切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 172 -176. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.03.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

捆绑式胰胃吻合术患者术后生活质量调查的初步报告
王亮1, 金星2, 于源泉1, 周冬儿1, 金赟1, 张小小1, 刘达人1, 李江涛1,(), 彭淑牖1   
  1. 1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院普通外科
    2. 350005 福州,福建医科大学附属第一医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-22 出版日期:2017-06-10
  • 通信作者: 李江涛
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81570559); 浙江省卫生厅科研基金(2011KYA069)

Preliminary report of quality of life survey in patients after binding pancreaticogastrostomy

Liang Wang1, Xing Jin2, Yuanquan Yu1, Donger Zhou1, Yun Jin1, Xiaoxiao Zhang1, Daren Liu1, Jiangtao Li1,(), Shuyou Peng1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
    2. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, China
  • Received:2017-03-22 Published:2017-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jiangtao Li
  • About author:
    Correspondent author: Li Jiangtao, Email:
引用本文:

王亮, 金星, 于源泉, 周冬儿, 金赟, 张小小, 刘达人, 李江涛, 彭淑牖. 捆绑式胰胃吻合术患者术后生活质量调查的初步报告[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(03): 172-176.

Liang Wang, Xing Jin, Yuanquan Yu, Donger Zhou, Yun Jin, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Daren Liu, Jiangtao Li, Shuyou Peng. Preliminary report of quality of life survey in patients after binding pancreaticogastrostomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(03): 172-176.

目的

探讨捆绑式胰胃吻合术(BPG)患者术后生活质量。

方法

回顾性分析2013年5月至2015年8月在浙江大学医学院附属第二医院行BPG的20例患者临床资料。其中男11例,女9例;年龄23~79岁,中位年龄57岁。17例行胰十二指肠切除术,3例行胰腺中段切除术。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。采用汉化的健康调查量表(SF-36)对BPG患者术后健康相关生活质量进行随访调查。将BPG术患者术后6、12个月SF-36健康调查数据分别和健康人群数据进行比较。两组SF-36评分数据比较采用t检验。

结果

BPG患者术后6个月时的生理职能、生活功能、情感职能评分分别为(44±43)、(71±22)、(43±42)分,明显低于健康人群的(81±34)、(83±18)、(84±32)分(t=-3.843,-2.480,-4.370;P<0.05)。BPG患者术后12个月时的生理职能、情感职能评分分别为(54±18)、(54±24)分,明显低于健康人群的(81±34)、(84±32)分(t=-2.438,-2.374;P<0.05);而总体健康、生理功能、躯体疼痛、活力、生活功能和精神健康评分与健康人群差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

BPG患者术后6个月时生理职能、生活功能和情感职能有一定的改变,术后12个月患者生活质量可趋于正常化,但生理职能和情感职能仍有一定影响,应加强心理方面宣教。

Objective

To investigate the postoperative quality of life of the patients after binding pancreaticogastrostomy (BPG).

Methods

Clinical data of 20 patients who underwent BPG in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between May 2013 and August 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 11 were males and 9 females, aged 23-79 years old with a median age of 57 years old. Seventeen cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 3 underwent middle segment pancreatectomy. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Postoperative health-related quality of life of BPG patients was assessed by Chinesized health survey scales (SF-36). The SF-36 health survey data of the patients at 6 and 12 months after BPG were analyzed and compared with the data of the heathy people using t test.

Results

The role-physical, social function and role-emotional scores of the patients at 6 months after BPG were respectively 44±43, 71±22 and 43±42, significantly lower than 81±34, 83±18 and 84±32 of the heathy people (t=-3.843, -2.480, -4.370; P<0.05). The role-physical and role-emotional scores of the patients at 12 months after BPG were respectively 54±18 and 54±24, significantly lower than 81±34 and 84±32 of the heathy people (t=-2.438, -2.374; P<0.05). There were no significant differences in general health, psychological function, body pain, vitality, vital function and mental health scores between the BPG patients and healthy people (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The role-physical, social function and role-emotional of the patients at 6 month after BPG have certain changes. The life quality tends to normalization at 12 month after BPG while the role-physical and role-emotional still have certain effects. Propaganda and education should be strengthened on the psychological aspect.

表1 SF-36健康调查量表各维度分数的意义
表2 BPG患者术后6、12个月与健康人群SF-36评分比较(分,±s
[1]
Wellner UF, Kulemann B, Lapshyn H, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage--incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1,000 pancreatic resections[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2014, 18(3):464-475.
[2]
Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, et al. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(3):518-523.
[3]
Pezzilli R, Falconi M, Zerbi A, et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for different diseases: a follow-up study[J]. Pancreas, 2011, 40(6):938-945.
[4]
彭淑牖,吴育连,彭承宏,等.捆绑式胰肠吻合术(附28例报告)[J].中华外科杂志,1997,35(3):158-159.
[5]
Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY, et al. Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(5):692-698.
[6]
彭淑牖,洪德飞,刘颖斌,等.捆绑式胰胃吻合术[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(2):139-142.
[7]
Peng SY, Wang JW, Hong DF, et al. Binding pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: from binding pancreaticojejunostomy to binding pancreaticogastrostomy[J]. Updates Surg, 2011, 63(2):69-74.
[8]
康鹏程,姜兴明,万明,等.捆绑式胰胃吻合术在中段胰腺切除术中的应用价值[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(11):921-924.
[9]
李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113.
[10]
Winter JW, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2006, 10(9):1199-1210.
[11]
Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M, et al Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 263(3):440-449.
[12]
Yang SH, Dou KF, Sharma N, et al. The methods of reconstruction of pancreatic digestive continuity after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. World J Surg, 2011, 35(10):2290-2297.
[13]
Pezzilli R, Falconi M, Zerbi A, et al. Different reconstruction techniques after pancreatoduodenectomy do not affect clinical and patient reported outcomes[J]. Adv Med Sci, 2014, 59(2):151-155.
[14]
Zhou Y, Yu J, Wu L, et al. Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on occurrences of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. Asian J Surg, 2015, 38(3):155-160.
[15]
Zhang X, Ma L, Gao X, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Surg Today, 2015, 45(5):585-954.
[16]
李江涛,于源泉.胰十二指肠切除术后胰漏的处理[J].肝胆外科杂志,2011,19(6): 412-414.
[17]
Ihnát P, Martínek L, Mitták M, et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic and open resection of colorectal cancer[J]. Dig Surg, 2014, 31(3):161-168.
[18]
Ali AS, Hayes MC, Birch B, et al. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) after cystectomy: comparison between orthotopic neobladder and ileal conduit diversion[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2015, 41(3):295-299.
[19]
Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation[J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2003, 57(4):259-263.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 冷建军, 朴成林, 司振铎. 胰十二指肠切除术联合小范围肝切除、血管切除重建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 384-384.
[3] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[4] 张超, 张珍, 马梁, 穆欢欢, 刘彩玲. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术术后C级胰瘘患者临床特征及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-678.
[5] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[6] 史成宇, 季晓琳, 田莉莹, 张来香. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中第14c/d组淋巴结清扫在胰头癌中的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 430-433.
[7] 刘欣茹, 杜鹃, 代健健, 辛秀娟, 高梨梨. SBAR沟通模式在急诊腹股沟疝手术患者中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 451-455.
[8] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[9] 马锦芳, 何正光, 郑劲平. 盐酸氨溴索雾化吸入治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病黏痰症患者的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 568-574.
[10] 陶银花, 张红杰, 王亚岚, 陈莲, 张珺. 间歇式气压治疗预防肺癌化疗下肢深静脉血栓的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 605-608.
[11] 林建琴, 孔令敏, 陆银凤, 陈勇, 金凤, 叶磊, 陈方梅. PERMA模式对肺癌患者治疗获益感及生活质量的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 634-638.
[12] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[13] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[14] 陈卫波, 朱玉文, 杨豪, 陆泽坤, 邬迪, 祖广晨, 张悦, 陈学敏. 一种改良胰肠吻合方式安全性及其在腹腔镜和开腹胰十二指肠切除术中应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 498-503.
[15] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
阅读次数
全文


摘要