切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 269 -273. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.03.015

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

三种不同入路超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在肝癌切除术中镇痛效果比较
陈佳婷1, 谭雷2, 杨小立1, 黄群1, 伍堂洪1, 陈杰桓2,()   
  1. 1. 523000 广东省东莞市第五人民医院麻醉科
    2. 523000 广东省东莞市第五人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-07 出版日期:2020-06-10
  • 通信作者: 陈杰桓
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81702375); 东莞市社会科技发展一般项目(201650715001251)

Comparison of analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block by three different approaches in liver cancer resection

Jiating Chen1, Lei Tan2, Xiaoli Yang1, Qun Huang1, Tanghong Wu1, Jiehuan Chen2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Fifth People's Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan 523000, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, the Fifth People's Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan 523000, China
  • Received:2020-01-07 Published:2020-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jiehuan Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Jiehuan, Email:
引用本文:

陈佳婷, 谭雷, 杨小立, 黄群, 伍堂洪, 陈杰桓. 三种不同入路超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在肝癌切除术中镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 269-273.

Jiating Chen, Lei Tan, Xiaoli Yang, Qun Huang, Tanghong Wu, Jiehuan Chen. Comparison of analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block by three different approaches in liver cancer resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(03): 269-273.

目的

比较三种不同入路超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)在开腹肝癌切除术中的镇痛效果和安全性。

方法

本前瞻性研究对象为2014年6月至2019年6月在东莞市第五人民医院行开腹肝癌切除术的90例患者。其中男57例,女33例;年龄为45~70岁,中位年龄51岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。患者均在局部麻醉下行超声引导TAPB,根据入路方式将入选患者按照随机数字表法分为腋中线入路法组、肋缘下入路法组和侧方入路法组,每组各30例。观察3组阻滞有效率、阻滞起效时间和持续时间、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)等。3组阻滞持续时间、VAS比较采用单因素方差分析,阻滞有效率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

肋缘下入路法组阻滞T6、T7、T8节段的有效率分别为93%(55/60)、100%(60/60)、100%(60/60),有效率最高(P<0.05);阻滞持续时间为(10.9±1.3)h,时间最长(F=11.348,P<0.05);而术后1、4、8 h的VAS评分分别为(1.08±0.37)、(1.18±0.48)、(1.81±0.27)分,分值亦最低(F=64.153,31.477,3.617;P<0.05)。腋中线入路法组和侧方入路法组发生腹壁血肿各1例,而肋缘下入路法组无发生TAPB相关并发症。

结论

肝癌切除术中应用超声引导TAPB安全、镇痛效果好,其中肋缘下入路法阻滞效果明显优于腋中线入路法和侧方入路法。

Objective

To compare the analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) by using three different approaches in open liver cancer resection.

Methods

In this prospective study, 90 liver cancer patients who underwent open liver cancer resection in the Fifth People's Hospital of Dongguan from June 2014 to June 2019 were recruited. Among them, 57 patients were male and 33 female, aged 45-70 years old with a median age of 51 years old. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients received ultrasound-guided TAPB under local anesthesia. According to different approach, all patients were divided into the axillary midline approach, subcostal approach and lateral approach groups by random number table method. The effective block rate, onset time and duration of block, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of postoperative pain were observed in three groups. The duration of block and VAS score among three groups were statistically compared by one-way analysis of variance, and the effective block rate was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

In the subcostal approach group, the effective block rates of T6, T7 and T8 segments were 93%(55/60), 100%(60/60) and 100% (60/60), which were the highest among three groups (P<0.05); the duration of block was (10.9±1.3) h, which was with the longest duration among three groups (F=11.348, P<0.05); the VAS scores at postoperative 1, 4 and 8 h were 1.08±0.37, 1.18±0.48 and 1.81±0.27, which were the lowest scores among three groups (F=64.153, 31.477, 3.617, P<0.05). Abdominal wall hematoma occurred in 1 case in the axillary midline approach group and 1 case in the lateral approach group, whereas no TAPB-related complications were noted in the subcostal approach group.

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided TAPB is safe and effective, and yields high blocking effect in liver cancer resection. The blocking effect of costal approach is significantly better compared with those of axillary midline and lateral approaches.

表1 三组肝癌切除患者一般情况比较
表2 三组肝癌切除患者阻滞起效时间、持续时间和腹壁肌肉松弛程度比较(±s
表3 三组肝癌切除患者阻滞范围比较(例)
表4 三组肝癌切除患者术后VAS疼痛评分比较(分,)
[1]
王卉,陈春.腹横肌平面阻滞的研究进展[J].国际麻醉学于复苏杂志,2019, 40(3):247-250.
[2]
易红,何睿,周大春.不同入路腹横肌平面阻滞的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2016, 32(5):510-514.
[3]
Lim S, Carabini LM, Kim RB, et al. Evaluation of AmericanSociety of Anesthesiologists classification as 30-day morbidity predictor after single-level elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Spine J, 2017, 17(3):313-320.
[4]
李向南,李建立,容俊芳.腹横肌平面阻滞在临床麻醉中的研究进展[J].河北医药,2018, 40(18):2842-2846.
[5]
黄海明,杨雪莹,罗建伟,等.肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞在开腹肝癌切除术中应用的效果评价[J]. 中山大学学报(医学版),2019(4): 585-591.
[6]
万赤丹,王国斌.原发性肝癌治疗进展[J].腹部外科,2019, 32(1):1-5.
[7]
罗慧,张献玲,陈芳,等.右美托咪啶麻醉诱导加速肝细胞癌切除术后麻醉恢复[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2017, 6(5):405-409.
[8]
周益舟,赵丽,李玉艳,等.多模式镇痛在肝胆外科的应用[J].中国药业,2019,28(16):96-100.
[9]
洪玉,刘嘉羿,彭书崚,等.腹横肌平面阻滞在达芬奇机器人肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 7(4):315-318.
[10]
Rahiri J, Tuhoe J, Svirskis D, et al. Systematic review of the systemic concentrations of local anaesthetic after transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2017, 118(4):517-526.
[11]
Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle[J]. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(10):1024-1026.
[12]
Bryskin RB, Londergan B, Wheatley R, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block versus caudal epidural for lower abdominal surgery in children: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2015, 121(2):471-478.
[13]
Tsai HC, Yoshida T, Chuang TY, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2017: 8284363.
[14]
Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010, 35(5):436-441.
[15]
袁帅,崔敬禄,熊东林,等.腹横肌平面阻滞药物扩散范围及治疗腹壁痛的效果[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2018, 24(10):790-792.
[16]
Parras T, Blanco R. Randomised trial comparing the transversus abdominis plane block posterior approach or quadratus lumborum block type I with femoral block for postoperative analgesia in femoral neck fracture, both ultrasound-guided[J]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, 2016, 63(3):141-148.
[17]
Hebbard PD, Barrington MJ, Vasey C. Ultrasound-guided continuous oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane blockade: description of anatomy and clinical technique[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010, 35(5):436-441.
[18]
Guo JG, Li HL, Pei QQ, et al. The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block with Mercedes incision[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2018, 18(1): 36.
[19]
Faiz SHR, Alebouyeh MR, Derakhshan P, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block and lateral transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial study[J]. J Pain Res, 2017(11): 5-9.
[20]
王雪华,张慧玲,林楠,等.罗哌卡因联合苏芬太尼镇痛加速肝硬化门静脉高压症患者肝切除术后康复[J/CD].中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志,2017, 6(5):393-396.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[9] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[10] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[12] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[13] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[14] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[15] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
阅读次数
全文


摘要