切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 186 -189. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.03.014

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

单中心胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效20年变化分析
吴祥1, 曾柏强1, 陈洁盈1, 张红卫1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-11 出版日期:2016-06-10
  • 通信作者: 张红卫
  • 基金资助:
    北京市希思科临床肿瘤学研究基金(Y-2009-017)

Perioperative curative effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center analysis over two decades

Xiang Wu1, Baiqiang Zeng1, Jieying Chen1, Hongwei Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2016-02-11 Published:2016-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Hongwei Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hongwei, Email:
引用本文:

吴祥, 曾柏强, 陈洁盈, 张红卫. 单中心胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效20年变化分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 186-189.

Xiang Wu, Baiqiang Zeng, Jieying Chen, Hongwei Zhang. Perioperative curative effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center analysis over two decades[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 186-189.

目的

分析单中心胰十二指肠切除术(PD)围手术期疗效20年变化。

方法

回顾性分析1994年1月至2013年12月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院行PD且有完整病历资料的523例患者临床资料。根据手术实施的年代将患者分为后10年组和前10年组。后10年组396例,其中男246例,女150例,年龄19~97岁,中位年龄58岁;前10年组127例,其中男69例,女58例,年龄6~79岁,中位年龄56岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。比较并分析两组患者围手术期情况。两组围手术期情况比较采用秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

后10年组中位手术时间340(187~920)min明显长于前10年组的310 (180~730)min (Z=3.12,P<0.05),术中出血量300(50~4 500)ml明显少于前10年组的600(200~18 000)ml(Z=-7.62,P<0.05),术后住院时间23(5~148)d明显短于前10年组的25(11~309)d(Z=-2.82,P<0.05),围手术期死亡率6%(24/396)明显低于前10年组的12%(15/127) (χ2=4.61,P<0.05)。后10年组术后并发症发生率、术后并发症患者二次手术率分别为39%(156/396)、29%(45/156),前10年组相应为46%(58/127)、16%(9/58),后10年组的二次手术率明显高于前10年组(χ2=3.98,P<0.05)。二次手术最常见原因为腹腔出血。

结论

随着术中失血量的降低、术后住院时间的缩短和围手术期死亡率的降低,PD已成为一种安全有效的术式。术后发生严重并发症时,及时行二次手术可能对降低围手术期死亡率有重要意义。

Objective

To analyze the perioperative curative effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a single center over two decades.

Methods

Clinical data of 523 patients who had complete medical record and underwent PD in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between January 1994 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the latter decade group and the former decade group according to the year when surgery was performed. Among the 396 patients in the latter decade group, 246 were males and 150 were females with the age ranging from 19 to 97 years old and the median of 58 years old. Among the 127 patients in the former decade group, 69 were males and 58 were females with the age ranging from 6 to 79 years old and the median of 56 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The perioperative conditions of two groups were compared and analyzed using rank sum test and the comparison of rate was conducted using Chi-square test.

Results

The median length of surgery in the latter decade group was 340(187-920) min, significantly longer than 310(180-730) min in the former decade group (Z=3.12, P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the latter decade group was 300(50-4 500) ml, significantly less than 600(200-18 000) ml in the former decade group (Z=-7.62, P<0.05). The postoperative length of stay in the latter decade group was 23(5-148) d, significantly shorter than 25(11-309) d in the former decade group (Z=-2.82, P<0.05). The perioperative mortality in the latter decade group was 6% (24/396), significantly lower than 12%(15/127) in the former decade group (χ2=4.61, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications and the reoperation rate of the patients with postoperative complications in the latter decade group were respectively 39% (156/396) and 29%(45/156), while those in the former decade group were respectively 46% (58/127) and 16% (9/58). The reoperation rate in the latter decade group was significantly higher than that in the former decade group (χ2=3.98, P<0.05). The most common reason for reoperation was intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

Conclusions

PD has become a safe and effective operation as the intraoperative blood loss, the postoperative length of stay and the perioperative mortality decrease. Timely reoperation may has an important significance in reducing the perioperative mortality when severe postoperative complications happen.

表1 两组胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期情况比较
表2 两组胰十二指肠切除术患者术后并发症情况(例)
表3 两组胰十二指肠切除术后并发症患者二次手术原因(例)
[1]
Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(1): 10-15.
[2]
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006, 10(9): 1199-1210.
[3]
Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 242(4): 540-547.
[4]
de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality[J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(3): 404-410.
[5]
Lea MS, Stahlgren LH. Is resection appropriate for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas? A cost-benefit analysis[J]. Am J Surg, 1987, 154(6): 651-654.
[6]
Shapiro TM. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients[J]. Ann Surg, 1975, 182(6): 715-721.
[7]
Crile G Jr. The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1970, 130(6): 1049-1053.
[8]
Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(4): 530-536.
[9]
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes[J]. Ann Surg, 1997, 226(3): 248-260.
[10]
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(7): 655-662.
[11]
Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 215(6): 810-819.
[12]
Amini A, Miura JT, Jayakrishnan TT, et al. Is local resection adequate for T1 stage ampullary cancer?[J]. HPB, 2015, 17(1): 66-71.
[13]
Shinkawa H, Takemura S, Kiyota S, et al. Long-term outcome of surgical treatment for ampullary carcinoma[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(116): 1010-1012.
[14]
Fernández-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D, et al. Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital[J]. Surgery, 2012, 152(3 Suppl 1): S56-63.
[15]
Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, et al. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality[J]. Ann Surg, 1993, 217(5): 430-438.
[16]
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(5): 761-768.
[17]
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(1): 20-25.
[18]
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition[J]. Surgery, 2005, 138(1): 8-13.
[19]
Stojadinovic A, Brooks A, Hoos A, et al. An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2003, 196(6): 954-964.
[20]
Wiltberger G, Schmelzle M, Tautenhahn HM, et al. Alternative treatment of symptomatic pancreatic fistula[J]. J Surg Res, 2015,196(1): 82-89.
[1] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[2] 刘鹏, 周莹佳, 常彦峰, 甄平, 李生贵, 刘军, 周胜虎. 类风湿关节炎行关节置换围术期风险管理的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 540-548.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[5] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[6] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[9] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[10] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[11] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[12] 惠立良, 王成果, 段东峰, 王健. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 吉茜茜, 田尧, 马林, 钱进. 红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值联合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡率的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 433-438.
阅读次数
全文


摘要