切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (03) : 186 -189. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.03.014

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

单中心胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效20年变化分析
吴祥1, 曾柏强1, 陈洁盈1, 张红卫1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-11 出版日期:2016-06-10
  • 通信作者: 张红卫
  • 基金资助:
    北京市希思科临床肿瘤学研究基金(Y-2009-017)

Perioperative curative effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center analysis over two decades

Xiang Wu1, Baiqiang Zeng1, Jieying Chen1, Hongwei Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2016-02-11 Published:2016-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Hongwei Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hongwei, Email:
引用本文:

吴祥, 曾柏强, 陈洁盈, 张红卫. 单中心胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效20年变化分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(03): 186-189.

Xiang Wu, Baiqiang Zeng, Jieying Chen, Hongwei Zhang. Perioperative curative effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center analysis over two decades[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(03): 186-189.

目的

分析单中心胰十二指肠切除术(PD)围手术期疗效20年变化。

方法

回顾性分析1994年1月至2013年12月中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院行PD且有完整病历资料的523例患者临床资料。根据手术实施的年代将患者分为后10年组和前10年组。后10年组396例,其中男246例,女150例,年龄19~97岁,中位年龄58岁;前10年组127例,其中男69例,女58例,年龄6~79岁,中位年龄56岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。比较并分析两组患者围手术期情况。两组围手术期情况比较采用秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

后10年组中位手术时间340(187~920)min明显长于前10年组的310 (180~730)min (Z=3.12,P<0.05),术中出血量300(50~4 500)ml明显少于前10年组的600(200~18 000)ml(Z=-7.62,P<0.05),术后住院时间23(5~148)d明显短于前10年组的25(11~309)d(Z=-2.82,P<0.05),围手术期死亡率6%(24/396)明显低于前10年组的12%(15/127) (χ2=4.61,P<0.05)。后10年组术后并发症发生率、术后并发症患者二次手术率分别为39%(156/396)、29%(45/156),前10年组相应为46%(58/127)、16%(9/58),后10年组的二次手术率明显高于前10年组(χ2=3.98,P<0.05)。二次手术最常见原因为腹腔出血。

结论

随着术中失血量的降低、术后住院时间的缩短和围手术期死亡率的降低,PD已成为一种安全有效的术式。术后发生严重并发症时,及时行二次手术可能对降低围手术期死亡率有重要意义。

Objective

To analyze the perioperative curative effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a single center over two decades.

Methods

Clinical data of 523 patients who had complete medical record and underwent PD in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University between January 1994 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the latter decade group and the former decade group according to the year when surgery was performed. Among the 396 patients in the latter decade group, 246 were males and 150 were females with the age ranging from 19 to 97 years old and the median of 58 years old. Among the 127 patients in the former decade group, 69 were males and 58 were females with the age ranging from 6 to 79 years old and the median of 56 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The perioperative conditions of two groups were compared and analyzed using rank sum test and the comparison of rate was conducted using Chi-square test.

Results

The median length of surgery in the latter decade group was 340(187-920) min, significantly longer than 310(180-730) min in the former decade group (Z=3.12, P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the latter decade group was 300(50-4 500) ml, significantly less than 600(200-18 000) ml in the former decade group (Z=-7.62, P<0.05). The postoperative length of stay in the latter decade group was 23(5-148) d, significantly shorter than 25(11-309) d in the former decade group (Z=-2.82, P<0.05). The perioperative mortality in the latter decade group was 6% (24/396), significantly lower than 12%(15/127) in the former decade group (χ2=4.61, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications and the reoperation rate of the patients with postoperative complications in the latter decade group were respectively 39% (156/396) and 29%(45/156), while those in the former decade group were respectively 46% (58/127) and 16% (9/58). The reoperation rate in the latter decade group was significantly higher than that in the former decade group (χ2=3.98, P<0.05). The most common reason for reoperation was intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

Conclusions

PD has become a safe and effective operation as the intraoperative blood loss, the postoperative length of stay and the perioperative mortality decrease. Timely reoperation may has an important significance in reducing the perioperative mortality when severe postoperative complications happen.

表1 两组胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期情况比较
表2 两组胰十二指肠切除术患者术后并发症情况(例)
表3 两组胰十二指肠切除术后并发症患者二次手术原因(例)
[1]
Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, et al. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 244(1): 10-15.
[2]
Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006, 10(9): 1199-1210.
[3]
Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, et al. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 242(4): 540-547.
[4]
de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality[J]. Br J Surg, 2012, 99(3): 404-410.
[5]
Lea MS, Stahlgren LH. Is resection appropriate for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas? A cost-benefit analysis[J]. Am J Surg, 1987, 154(6): 651-654.
[6]
Shapiro TM. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients[J]. Ann Surg, 1975, 182(6): 715-721.
[7]
Crile G Jr. The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1970, 130(6): 1049-1053.
[8]
Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 220(4): 530-536.
[9]
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes[J]. Ann Surg, 1997, 226(3): 248-260.
[10]
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(7): 655-662.
[11]
Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 215(6): 810-819.
[12]
Amini A, Miura JT, Jayakrishnan TT, et al. Is local resection adequate for T1 stage ampullary cancer?[J]. HPB, 2015, 17(1): 66-71.
[13]
Shinkawa H, Takemura S, Kiyota S, et al. Long-term outcome of surgical treatment for ampullary carcinoma[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(116): 1010-1012.
[14]
Fernández-del Castillo C, Morales-Oyarvide V, McGrath D, et al. Evolution of the Whipple procedure at the Massachusetts General Hospital[J]. Surgery, 2012, 152(3 Suppl 1): S56-63.
[15]
Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, et al. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality[J]. Ann Surg, 1993, 217(5): 430-438.
[16]
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(5): 761-768.
[17]
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(1): 20-25.
[18]
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition[J]. Surgery, 2005, 138(1): 8-13.
[19]
Stojadinovic A, Brooks A, Hoos A, et al. An evidence-based approach to the surgical management of resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2003, 196(6): 954-964.
[20]
Wiltberger G, Schmelzle M, Tautenhahn HM, et al. Alternative treatment of symptomatic pancreatic fistula[J]. J Surg Res, 2015,196(1): 82-89.
[1] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[8] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[9] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[10] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[11] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[12] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[13] 林科灿, 罗柳平. 肝胰十二指肠切除术在胆囊癌和胆管癌应用中的关键问题[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 774-778.
[14] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[15] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?