切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (04) : 209 -213. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2016.04.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

保留Oddi括约肌功能的三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石
王一飞1, 周华丁1, 冉茜1, 马保金1, 殷保兵1,()   
  1. 1. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-17 出版日期:2016-08-10
  • 通信作者: 殷保兵
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生局科研基金(20134229)

Combined use of endoscopy, choledochoscopy and laparascopy with function of sphincter of Oddi preserved for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis

Yifei Wang1, Huading Zhou1, Qian Ran1, Baojin Ma1, Baobing Yin1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
  • Received:2016-02-17 Published:2016-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Baobing Yin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yin Baobing, Email:
引用本文:

王一飞, 周华丁, 冉茜, 马保金, 殷保兵. 保留Oddi括约肌功能的三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 05(04): 209-213.

Yifei Wang, Huading Zhou, Qian Ran, Baojin Ma, Baobing Yin. Combined use of endoscopy, choledochoscopy and laparascopy with function of sphincter of Oddi preserved for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 05(04): 209-213.

目的

探讨内镜下鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)联合腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)、腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年12月至2015年11月复旦大学附属华山医院收治的79例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者临床资料。其中男34例,女45例;年龄21~99岁,中位年龄57岁。所有患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据手术方式不同,将患者分为ENBD+LCBDE+LC(16例),ERCP+LC(41例)及LCBDE+LC (22例)组。3组患者住院费用比较采用单因素方差分析和LSD-t检验,结石残余率和并发症发生率比较采用Fisher确切概率法。

结果

ENBD+LC+LCBDE、ERCP+LC、LCBDE+LC组的平均住院费用分别为(2.38±0.17)、(2.83±0.25)、(2.16±0.22)万元,ENBD+LC+LCBDE组和LCBDE+LC组明显低于ERCP+LC组(LSD-t=-4.352,-3.147;P<0.05)。ERCP+LC组术后发生胰腺炎9例,反流性胆管炎2例,并发症发生率为27%(11/41);LCBDE+LC组术后发生胆漏2例,并发症发生率为9%(2/22);ENBD+LCBDE+LC组无发生并发症,3组差异有统计学意义(P=0.027)。ENBD+LC+LCBDE、ERCP+LC、LCBDE+LC组的结石残余率分别为0(0/16)、5%(2/41)、4%(1/22),差异无统计学意义(P=1.000)。

结论

ENBD+LC+LCBDE三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石是一种安全有效的术式,其保留了Oddi括约肌功能,明显降低术后并发症发生率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCDBE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in treating cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

Methods

Clinical data of 79 patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis admitted to Huashan Hospital of Fudan University between December 2014 and November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 34 males and 45 females, aged from 21 to 99 years old with a median age of 57 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different surgical procedures, the patients were divided into the ENBD+LCBDE+LC group (n=16), the ERCP+LC group (n=41) and the LCBDE+LC group (n=22). The hospitalization expense in three groups was compared using one-way analysis of variance and LSD-t test. The rate of residual stone and the incidence of complications were compared using Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

The average hospitalization expense in the ENBD+LCBDE+LC group and LCBDE+LC group were respectively (2.38±0.17)×104 and (2.16±0.22)×104 yuan, significantly less than (2.83±0.25) ×104 yuan in the ERCP+LC group (LSD-t=-4.352, -3.147; P<0.05). In the ERCP+LC group, pancreatitis was observed in 9 cases and refluxing cholangitis in 2 cases after operation, and the incidence of complications was 27% (11/41). In the LCBDE+LC group, bile leakage was observed in 2 cases after operation, and the incidence of complications was 9%(2/22). No postoperative complication was observed in the ENBD+LCBDE+LC group. Significant difference was observed in the incidence of complications among three groups (P=0.027). The rate of residual stone in the ENBD+LC+LCBDE, ERCP+LC and LCBDE+LC groups was respectively 0(0/16), 5%(2/41) and 4%(1/22), and no significant difference was observed (P=1.000).

Conclusions

Combined use of ENBD, LC and LCBDE is a safe and effective treatment for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis. It preserves the function of sphincter of Oddi and significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.

表1 三组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的一般资料(例)
[1]
Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 206(4):457-463.
[2]
Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, et al. Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ[J]. Br J Surg, 2006, 93(10):1185-1191.
[3]
Noble H, Tranter S, Chesworth T, et al. A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009, 19(6):713-720.
[4]
Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease[J]. Arch Surg, 2010, 145(1):28-33.
[5]
Woods CM, Mawe GM, Toouli J, et al. The sphincter of Oddi: understanding its control and function[J]. Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2005, 17 Suppl 1: 31-40.
[6]
Buxbaum J. Modern management of common bile duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2013, 23(2):251-275.
[7]
Kim TH, Kim JH, Seo DW, et al. International consensus guidelines for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2016, 83(1):37-47.
[8]
Rebelo A, Ribeiro PM, Correia AP, et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation after limited sphincterotomy for difficult biliary stones[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 4(5):180-184.
[9]
Teoh AY, Cheung FK, Hu B, et al. Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone for removal of bile duct stones[J]. Gastroenterology, 2013, 144(2):341-345.
[10]
Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2003, 57(2): 151-155.
[11]
Liao WC, Lee CT, Chang CY, et al. Randomized trial of 1 minute versus 5 minute endoscopic balloon dilation for extraction of bile duct stones[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72(6):1154-1162.
[12]
Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones[J]. Gastroenterology, 2004, 127(5): 1291-1299.
[13]
Natsui M, Honma T, Genda T, et al. Effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy on bacterial contamination of the biliary tract[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2011, 23(9):818-824.
[14]
Yi HJ, Hong G, Min SK, et al. Long-term outcome of primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with choledochoscopy[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2015, 25(3):250-253.
[15]
Ha JP, Tang CN, Siu WT, et al. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2004, 51(60):1605-1608.
[16]
Tsujino T, Kawabe T, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone: immediate and long-term outcomes in 1000 patients[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007, 5(1):130-137.
[17]
Feng Y, Zhu H, Chen X, et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Gastroenterol, 2012, 47(6):655-663.
[18]
Jin PP, Cheng JF, Liu D, et al. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(18):5548-5556.
[19]
Lyon M, Menon S, Jain A, et al. Use of biliary stent in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(5): 1094-1098.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?