切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 104 -107. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.02.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

损伤控制性手术在车祸肝脏损伤患者治疗中的应用
何文广1, 刘小梨1, 姚金科1, 刘建平2,()   
  1. 1. 511300 广州市增城区人民医院普通外科
    2. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-19 出版日期:2017-04-10
  • 通信作者: 刘建平

Application of damage control surgery in the treatment of liver trauma caused by traffic accident

Wenguang He1, Xiaoli Liu1, Jinke Yao1, Jianping Liu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zengcheng District people's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 511300, China
    2. Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2016-11-19 Published:2017-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Jianping Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding Author: Liu Jianping, Email:
引用本文:

何文广, 刘小梨, 姚金科, 刘建平. 损伤控制性手术在车祸肝脏损伤患者治疗中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(02): 104-107.

Wenguang He, Xiaoli Liu, Jinke Yao, Jianping Liu. Application of damage control surgery in the treatment of liver trauma caused by traffic accident[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(02): 104-107.

目的

探讨损伤控制性手术在车祸肝脏损伤患者治疗中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2005年1月至2015年12月因车祸在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院及广州市增城区人民医院接受治疗的103例急性严重肝脏损伤患者临床资料。按照治疗方案分为损伤控制组和对照组。损伤控制组52例,其中男40例,女12例;平均年龄(30±5)岁;实施损伤控制性手术,先对腹部创伤进行快速处理,待患者生理状况相对稳定后再行确定性手术。对照组51例,其中男41例,女10例;平均年龄(31±5)岁;实施肝裂伤创面致密缝合。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。观察两组患者手术时间、术中出血量等围手术期情况。两组正态分布资料的比较采用t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

损伤控制组的手术时间为(109±12) min,明显短于对照组的(191±13) min (t=-32.97,P<0.05);损伤控制组的术中出血量为(2 021±301)ml,明显低于对照组的(3 074±460)ml(t=-13.77,P<0.05);损伤控制组的ICU住院时间为(11±4)d,明显长于对照组的(7±3)d(t=4.81,P<0.05);损伤控制组的死亡率为12%(6/52),明显低于对照组的27%(14/51) (χ2=4.166,P<0.05)。

结论

采取损伤控制性手术方案治疗车祸所致严重肝脏损伤是有效、安全的,其可以缩短治疗手术时间、降低术中出血量和死亡率。

Objective

To investigate the application value of damage control surgery in the treatment of liver trauma caused by traffic accident.

Methods

Clinical data of 103 patients with acute severe liver trauma caused by traffic accident who were treated in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University and Zengcheng District People's Hospital of Guangzhou between January 2005 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into the damage control group (n=52) and the control group (n=51) according to treatment protocols. In the damage control group, 40 were males and 12 were females with the avarage age of (30±5) years old. The damage control surgery was performed. Firstly abdominal wound was rapidly processed, and then definitive surgery was performed after the physiological status of the patients was relatively stable. In the control group, 41 were males and 10 were females with the avarage age of (31±5) years old. The liver laceration wound surface was tightly sutured. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The perioperative conditions such as the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of two groups were observed. The normal distribution data of two groups were compared using t test, and the ratio was compared using Chi-square test.

Results

The operation time in the damage control group was (109±12) min, significantly shorter than (191±13) min in the control group (t=-32.97, P<0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the damage control group was (2 021±301) ml, significantly less than (3 074±460) ml in the control group (t=-13.77, P<0.05). The length of ICU stay in the damage control group was (11±4) d, significantly longer than (7±3) d in the control group (t=4.81, P<0.05). The mortality in the damage control group was 12%(6/52), significantly lower than 27%(14/51) in the control group (χ2=4.166, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Damage control surgery is an efficacious and safe treatment for severe liver trauma caused by traffic accident. It can shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss and mortality.

表1 损伤控制组与对照组患者肝脏损伤分级比较(例)
[1]
Skandalakis JE, Skandalakis LJ, Skandalakis PN, et a1. Hepatic surgical anatomy[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2004, 84(2):413-435.
[2]
黎介寿. "损伤控制"在非创伤腹部外科患者中的应用[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2012,1(1):5-7.
[3]
蔡辉华,陈学敏,孙冬林,等.超声刀联合双极电凝在腹腔镜下肝脏切除术的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2013,51(11):1042-1043.
[4]
李正天,姜洪池.肝外伤处理的进展与趋势[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2012,18(1):69-72.
[5]
时吉庆,秦红军,罗伟,等.外伤性肝破裂的个体化治疗[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2015,4(3):161-164.
[6]
储文军,马大喜,朱建华,等.损伤控制性手术在严重肝脏外伤中的应用价值[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2012,24(4):275-277.
[7]
谭友春,卢榜裕,蔡小勇,等.严重肝外伤外科治疗91例分析[J]. 肝胆外科杂志,2006,14(1):53-55.
[8]
徐卫卫,朱斌,严栋梁,等.损伤控制理论在复杂肝外伤中的运用[J].中外医学研究,2015(7):42-44.
[9]
涂清华,黄进.严重肝外伤手术治疗效果分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2015(16):2379-2380.
[10]
周健,黄绪广,毕建威,等.严重外伤性肝破裂手术治疗25例分析[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2016,5(1):29-31.
[11]
何津,张大为,张海光,等.肝周纱布填塞治疗Ⅴ级肝脏损伤[J].河北医科大学学报,2014(6):731-732.
[12]
胡宁,江艺,张小进.纱布填塞用于腹部手术难以控制的大出血[J].腹部外科,2011,24(5):282-283.
[13]
柯立池,万仁华,高良辉,等.损伤控制性手术逆转肝外伤凝血功能障碍的诊治体会[J].广东医学,2014(18):2868-2869.
[14]
黎小平,胡立春,赵绥明.损伤控制性手术治疗严重肝外伤20例[J].广西医科大学学报,2012,29(1):136-137.
[15]
黎介寿.对"腹部损伤控制性外科"的理解[J].中华创伤杂志,2009,25(1):3-5.
[16]
周尊强,周光文.重视纱布填塞在严重肝外伤中的应用[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2016,5(3):132-134.
[17]
Nicol AJ, Hommes M, Primrose R, et a1. Packing for control of hemorrhage in major liver trauma[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 31(3):569-574.
[1] 李淼, 朱连华, 韩鹏, 姜波, 费翔. 高帧频超声造影评价肝细胞癌血管形态与风险因素的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 911-915.
[2] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[3] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[4] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[5] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[6] 吕衡, 董理聪, 谢海琴, 赵卓非, 刘俐, 孙德胜. 基于CT-超声对照的肝脏局灶性病变超声漏诊状况分析:一项单中心横断面质量控制调查报告[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 712-716.
[7] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[8] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[9] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[10] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[11] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[12] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[13] 叶晓琳, 刘云飞, 庞明泉, 王海久, 任利, 侯立朝, 于文昊, 王志鑫, 樊海宁. 肝再生细胞来源及调控机制的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 96-99.
[14] 彭旭, 邵永孚, 李铎, 邹瑞, 邢贞明. 结肠肝曲癌的诊断和外科治疗[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 108-110.
[15] 张大涯, 陈世锔, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 李达, 白飞虎. 肠道微生物群对代谢相关脂肪性肝病发展的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 828-833.
阅读次数
全文


摘要