切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 396 -401. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.05.012

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

胆管癌相关多原发癌临床特点及预后分析
熊永福1, 杨刚1, 李强1, 徐健1, 李敬东1,()   
  1. 1. 637000 四川省南充市,川北医学院附属医院肝胆外科 川北医学院肝胆胰肠研究所
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-20 出版日期:2018-10-10
  • 通信作者: 李敬东
  • 基金资助:
    四川省教育厅项目(16TD0025)

Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of cholangiocarcinoma-related multiple primary malignancies

Yongfu Xiong1, Gang Yang1, Qiang Li1, Jian Xu1, Jingdong Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Northern Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China
  • Received:2018-06-20 Published:2018-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Jingdong Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Jingdong, Email:
引用本文:

熊永福, 杨刚, 李强, 徐健, 李敬东. 胆管癌相关多原发癌临床特点及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(05): 396-401.

Yongfu Xiong, Gang Yang, Qiang Li, Jian Xu, Jingdong Li. Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of cholangiocarcinoma-related multiple primary malignancies[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(05): 396-401.

目的

探讨胆管癌相关多原发癌(CMPMs)患者临床病理特点、癌灶部位、肿瘤发生间隔时间及其与发病风险和预后的关系。

方法

收集美国国立癌症研究所监测、流行病学和结果数据库(SEER)1973年至2014年间确诊为胆管癌的38 550例患者临床病理及随访资料。计算CMPMs标准化发病率(SIR)及其95%CI。采用SIR比较首发胆管癌后不同肿瘤的发病率,及其在不同年龄段及不同诊断时间间隔的发病率。比较CMPMs发病间隔时间对总体生存的影响。

结果

单发胆管癌38 082例,CMPMs 468例,发病率1.2%。胆管癌后发生小肠、胰腺、肝及胆道肿瘤的风险较正常人群明显增加(SIR=5.97,1.58,2.28;95%CI:3.09~10.44,1.01~2.35,1.49~3.37;P<0.05)。首发年龄在30~49岁及50~59岁的患者发生其他肿瘤的风险明显高于正常人群(SIR=4.00,1.67;95%CI: 2.51~6.06,1.25~3.19;P<0.05)。胆管癌术后5~10年患者发生其他肿瘤的风险明显高于正常人群(SIR=1.30;95%CI:1.08~1.55;P<0.05)。胆管癌患者生存期随CMPMs发生的间隔时间增加而延长,尤其是胆管癌术后5年发生多原发癌总体生存状况具有明显优势。

结论

CMPMs检出率低,易漏诊。对在30~59岁确诊,术后5年以上的胆管癌患者,加强对消化道肿瘤的随访可能有助于识别CMPMs。患者生存期随多原发癌发生的间隔时间增加而延长。

Objective

To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, location of tumors, interval time of new-onset tumor, and their relationship with the onset risk and prognosis of patients with cholangiocarcinoma-related multiple primary malignancies (CMPMs).

Methods

Clinicopathological and follow-up data of 38 550 patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database of National Cancer Institute between 1973 and 2014 were collected. The standardized incidence rate (SIR) of CMPMs and the 95%CI were calculated. The incidence of different tumors, different age and different diagnostic interval time after first-onset cholangiocarcinoma were compared with SIR. The impact of different interval time of CMPMs upon the overall survival was compared.

Results

A total of 38 082 cases were diagnosed with single cholangiocarcinoma and 468 cases were diagnosed with CMPMs, with a incidence of 1.2%. The onset risk of small intestinal, pancreas, liver, and biliary tract tumors after cholangiocarcinoma was significantly higher than that in normal population (SIR=5.97, 1.58, 2.28; 95%CI: 3.09-10.44, 1.01-2.35, 1.49-3.37; P<0.05). Patients aged 30-49 and 50-59 years had a higher risk of developing other tumors, compared with the normal population (SIR=4.00, 1.67; 95%CI: 2.51-6.06, 1.25-3.19; P<0.05). At 5-10 years after surgery, the risk of other tumors in patients with cholangiocarcinoma was significantly higher than that of normal population (SIR=1.30; 95%CI: 1.08-1.55; P<0.05). The survival time of patients with cholangiocarcinoma was prolonged along with the increase of interval time of onsets of CMPMs. In particular, the overall survival of patients with CMPMs at postoperative 5 years was significantly better.

Conclusions

The diagnostic rate of CMPMs is low and the risk of missed diagnosis is high. For patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma between the age of 30-59 years and have underwent surgery for over 5 years, enhance the follow-up of gastrointestinal tumors may contribute to identifying CMPMs. The survival time is prolonged along with the increase of interval time of new-onset CMPMs.

图1 胆管癌相关多原发癌不同部位及时段标准化发病率
表1 不同年龄段及时间间隔的CMPMs标准化发病率
图2 不同间隔时间多原发癌Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
[1]
Smith-Gagen J, Goodwin GA 3rd, Tay J. Multiple primary tumors following stage II and III rectal cancer in patients receiving radiotherapy, 1998-2010[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2014, 140(6): 949-955.
[2]
Han SS, Rivera GA, Tammemägi MC, et al. Risk stratification for second primary lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(25):2893-2899.
[3]
Chen T, Kharazmi E, Lou J, et al. Risk of second primary cancers after malignant mesothelioma and vice versa[J]. Cancer Lett, 2016, 379(1):94-99.
[4]
Chaturvedi AK, Kleinerman RA, Hildesheim A, et al. Second cancers after squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(6):967-973.
[5]
Morton LM, Onel K, Curtis RE, et al. The rising incidence of second cancers: patterns of occurrence and identification of risk factors for children and adults[J]. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2014:e57-67.
[6]
赵洁敏,吴昌平.多原发癌症的研究进展[J].癌症进展,2016,14(12):1195-1198.
[7]
朱莉菲,薛鹏,王理伟.65例多原发癌的临床回顾性研究[J].复旦学报(医学版),2010, 37(5):591-593.
[8]
Oliveira IS, Kilcoyne A, Everett JM, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: classification, diagnosis, staging, imaging features, and management[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2017, 42(6):1637-1649.
[9]
Banales JM, Cardinale V, Carpino G, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA)[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 13(5):261-280.
[10]
Altekruse SF, Rosenfeld GE, Carrick DM, et al. SEER cancer registry biospecimen research: yesterday and tomorrow[J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2014, 23(12):2681-2687.
[11]
Hildebrand P, Humke J, Oevermann E, et al. Influence of second or multiple tumours on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Acta Chir Iugosl, 2012, 59(1):31-38.
[12]
房龙.《2016年欧洲肿瘤内科学会胆管癌诊断、治疗与随访临床实践指南》摘译[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2017, 33(2):238-243.
[13]
Ito F, Cho CS, Rikkers LF, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: current management[J]. Ann Surg, 2009, 250(2):210-218.
[14]
Keegan THM, Bleyer A, Rosenberg AS, et al. Second primary malignant neoplasms and survival in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2017, 3(11):1554-1557.
[15]
孙俊杰,李双庆.多原发癌病因及发病机制的探索[J].中国全科医学,2017, 20(9):1136-1141.
[16]
Surapaneni R, Singh P, Rajagopalan K, et al. Stage I lung cancer survivorship: risk of second malignancies and need for individualized care plan[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2012, 7(8):1252-1256.
[17]
Ringland CL, Arkenau HT, O'connell DL, et al. Second primary colorectal cancers (SPCRCs): experiences from a large Australian Cancer Registry[J]. Ann Oncol, 2010, 21(1):92-97.
[18]
中国研究型医院学会消化道肿瘤专业委员会,中国医师协会外科医师分会多学科综合治疗专业委员会.肝脏及胆道恶性肿瘤多学科综合治疗协作组诊疗模式专家共识[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2017, 11(1):1-3.
[19]
Kim JH, Lee YG, Lee J, et al. A case of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma with sarcomatous transformation and second primary colon cancer[J]. Korean J Hepatol, 2004, 10(2):142-147.
[20]
Inaba K, Suzuki S, Sakaguchi T, et al. Double primary liver cancer (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma) in a patient with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2007, 14(2):204-209.
[21]
Long H, Wang M, Gong J, et al. Occurrence of second primary cancer after curative resection of cholangiocarcinoma: a report of5 cases[J]. Int Surg J, 2017, 4(4):1455-1457.
[1] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[2] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[3] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[4] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[5] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[6] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[7] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[8] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[9] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[10] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[11] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[12] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[13] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要