切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 402 -405. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2018.05.013

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

高龄患者胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效分析
吴祥1, 刘开睿2, 曾柏强3, 冉义洪3, 马明磊3, 张红卫3,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院肝胆外科;510120 广州,广东省中医院肝胆胰外科
    2. 大学城分院腹部外科
    3. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-16 出版日期:2018-10-10
  • 通信作者: 张红卫
  • 基金资助:
    北京市希思科临床肿瘤学研究基金(Y-2009-017)

Perioperative efficacy of pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients

Xiang Wu1, Kairui Liu2, Baiqiang Zeng3, Yihong Ran3, Minglei Ma3, Hongwei Zhang3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
    2. Department of Abdominal Surgery, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
    3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2018-05-16 Published:2018-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Hongwei Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Hongwei, Email:
引用本文:

吴祥, 刘开睿, 曾柏强, 冉义洪, 马明磊, 张红卫. 高龄患者胰十二指肠切除术围手术期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 07(05): 402-405.

Xiang Wu, Kairui Liu, Baiqiang Zeng, Yihong Ran, Minglei Ma, Hongwei Zhang. Perioperative efficacy of pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 07(05): 402-405.

目的

探讨高龄患者胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的围手术期安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析1994年1月至2014年12月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院行PD的593例患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理规定。根据患者的年龄分为高龄组(年龄≥70岁)与非高龄组(年龄<70岁)。其中高龄组97例,男59例,女38例;非高龄组496例,男300例,女196例。两组患者围手术期指标比较采用秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

高龄组中位手术时间、术中出血量分别为333(187~620)min、400(50~2 500)ml,非高龄组相应为340(180~920) min、400 (50~18 000)ml,差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.249,-0.046;P>0.05)。高龄组围手术期死亡率、总并发症发生率、二次手术率分别为11.3%、45.4%、10.3%,非高龄组相应为6.0%、40.7%、11.1%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.530,0.718,0.051;P>0.05)。高龄组术后手术操作相关并发症发生率35.1%,非高龄组37.9%,差异无统计学意义(χ2= 0.282,P>0.05);而术后非手术操作相关并发症发生率为18.6%,明显高于非高龄组的9.1%(χ2= 7.686,P<0.05)。

结论

高龄患者PD相较于非高龄患者在技术方面是同样安全的,但非手术操作相关并发症发生率相对较高,术前针对高龄患者更加全面、细致的全身评估十分必要。

Objective

To evaluate the perioperative safety and clinical efficacy of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in elderly patients.

Methods

Clinical data of 593 patients undergoing PD in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 1994 to December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to the age, all patients were divided into the elderly group (age≥70 years,n=97, 59 males and 38 females) and non-elderly group (age<70 years, n=496, 300 males and 196 females). The perioperative parameters were compared between two groups using rank sum test. The rates were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

Results

In elderly group, the median length of operative time was 333 (187-620) min and the intraoperative blood loss was 400 (50-2 500) ml, and was respectively 340 (180-920) min, 400 (50-18 000) ml in non-elderly group, where no significant difference was observed (Z=-1.249, -0.046; P>0.05). The perioperative mortality, overall incidence of complications and reoperation rate in elderly group were 11.3%, 45.4% and 10.3% , and were 6.0%, 40.7% and 11.1% respectively in non-elderly group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=3.530, 0.718, 0.051; P>0.05). The incidence of operation-related complications was 35.1% in elderly group, and was 37.9% in non-elderly group, where no significant difference was observed (χ2=0.282, P>0.05). The incidence of non-operation-related complications was 18.6% in elderly group, significantly higher than 9.1% in non-elderly group (χ2=7.686, P<0.05).

Conclusions

For elderly patients, PD is technically safe as non-elderly patients. However, the incidence of non-operation-related complications is higher in elderly patients comparatively. A more comprehensive and detailed physical assessment is necessary before operation for the elderly patients.

表1 高龄组与非高龄组患者PD术后手术操作相关并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表2 高龄组与非高龄患者PD术后非手术操作相关并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality[J]. Brit J Surg, 2012, 99(3):404-410.
[2]
Kamisawa T, Wood LD, Itoi T, et al. Pancreatic cancer[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10039):73-85.
[3]
Riess H. Pancreatic cancer: moving forward, step by step[J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 2(5):315-316.
[4]
Shinkawa H, Takemura S, Kiyota S, et al. Long-term outcome of surgical treatment for ampullary carcinoma[J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2012, 59(116):1010-1012.
[5]
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(5):761-768.
[6]
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition[J]. Surgery, 2005, 138(1):8-13.
[7]
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(1):20-25.
[8]
Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies[J]. J Am Coll Surgeons, 2015, 220(4): 530-536.
[9]
Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2013, 14(7): 655-662.
[10]
Urbonas K, Gulbinas A, Smailyte G, et al. Factors influencing survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma depend on patients' age[J]. Dig Surg, 2015, 32(1):60-67.
[11]
Lee MK, Dinorcia J, Reavey PL, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in patients aged 80 years and older[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2010, 14(11): 1838-1846.
[12]
Yeh CC, Jeng YM, Ho CM, et al. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer is not affected by age[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34(12):2945-2952.
[13]
汤建军,江勇,严国度,等.老年患者行胰十二指肠切除术临床特征和并发症分析[J].肝胆外科杂志,2017, 25(4):259-261.
[14]
王在国,何润沛,叶振伟,等.80岁以上高龄患者胰十二指肠切除术体会[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2014, 6(1):67-69.
[15]
Sukharamwala P, Thoens J, Szuchmacher M, et al. Advanced age is a risk factor for post-operative complications and mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. HPB, 2012, 14(10):649-657.
[16]
Sulpice L, Rayar M, D'Halluin PN, et al. Impact of age over 75 years on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Surg Res, 2012, 178(1):181-187.
[17]
Faraj W, Alameddine R, Mukherji D, et al. Postoperative outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy: how should age affect clinical practice?[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2013(11):131.
[18]
Oliveira-Cunha M, Malde DJ, Aldouri A, et al. Results of pancreatic surgery in the elderly: is age a barrier?[J]. HPB, 2013, 15(1):24-30.
[19]
吕胜,周蒙滔.胰十二指肠切除术后胃排空延迟发生及严重程度的危险因素分析[J].中国现代医生,2014, 52(6): 14-17.
[20]
陶敏洁.胰十二指肠切除术后并发症相关因素及防控策略分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2014, 24(6): 107-110.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[9] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[10] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[11] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[12] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[13] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[14] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[15] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
阅读次数
全文


摘要