切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (05) : 378 -383. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2017.05.010

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

快速康复外科理念在胆总管切开取石术围手术期应用疗效的Meta分析
廖启成1, 谢星1, 王小农1,(), 何晓1, 李红春2   
  1. 1. 341000 江西省赣州市,赣南医学院第一附属医院肝胆外科
    2. 518100 深圳市第三人民医院肝胆疾病研究重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-05 出版日期:2017-10-10
  • 通信作者: 王小农
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市肝胆疾病研究重点实验室项目(ZDSYS201504301534057); 赣南医学院科技创新项目(YC2016-X010)

Application efficacy of fast track surgery concept in perioperative period of choledocholithotomy: a Meta-analysis

Qicheng Liao1, Xing Xie1, Xiaonong Wang1,(), Xiao He1, Hongchun Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College, Ganzhou 341000, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Hepatobiliary Disease, the Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518100, China
  • Received:2017-07-05 Published:2017-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Xiaonong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Xiaonong, Email:
引用本文:

廖启成, 谢星, 王小农, 何晓, 李红春. 快速康复外科理念在胆总管切开取石术围手术期应用疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2017, 06(05): 378-383.

Qicheng Liao, Xing Xie, Xiaonong Wang, Xiao He, Hongchun Li. Application efficacy of fast track surgery concept in perioperative period of choledocholithotomy: a Meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 06(05): 378-383.

目的

探讨快速康复外科(FTS)理念在胆总管切开取石术围手术期应用的疗效。

方法

计算机检索2016年2月之前Pubmed、Cochrane Library数据库、万方数据库、维普数据库和中国知网(CNKI)公开发表的关于FTS理念在胆总管切开取石术围手术期中应用的相关文献。检索词:快速康复、加速康复、快通道外科、胆总管结石、胆总管探查、胆道手术、胆道外科、fast track surgery、FTS、enhanced recovery after surgery、ERAS等。FTS组为胆总管切开取石术围手术期采用FTS方法处理,对照组为围手术期采用传统方法处理。比较两组术后并发症发生率、首次肛门排气时间、住院费用和术后住院时间。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型进行Meta分析。

结果

共有10篇文献纳入研究,病例数1 204例。其中FTS组627例,对照组577例。Meta分析结果显示,与对照组相比,FTS组术后总并发症发生率明显降低[RR=0.49,95%CI(0.39,0.60),P<0.05];首次肛门排气时间明显缩短[SMD=-1.65,95%CI (-2.14,-1.17),P<0.05];住院费用明显降低[SMD=-1.08,95%CI(-1.28,-0.88),P<0.05];术后住院时间明显缩短[WMD=-2.94,95%CI(-3.24,-2.63),P<0.05]。各项研究中均无死亡病例。

结论

FTS理念应用于胆总管切开取石术围手术期可明显降低术后并发症发生率和住院费用,加速患者术后康复。

Objective

To investigate the application efficacy of fast track surgery (FTS) concept in the perioperative period of choledocholithotomy.

Methods

Relevant literatures about the application of FTS concept in the perioperative period of choledocholithotomy published before February 2016 were searched from PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Wanfang database, Chongqing Vip database and CNKI by computer. The searching keywords included fast recovery, accelerated recovery, fast track surgery, FTS, enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS, common bile duct stone, exploration of common bile duct, biliary tract operation, billiary tract surgery, etc. FTS method was used in the perioperative period of choledocholithotomy in the FTS group, while conventional method was used in the control group. The incidence of postoperative complications, the first anal exhaust time, hospitalization expense and postoperative length of hospital stay were compared between two groups. Fixed or random effect model was utilized for Meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 10 literatures, consisting of 1 204 cases, 627 in the FTS group and 577 in the control group, were included in this study. Meta-analysis revealed that compared with the control group, the incidence of total postoperative complications in the FTS group was significantly decreased [RR=0.49, 95%CI (0.39, 0.60), P<0.05], the first anal exhaust time was significantly shorter [SMD=-1.65, 95%CI(-2.14, -1.17), P<0.05], the hospitalization expense was significantly reduced [SMD=-1.08, 95%CI (-1.28, -0.88), P<0.05)], and the postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter [WMD =-2.94, 95%CI (-3.24, -2.63), P<0.05]. No patient died in either group.

Conclusions

Application of FTS concept in the perioperative period of choledocholithotomy can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and hospitalization expense, accelerate the postoperative recovery of the patients.

表1 纳入研究的文献报道病例基本特征
表2 FTS组和对照组术后并发症发生率比较
图1 FTS组和对照组首次肛门排气时间Meta分析森林图
图2 入选文献的病例术后并发症发生率发表偏倚分析漏斗图
[1]
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(2):259-284.
[2]
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(2): 285-305.
[3]
Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations[J]. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(10):1209-1229.
[4]
江志伟,李宁.结直肠手术应用加速康复外科中国专家共识(2015版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015(8):785-787.
[5]
中国研究型医院学会肝胆胰外科专业委员会. 肝胆胰外科术后加速康复专家共识(2015版)[J].中华消化外科杂志,2016,15(1):1-6.
[6]
Chen S, Zou Z, Chen F, et al. A meta-analysis of fast track surgery for patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2015, 97(1):3-10.
[7]
Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011(2):CD007635.
[8]
Wu SJ, Xiong XZ, Lu J, et al. Fast-track programs for liver surgery: a meta-analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 19(9):1640-1652.
[9]
马先仕,王雄彪,肖绪鹏,等.快速康复外科在腹腔镜下胆总管结石手术的临床应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2015,32(2):425-426.
[10]
陈晓鹏,王东,崔巍,等.加速康复外科联合腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的前瞻性研究[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(1):47-51.
[11]
翟飞,张绍义,何嘉宾.快速康复外科与传统外科在腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中的应用比较[J].西部医学,2015,27(7):1042-1045.
[12]
王丽,安旭娜,赵伟.不留置胃管早期进食在胆总管结石手术中的应用研究[J].河北医药,2013,35(2):313-314.
[13]
赵志坚,唐才喜,冯斌,等.快速康复外科理念指导下腹腔镜胆道探查术的前瞻性随机对照临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2013,19(6):575-580.
[14]
李巧平,任海燕,吕晓兰.快速康复外科在腹腔镜胆道围手术期护理中的应用[J].护理与康复,2013,12(12):1142-1143.
[15]
赵军,李玉民.快速康复外科在胆道外科中应用的安全性及有效性[J].河北医学,2012,18(8):1119-1121.
[16]
鲍恩武,龚仁华,孙登群,等.快速康复外科理念在胆总管探查围手术期应用[J].肝胆外科杂志,2012,20(4):259-261.
[17]
谭黄业,樊献军,肖咏梅,等.快速康复外科在腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术中的应用[J].中国普通外科杂志,2011,20(2):146-149.
[18]
王刚,孙备,姜洪池,等.快速康复外科在胆道外科中应用的初探[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2009,15(1): 31-35.
[19]
李奇男,张玉怀,耿婕.快速康复外科在胆道结石患者围手术期护理中安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2015,31(10):1660-1664.
[20]
Podda M, Polignano FM, Luhmann A, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(3):845-861.
[1] 蚁淳, 袁冬生, 熊学军. 系统免疫炎症指数与骨密度降低和骨质疏松的关联[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 609-617.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[7] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[10] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[11] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[12] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[13] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[14] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[15] 周倩妹, 王宪娥, 徐筱, 老慧琳, 赵欣悦, 胡菁颖. 多元化系统护理对老年人群牙周健康指标影响的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 500-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?