切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 301 -305. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2019.04.006

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术14例初步体会
王楚斯1, 陈署贤1, 钟跃思1, 汤照峰1, 潘卫东1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院肝胆外科 胆胰外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-02 出版日期:2019-08-10
  • 通信作者: 潘卫东
  • 基金资助:
    中山大学附属第三医院临床研究计划资助(YHJH201910); 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2016D01C016)

Preliminary experience of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in 14 cases

Chusi Wang1, Shuxian Chen1, Yuesi Zhong1, Zhaofeng Tang1, Weidong Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Biliary Pancreatic Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2019-04-02 Published:2019-08-10
  • Corresponding author: Weidong Pan
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pan Weidong, Email:
引用本文:

王楚斯, 陈署贤, 钟跃思, 汤照峰, 潘卫东. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术14例初步体会[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 08(04): 301-305.

Chusi Wang, Shuxian Chen, Yuesi Zhong, Zhaofeng Tang, Weidong Pan. Preliminary experience of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in 14 cases[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 08(04): 301-305.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)的可行性及安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年2月至2019年1月在中山大学附属第三医院行LPD的14例患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学要求。其中男6例,女8例;年龄49~72岁,中位年龄为63岁;术前影像学检查明确为壶腹部周围肿瘤,平均直径(2.7±0.7)cm。分析术中及术后并发症发生情况。

结果

12例接受标准完全LPD,1例LPD联合左半肝切除术,1例因胰腺萎缩未能找到胰管而中转开腹行胰胃吻合。手术时间(547±66)min,术中出血量(145±58)ml,术后住院时间(14±7)d。术后发生胰瘘2例,腹腔出血、胃肠道出血、肠梗阻各1例。术后病理检查结果显示,胆总管下段癌6例,壶腹部周围癌5例,胰腺钩突癌2例,胰腺钩突黏液性囊腺瘤1例。

结论

LPD具有创伤小、术后恢复快等优点。LPD学习曲线较长,在开展LPD初期宜选择病灶较小的壶腹部周围肿瘤病例。具备一定腹腔镜手术技术和经验的术者开展LPD是安全、可行的。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD).

Methods

Clinical data of 14 patients undergoing LPD in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from February 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 6 patients were male and 8 female, aged 49-72 years with a median age of 63 years. Peri-ampullar tumors were confirmed by preoperative imaging examination, with an average diameter of (2.7±0.7) cm. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

12 patients underwent standard total LPD, 1 patient received LPD combined with left hemihepatectomy, and 1 patient was converted to laparotomy for pancreaticogastrostomy for the pancreatic duct could not be found due to atrophy. The operation time was (547±66) min. The intraoperative blood loss was (145±58) ml. The length of postoperative hospital stay was (14±7) d. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 2 cases, abdominal hemorrhage in 1, gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 1 and intestinal obstruction in 1, respectively. Postoperative pathological examination indicated that 6 cases were with lower common bile duct carcinoma, 5 cases with peri-ampullary carcinoma, 2 cases with pancreatic uncinate process carcinoma and 1 case with pancreatic uncinate process mucinous cystadenoma, respectively.

Conclusions

LPD has the advantages of small trauma and rapid recovery after operation. The learning curve of LPD is relatively long. In the early stage of performing LPD, it is suitable to select patients with small peri-ampullary tumors. It is safe and feasible to perform LPD by the operators with laparoscopic technique and experience.

[1]
Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 1994, 8(5):408-410.
[2]
金巍巍,徐晓武,牟一平,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术66例初步经验总结[J].中华外科杂志,2016, 54(2):84-87.
[3]
厉学民,俞世安,郑樟栋.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术十例[J].中华普通外科杂志,2016, 31(12):1051-1052.
[4]
黄强,杨骥,邵成颂,等.全腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术20例分析[J].腹部外科,2017, 30(4):302-306.
[5]
Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, et al. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after[J]. Surgery, 2017, 161(3):584-591.
[6]
Palanivelu C, Jani K, Senthilnathan P, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2007, 205(2):222-230.
[7]
Tran TB, Dua MM, Worhunsky DJ, et al. The first decade of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: costs and outcomes using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(5):1778-1783.
[8]
Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang CE, et al. Early national experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparison of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy from the National Cancer Data Base[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2015, 221(1):175-184.
[9]
Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, et al. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample[J]. Surgery, 2014, 156(3):538-547.
[10]
Kim SC, Song KB, Jung YS, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes for 100 consecutive cases of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: improvement with surgical experience[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(1):95-103.
[11]
Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?[J]. Ann Surg, 2014, 260(4):633-638.
[12]
Senthilnathan P, Srivatsan Gurumurthy S, Gul SI, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary cancer-experience of 130 cases from a tertiary-care center in South India[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(4):295-300.
[13]
Song KB, Kim SC, Hwang DW, et al. Matched case-control analysis comparing laparoscopic and open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary tumors[J]. Ann Surg, 2015, 262(1):146-155.
[14]
De Rooij T, Lu MZ, Steen MW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative cohort and registry studies[J]. Ann Surg, 2016, 264(2):257-267.
[15]
王文斌,闫长青,吕海涛,等.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2017, 23(2):110-113.
[16]
余杰,刘建生,郭建曻,等.九例腹腔镜下胰十二指肠切除术的临床疗效分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2017, 40(8):707-710.
[17]
洪德飞,刘亚辉,张宇华,等.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术80例疗效分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016, 36(8):885-888.
[18]
赵玉沛.胰十二指肠切除术现状与展望[J].中国实用外科杂志,2016, 36(8):817-820.
[19]
蔡云强,彭兵.浅谈如何安全度过腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018, 23(5):326-328.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[7] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[12] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[13] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[14] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[15] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
阅读次数
全文


摘要