT值的ROC曲线
图3 肝癌患者淋巴结动脉期CT值变异系数的ROC曲线
[1]
Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, et al. Impact of histologically confirmed lymph node metastases on patient survival after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a Japanese nationwide survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(1): 166-170.
[2]
Garden OJ. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery[M]. 4th ed. Saunders: Philadelphia, 2009: 230-230.
[3]
Awazu M, Fukumoto T, Takebe A, et al. Lymphadenectomy combined with locoregional treatment for multiple advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with lymph node metastases[J]. Kobe J Med Sci, 2013, 59(1): E17-27.
[4]
Hasegawa K, Makuuchi M, Kokudo N, et al. Impact of histologically confirmed lymph node metastases on patient survival after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a Japanese nationwide survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 259(1):166-170.
[5]
Lee CW, Chan KM, Lee CF, et al. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with lymph node metastasis: clinicopathological analysis and survival outcome[J]. Asian J Surg, 2011, 34(2):53-62.
[6]
张明迪,王健东.肝细胞肝癌淋巴结转移的研究进展[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2012,1(3): 202-204.
[7]
Xia F, Wu L, Lau WY, et al. Positive lymph node metastasis has a marked impact on the long-term survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e95889.
[8]
Yazici C, Niemeyer DJ, Iannitti DA, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: an update[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2014, 8(1): 63-82.
[9]
Wald C, Russo MW, Heimbach JK, et al. New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(2): 376-382.
[10]
Ohtani T, Shirai Y, Tsukada K, et al. Spread of gallbladder carcinoma: CT evaluation with pathologic correlation[J]. Abdom Imaging, 1996, 21(3): 195-201.
[11]
Harisinghani MG. Atlas of lymph node anatomy[M]. Springer: New York, 2013: 59-88.
[12]
Grobmyer SR, Wang L, Gonen M, et al. Perihepatic lymph node assessment in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for malignancy[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(2): 260-264.
[13]
周瀚,杨志刚,闵鹏秋.消化系统肿瘤腹部淋巴结转移的病理学基础及影像学特征[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(11): 1404-1406.
[14]
肖格林,张海涛,余水全,等.多层螺旋CT对结肠癌淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2015,13(5): 97-99.
[15]
叶小青,潘昌远.多层螺旋CT在消化系统常见肿瘤淋巴结转移诊断中的临床价值[J].医学影像学杂志,2015,25(4): 735-737.
[16]
王翔,罗春海.多层螺旋CT检查诊断宫颈癌淋巴结转移的临床研究[J].现代肿瘤医学,2015,23(20): 3036-3038.
[17]
Ichikawa T, Okada M, Kondo H, et al. Recommended iodine dose for multiphasic contrast-enhanced mutidetector-row computed tomography imaging of liver for assessing hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: multicenter prospective study in 77 general hospitals in Japan[J]. Acad Radiol, 2013, 20(9): 1130-1136.
[18]
张文,于长海,李英杰,等.肺癌CT值与肿瘤分化程度、病理类型及淋巴结转移相关性的临床研究[J].临床肺科杂志,2011,16(10): 1554-1555.
[19]
马文超,徐文贵,朱湘,等.18F-FDG PET/CT SUVmax及CT值双定量分析在肺癌纵隔淋巴结鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中国肿瘤临床,2011,38(5): 284-287.
[20]
Lim JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2003, 181(3): 819-827.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[5] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[6] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
[7] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[8] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[9] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[10] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[11] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[12] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[13] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
[14] 廖承煜, 江斌华, 黄龙, 王丹凤, 田毅峰, 陈实. 腹腔镜下肝左叶肝内胆管细胞癌根治术优化三步法的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 395-400.
[15] 赫嵘, 贾哲, 张珂, 李代京, 张萌, 蒋力. 基于PSM分析腹腔镜肝切除联合Hassab术治疗合并门静脉高压症肝癌疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 376-383.
阅读次数
全文


摘要