切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 209 -213. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.04.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

保留Oddi括约肌功能的三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石
王一飞1, 周华丁1, 冉茜1, 马保金1, 殷保兵1,()   
  1. 1. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-17 出版日期:2016-08-10
  • 通信作者: 殷保兵
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生局科研基金(20134229)

Combined use of endoscopy, choledochoscopy and laparascopy with function of sphincter of Oddi preserved for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis

Yifei Wang1, Huading Zhou1, Qian Ran1, Baojin Ma1, Baobing Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2016-02-17 Published:2016-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Baobing Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Baobing, Email:
引用本文:

王一飞, 周华丁, 冉茜, 马保金, 殷保兵. 保留Oddi括约肌功能的三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(04): 209-213.

Yifei Wang, Huading Zhou, Qian Ran, Baojin Ma, Baobing Yin. Combined use of endoscopy, choledochoscopy and laparascopy with function of sphincter of Oddi preserved for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(04): 209-213.

目的

探讨内镜下鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)联合腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)、腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年12月至2015年11月复旦大学附属华山医院收治的79例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者临床资料。其中男34例,女45例;年龄21~99岁,中位年龄57岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据手术方式不同,将患者分为ENBD+LCBDE+LC(16例),ERCP+LC(41例)及LCBDE+LC (22例)组。3组患者住院费用比较采用单因素方差分析和LSD-t检验,结石残余率和并发症发生率比较采用Fisher确切概率法。

结果

ENBD+LC+LCBDE、ERCP+LC、LCBDE+LC组的平均住院费用分别为(2.38±0.17)、(2.83±0.25)、(2.16±0.22)万元,ENBD+LC+LCBDE组和LCBDE+LC组明显低于ERCP+LC组(LSD-t=-4.352,-3.147;P<0.05)。ERCP+LC组术后发生胰腺炎9例,反流性胆管炎2例,并发症发生率为27%(11/41);LCBDE+LC组术后发生胆漏2例,并发症发生率为9%(2/22);ENBD+LCBDE+LC组无发生并发症,3组差异有统计学意义(P=0.027)。ENBD+LC+LCBDE、ERCP+LC、LCBDE+LC组的结石残余率分别为0(0/16)、5%(2/41)、4%(1/22),差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。

结论

ENBD+LC+LCBDE三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石是一种安全有效的术式,其保留了Oddi括约肌功能,明显降低术后并发症发生率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCDBE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in treating cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

Methods

Clinical data of 79 patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis admitted to Huashan Hospital of Fudan University between December 2014 and November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 34 males and 45 females, aged from 21 to 99 years old with a median age of 57 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different surgical procedures, the patients were divided into the ENBD+LCBDE+LC group (n=16), the ERCP+LC group (n=41) and the LCBDE+LC group (n=22). The hospitalization expense in three groups was compared using one-way analysis of variance and LSD-t test. The rate of residual stone and the incidence of complications were compared using Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

The average hospitalization expense in the ENBD+LCBDE+LC group and LCBDE+LC group were respectively (2.38±0.17)×104 and (2.16±0.22)×104 yuan, significantly less than (2.83±0.25) ×104 yuan in the ERCP+LC group (LSD-t=-4.352, -3.147; P<0.05). In the ERCP+LC group, pancreatitis was observed in 9 cases and refluxing cholangitis in 2 cases after operation, and the incidence of complications was 27% (11/41). In the LCBDE+LC group, bile leakage was observed in 2 cases after operation, and the incidence of complications was 9%(2/22). No postoperative complication was observed in the ENBD+LCBDE+LC group. Significant difference was observed in the incidence of complications among three groups (P=0.027). The rate of residual stone in the ENBD+LC+LCBDE, ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC groups was respectively 0(0/16), 5%(2/41) and 4%(1/22), and no significant difference was observed (P=1.000).

Conclusions

Combined use of ENBD, LC and LCBDE is a safe and effective treatment for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis. It preserves the function of sphincter of Oddi and significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.

表1 三组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的一般资料(例)
[1]
Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(4):457-463.
[2]
Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, et al. Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ[J]. Br J Surg, 2006, 93(10):1185-1191.
[3]
Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, et al. A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009, 19(6):713-720.
[4]
Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease[J]. Arch Surg, 2010, 145(1):28-33.
[5]
Woods CM, Mawe GM, Toouli J, et al. The sphincter of Oddi: understanding its control and function[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2005, 17 Suppl 1: 31-40.
[6]
Buxbaum J. Modern management of common bile duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2013, 23(2):251-275.
[7]
Kim TH, Kim JH, Seo DW, et al. International consensus guidelines for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016, 83(1):37-47.
[8]
Rebelo A, Ribeiro PM, Correia AP, et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation after limited sphincterotomy for difficult biliary stones[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 4(5):180-184.
[9]
Teoh AY, Cheung FK, Hu B, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(2):341-345.
[10]
Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57(2): 151-155.
[11]
Liao WC, Lee CT, Chang CY, et al. Randomized trial of 1 minute versus 5 minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72(6):1154-1162.
[12]
Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones[J]. Gastroenterology, 2004, 127(5): 1291-1299.
[13]
Natsui M, Honma T, Genda T, et al. Effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy on bacterial contamination of the biliary tract[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23(9):818-824.
[14]
Yi HJ, Hong G, Min SK, et al. Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, 25(3):250-253.
[15]
Ha JP, Tang CN, Siu WT, et al. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2004, 51(60):1605-1608.
[16]
Tsujino T, Kawabe T, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone: immediate and long-term outcomes in 1000 patients[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007, 5(1):130-137.
[17]
Feng Y, Zhu H, Chen X, et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2012, 47(6):655-663.
[18]
Jin PP, Cheng JF, Liu D, et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(18):5548-5556.
[19]
Lyon M, Menon S, Jain A, et al. Use of biliary stent in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(5): 1094-1098.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[13] 阿冲罗布, 陈颖, 谢德坤. 腹腔镜外囊完整剥离术治疗肝包虫病效果及对患者肝功能、预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[14] 索郎多杰, 高红桥, 巴桑顿珠, 仁桑. 腹腔镜下不同术式治疗肝囊型包虫病的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要