切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 119 -122. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.02.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜联合胆道镜再次胆总管探查在肝内外胆管结石患者中的应用价值
李敏1, 陶颖1, 宋陆军1,()   
  1. 1. 200032 上海,复旦大学附属中山医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-12 出版日期:2018-04-10
  • 通信作者: 宋陆军
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81600630)

Application value of common bile duct re-exploration under laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in patients with intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stone

Min Li1, Ying Tao1, Lujun Song1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan Univesity, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2018-01-12 Published:2018-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Lujun Song
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Song Lujun, Email:
引用本文:

李敏, 陶颖, 宋陆军. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜再次胆总管探查在肝内外胆管结石患者中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(02): 119-122.

Min Li, Ying Tao, Lujun Song. Application value of common bile duct re-exploration under laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in patients with intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stone[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(02): 119-122.

目的

探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜再次胆总管探查在肝内外胆管结石患者中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2016年5月复旦大学附属中山医院收治的79例既往有胆道手术史的肝内外胆管结石患者临床资料。按照治疗方法将患者分成腹腔镜联合胆道镜组(双镜联合组)和开腹组。其中双镜联合组43例,男18例,女25例;平均年龄(63±14)岁。开腹组36例,男19例,女17例;年龄(63±12)岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。两组手术时间、住院费用比较采用t检验,术中出血量、术后胃肠道恢复时间、术后住院时间比较采用Z检验,并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

双镜联合组患者手术时间为(5.2±1.8)h,明显长于开腹组的(2.4±1.3)h(t=7.371,P<0.05)。双镜联合组的术中出血量中位数为30(5~200)ml,与开腹组的40(10~400)ml比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.270,P>0.05)。双镜联合组患者的术后胃肠道恢复时间、术后住院时间分别为3(1~9)、8(3~18)d,开腹组相应为3(1~29)、9(2~97)d,差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.475,-2.023;P>0.05)。双镜联合组患者的住院费用3.4 (0.7~9.6)万元,明显高于开腹组的2.8(1.4~9.6)万元(Z=2.495,P<0.05)。双镜联合组术后结石残余率、胆漏发生率、切口感染发生率分别为12%(5/43)、0、0,开腹组相应为19%(7/36)、6%(2/36)、3%(1/36),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜联合胆道镜双镜治疗既往有腹部胆道手术史的肝内外胆管结石是一种安全、有效的手术方式。

Objective

To explore the application value of common bile duct re-exploration under laparoscope combined with choledochoscope in patients with intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stone.

Methods

Clinical data of 79 patients with intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stone who had previous operative history of biliary tract in Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan Univesity between June 2014 and May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, the patients were divided into the laparoscope combined with choledochoscope group (two-scope group) and laparotomy group. There were 43 cases in two-scope group, including 18 males and 25 females with the average age of (63±14) years. There were 36 cases in laparotomy group, including 19 males and 17 females with the age of (63±12) years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. The operation time and hospitalization expenses of two groups were compared by t test. The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal tract were compared by Z test. The incidence of complications was compared by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability method.

Results

The operation time of patients in two-scope group was (5.2±1.8) h, significantly longer than (2.4±1.3) h of the laparotomy group (t=7.371, P<0.05). The median of intraoperative blood loss in two-scope group was 30(5-200) ml and was 40(10-400) ml in laparotomy group, and no significant difference was observed (Z=-0.270, P>0.05). The postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal tract and postoperative hospitalization time in two-scope group was 3(1-9) and 8(3-18) d respectively, and was 3(1-29) and 9(2-97) d in laparotomy group, and no significant difference was observed (Z=-1.475, -2.023; P>0.05). The hospitalization expenses of the two-scope group was 34(7-96) thousand yuan, significantly more than 28(14-96) thousand yuan of the laparotomy group (Z=2.495, P<0.05). The postoperative residual rate of stone, incidence of bile leakage and incision infection of the two-scope group was respectively 12%(5/43), 0 and 0, and was 19%(7/36), 6%(2/36) and 3%(1/36) in laparotomy group, and no significant difference was observed (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Laparoscope combined with choledochoscope is a safe and effective operation for intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stone with previous operative history of biliary tract.

[1]
Chan DS, Jain PA, Khalifa A, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Br J Surg, 2014, 101(11):1448-1452.
[2]
Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(3):875-885.
[3]
Lee HM, Min SK, Lee HK. Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis: 15-year experience from a single center[J]. Ann Surg Treat Res, 2014, 86(1):1-6.
[4]
黄品谚,丁佑铭,汪斌,等.腹腔镜胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石两种术式的疗效比较[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(5):369-371.
[5]
吴鸣宇,张志强,顾炜,等.腹腔镜下胆总管切开取石术的安全性评价及疗效[J].肝胆外科杂志,2014,22(5):338-341.
[6]
刘泽良,朱建方,何伟.腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查取石一期缝合术51例报告[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2015,27(3):236-238.
[7]
Choi HR, Kim JD, Choi DL. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: a feasible option for choledocholithiasis in patients with previous gastrectomy[J]. J Minimal Invas Surg, 2016, 19(4):130-134.
[8]
潘成文,吴育连.腹腔镜与开腹胆总管取石一期缝合的临床比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(6):518-521.
[9]
于安星,吴承先,刘哲.腹腔镜胆总管切开一期缝合术后胆漏的原因及处理方法[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2016,22(7):490-492.
[10]
Yun KW, Ahn YJ, Lee HW, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal operations[J]. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2012, 16(4):154-159.
[11]
Bouasker I, El Ouaer MA, Smaali I, et al. Laparascopic cholecystectomy on a previously operated abdomen[J]. Tunis Med, 2010, 88(2):88-91.
[12]
Wang Y, Bo X, Wang Y, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for choledocholithiasis concomitant with calculus of the left intrahepatic duct or abdominal adhesions[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(11):4780-4789.
[13]
Aawsaj Y, Light D, Horgan L. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: 15-year experience in a district general hospital[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 30(6):2563-2566.
[14]
王宾,刘振杰,吕云霄,等.术前与术中内镜下括约肌切开术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的荟萃分析[J].中华医学杂志,2015,95(18):1425-1429.
[15]
李媛媛,李国华,陈幼祥,等.高龄患者经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的风险评价[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2017,34(4):274-276.
[16]
白晓庆,黄华,张映媛,等.经内镜逆行性胰胆管造影术后并发症的防治进展[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2017,26(7):837-840.
[17]
Goong HJ, Moon JH, Lee YN, et al. The role of endoscopic biliary drainage without sphincterotomy in gallstone patients with cholangitis and suspected common bile duct stones not detected by cholangiogram or intraductal ultrasonography[J]. Gut Liver, 2017, 11(3):434-439.
[18]
Guda NM, Reddy DN, Kumar A. Complications of ERCP[J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2014, 33(1):1-9.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[11] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[12] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要