切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (05) : 694 -698. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2024.05.018

临床研究

负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检中的初步应用研究
林小勇1, 张兰霞2, 曾庆劲2, 贺需旗2, 谭雷2, 郭光辉2, 龙颖琳2, 李凯2, 吴宇轩2,()   
  1. 1. 517300 广东省河源市,龙川县人民医院超声诊疗中心
    2. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-23 出版日期:2024-10-10
  • 通信作者: 吴宇轩
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目(2023A03J0218,202201011075)

Preliminary study of the application of negative pressure aspiration biopsy needle in biopsy of complicated liver lesions

Xiaoyong Lin1, Lanxia Zhang2, Qingjin Zeng2, Xuqi He2, Lei Tan2, Guanghui Guo2, Yinglin Long2, Kai Li2, Yuxuan Wu2,()   

  1. 1. Ultrasound Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Longchuan County People's Hospital, Heyuan 517300, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2024-05-23 Published:2024-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Yuxuan Wu
引用本文:

林小勇, 张兰霞, 曾庆劲, 贺需旗, 谭雷, 郭光辉, 龙颖琳, 李凯, 吴宇轩. 负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检中的初步应用研究[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 694-698.

Xiaoyong Lin, Lanxia Zhang, Qingjin Zeng, Xuqi He, Lei Tan, Guanghui Guo, Yinglin Long, Kai Li, Yuxuan Wu. Preliminary study of the application of negative pressure aspiration biopsy needle in biopsy of complicated liver lesions[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(05): 694-698.

目的

探讨负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检中的应用价值及可行性。

方法

回顾性分析2022年3月至2022年9月于中山大学附属第三医院行超声引导下肝肿物消融并穿刺活检术的81例患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男66例,女15例;年龄30~73岁,中位年龄58岁。患者采用超声引导下Sonopsy-C1型18 G负压抽吸活检针穿过同轴针以不同角度来回抽吸取材,取材1~4次,获得满意组织,累计组织长度大于20 mm,10%福尔马林液固定,送病理学检查。再将微波或射频针通过同轴针消融病灶及烧灼针道,防止针道出血。根据病灶的大小和位置特征,将病灶分为困难组和非困难组。比较两组的基线情况和结局指标。两组标本长度等比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验。并发症发生率等比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

81例患者90个病灶,其中困难组59例,64个病灶;非困难组24例,26个病灶。困难组邻近重要部位距离为0(0,2)mm,明显小于非困难组的11(9,15)mm(Z=-7.767,P<0.05)。两组活检成功率和病理诊断率均为100%,均未见严重并发症。两组病灶最大径、病灶邻近部位、活检次数、标本最大长度和病理结果差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于肝内小病灶或紧邻危险部位的困难病灶,超声引导下使用负压抽吸活检针手动取材,既可在不增加取材次数的情况下取得足够行病理诊断的组织,又不增加并发症发生风险。

Objective

To evaluate the application value and feasibility of negative pressure aspiration biopsy needle in the biopsy of complicated liver lesions.

Methods

Clinical data of 81 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided liver tumor ablation and biopsy in the Third Affiliated Hospital ofSun Yat-sen University from March 2022 to September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 66 patients were male and 15 female, aged from 30 to 73 years, with a median age of 58 years. Ultrasound-guided Sonopsy-C1 18 G negative pressure aspiration biopsy needle was used to obtain the samples from different angles through the coaxial needle for 1-4 times. Satisfactory tissues were obtained. The accumulated tissue length was >20 mm, fixed in 10% formalin solution, and transferred for pathological examination. Then, microwave or radiofrequency needle was utilized to ablate the lesions and cauterize the needle track through the coaxial needle to prevent the bleeding from needle track. According to the size and location characteristics of the lesions, all lesions were divided into the complicated group and non-complicated group. Baseline data and outcome indexes were compared between two groups. The length of tissues between two groups was compared by Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test. The incidence of complications was compared by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

90 lesions were detected from 81 patients, including 59 cases and 64 lesions in the complicated group, and 24 cases and 26 lesions in the non-complicated group. In the complicated group, the distance from vital organs was 0 (0,2) mm, significantly less than 11 (9,15) mm in the non-complicated group (Z=-7.767, P<0.05). The success rate of biopsy and pathological diagnosis rate were 100% in two groups. No serious complications occurred in two groups. There were no significant differences in the maximum diameter of the lesions, adjacent organs of the lesions, the number of biopsy, the maximum length of the specimens and pathological results between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

For small liver lesions or complicated lesions adjacent to vital sites, manual sampling with negative pressure aspiration biopsy needle under ultrasound guidance can obtain sufficient tissues for pathological diagnosis without increasing the number of sampling or sacrificing the risk of complications.

图1 一例负压抽吸活检针在肝困难病灶活检注:a为病灶位于肝被膜下,紧邻肝被膜;b为每2条刻度之间为10 mm,取得2条标本,累计最大长度约30 mm
表1 困难组与非困难组患者一般资料比较
表2 困难组与非困难组病灶情况比较
表3 困难组与非困难组活检结局指标比较
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
[2]
Chen WQ, Zeng HM, Zheng RS, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2007[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2012, 24(1):1-8.
[3]
Sharma M, Lakhtakia S, Jagtap N, et al. EUS-guided left lobe liver biopsy: safer modality with similar diagnostic yield as right lobe: a pilot study[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2023, 11(2):E172-178.
[4]
丛文铭. 肝脏穿刺活检诊断临床病理学要则[J]. 临床与实验病理学杂志, 2012, 28(4):359-361.
[5]
Emre Meral C, Gencdal G, Akyildiz M, et al. A single-center experience: liver biopsy results during a year[J]. Hepatol Forum, 2022, 3(2):41-44.
[6]
刘建锋, 李小梅, 严志刚. 两种肝穿活检针穿刺活检效果对比观察[J]. 人民军医, 2016, 59(3):250-251.
[7]
陶南生, 孙秋水, 吴斯琪, 等. 分析超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸活检(US-FNAB)在不同大小甲状腺结节诊断中的应用效果[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2021, 5(13):100-101.
[8]
Mok SRS, Diehl DL, Johal AS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles[J]. Endosc Int Open, 2019, 7(1):E62-71.
[9]
孟繁坤, 徐策, 张海英, 等. 超声引导下两种穿刺活检术对肝病的临床价值[J]. 中国超声诊断杂志, 2002(7):509-510.
[10]
Obaitan I, Saxena R, Al-Haddad MAJT, et al. EUS guided liver biopsy[J]. Tech Innovat Gastroi, 2022, 24(1):66-75.
[11]
Hua S, Hu X, Zhao X, et al. The diagnostic value and safety of modified needle aspiration biopsy for superficial lymphadenectasis[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 968706.
[12]
Suo L, Chang R, Padmanabhan V, et al. For diagnosis of liver masses, fine-needle aspiration versus needle core biopsy: which is better?[J]. J Am Soc Cytopathol, 2018, 7(1):46-49.
[13]
Hamidian Jahromi A, Ballard DH, Bahrami R, et al. Comparison of different techniques of ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy of liver in a swine model[J]. Hepat Mon, 2015, 15(6):e26439.
[14]
吴海峰. 超声引导自动活检枪在肝脏疾病诊断中的应用价值[J]. 吉林医学, 2012, 33(12):2611.
[15]
吴杰, 龚黎, 闻宝杰, 等. 16G与18G活检针在超声引导下肝组织穿刺中的有效性与安全性比较[J]. 江苏大学学报(医学版), 2023, 33(1):67-69, 75.
[16]
赵夏夏, 王银, 孟颖, 等. 超声引导自动活检术在肝脏疾病中的应用[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2005, 26(6):456.
[17]
Tian G, Kong D, Jiang TA, et al. Complications after percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a population of more than 12, 000 patients from 51 cohort studies[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2020, 39(7):1355-1365.
[18]
Khalifa A, Rockey DC. The utility of liver biopsy in 2020[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2020, 36(3):184-191.
[19]
Thomaides-Brears HB, Alkhouri N, Allende D, et al. Incidence of complications from percutaneous biopsy in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2022, 67(7): 3366-3394.
[20]
Ozeki Y, Kanogawa N, Ogasawara S, et al. Liver biopsy technique in the era of genomic cancer therapies: a single-center retrospective analysis[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2022, 27(9):1459-1466.
[21]
Cunha-Silva M, Torres LD, Fernandes MF, et al. Changes in indications for outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy over 5 years: from hepatitis C to fatty liver disease[J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 45(8):579-584.
[1] 诸佳玮, 陈强, 王辉阳, 蒋天安. 双极射频活检针在肝粗针活检止血的研发与初步应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 69-74.
[2] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 欧阳佳裕, 李刚, 贺露瑶, 罗娜. 双层探测器光谱CT在早期原发性肝癌中的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 557-561.
[5] 陈志坚, 俞建达, 池小斌, 吕立志, 陈永标. 三维可视化技术在腹腔镜肝巨大肿瘤切除中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 302-307.
[6] 黄俊豪, 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 血小板相关参数对肝内胆管细胞癌根治性切除患者预后预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 308-312.
[7] 马欢欢, 马晨辉, 邓小博, 王博方, 何普毅, 王云鹏, 许博, 俞荣, 王娜, 陈昊. 肝癌实体瘤治疗疗效评价系统的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 377-383.
[8] 王凯飞, 牟怡平, 李晓辉, 王瑞涛, 侯惠莲, 张月浪. 原发性肝平滑肌肉瘤临床病理特征及疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 357-362.
[9] 张婵, 吕瑶, 张小燕, 张鸣青. 不同时机局部神经阻滞在开腹肝切除中的镇痛效果比较[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 189-194.
[10] 张传海, 周毅, 王一帆, 马金良. 基于"红/黄交界线"胆囊板入路联合ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜解剖性肝切除(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 62-67.
[11] 沈佳佳, 何经雄, 王芳, 江艺, 潘凡, 张小进. ICG荧光引导腹腔镜射频消融在合并严重大结节肝硬化小肝癌患者治疗中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 68-71.
[12] 张宇, 余灵祥, 杨永平, 赵德希, 刁广浩, 杨木易, 赵亮, 刘佳, 李鹏, 张宁, 任辉. 原发性肝癌Ⅲa期降期后肝切除临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 78-82.
[13] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[14] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要