切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (05) : 475 -478. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2020.05.018

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查一期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石
田朕安1, 张恒1, 段小辉1, 田秉璋1, 杨建辉1, 张鸿渐1, 毛先海1,()   
  1. 1. 410005 长沙,湖南师范大学附属第一医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-19 出版日期:2020-10-10
  • 通信作者: 毛先海
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金(2018JJ3294,2019JJ80007); 湖南省科技计划重点研发项目(2015sk2050); 湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(16A127)

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration combined with primary suture for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis

Zhenan Tian1, Heng Zhang1, Xiaohui Duan1, Bingzhang Tian1, Jianhui Yang1, Hongjian Zhang1, Xianhai Mao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, China
  • Received:2020-05-19 Published:2020-10-10
  • Corresponding author: Xianhai Mao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Mao Xianhai, Email:
引用本文:

田朕安, 张恒, 段小辉, 田秉璋, 杨建辉, 张鸿渐, 毛先海. 腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查一期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 09(05): 475-478.

Zhenan Tian, Heng Zhang, Xiaohui Duan, Bingzhang Tian, Jianhui Yang, Hongjian Zhang, Xianhai Mao. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration combined with primary suture for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 09(05): 475-478.

目的

探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查一期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年6月至2019年3月湖南师范大学附属第一医院收治的100例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据治疗方法不同分为腔镜组和开腹组,各50例。腔镜组男31例,女19例;年龄24~74岁,中位年龄47岁;采用腹腔镜胆囊切除+胆道探查取石术,一期缝合。开腹组男32例,女18例;年龄25~74岁,中位年龄47岁;采用开腹胆囊切除+胆道探查取石术+T管引流。观察两组围手术期情况和疗效。两组手术时间、术中出血量等比较采用t检验,治疗总有效率、并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

腔镜组平均手术时间、术中出血量、排气时间、术后住院时间分别为(90±17)min、(43±13)ml、(31±5)h、(7.7±1.2)d,明显少于开腹组的(118±21)min、(103±26)ml、(48±8)h、(9.9±1.6)d(t=-3.22,-6.35,-5.47,-3.48;P<0.05)。腔镜组总有效率为96%(48/50),明显高于开腹组的78%(39/50) (χ2=7.16,P<0.05)。腔镜组并发症发生率为6%(3/50),明显低于开腹组的20%(10/50) (χ2=4.33,P<0.05)。

结论

对于胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者,与开腹比较,腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查一期缝合治疗效果好,具有微创、恢复快、安全性高等优势。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration combined with primary suture for cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

Methods

Clinical data of 100 patients with cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University from June 2017 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different treatments, all patients were divided into laparoscopic group (n=50) and open surgery group (n=50). In the laparoscopic group, 31 patients were male and 19 female, aged 24-74 years with a median age of 47 years. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration combined with primary suture were performed. In the open surgery group, 32 cases were male and 18 female, aged 25-74 years with a median age of 47 years. Open cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration combined with T-tube drainage were performed. Perioperative conditions and clinical efficacy were observed in two groups. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss between two groups were statistically compared by t test. The total effective rate and incidence of postoperative complications were statistically compared by Chi-square test.

Results

The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss, exhaust time and length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group were (90±17) min, (43±13) ml, (31±5) h and (7.7±1.2) d, significantly less than those in the open surgery group (118±21) min, (103±26) ml, (48±8) h and (9.9±1.6) d, respectively (t=-3.22, -6.35, -5.47, -3.48; P<0.05). The total effective rate in the laparoscopic group was 96%(48/50), significantly higher than 78%(39/50) in the open surgery group (χ2=7.16, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the laparoscopic group was 6%(3/50), significantly lower than 20%(10/50) in the open surgery group (χ2=4.33, P<0.05).

Conclusions

Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration combined with primary suture has the advantages of higher efficacy, minimally invasive, quicker recovery and higher safety in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis complicated with choledocholithiasis.

表1 腔镜组和开腹组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者围手术期指标比较(±s
表2 腔镜组和开腹组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者疗效情况(例)
表3 腔镜组和开腹组胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者并发症发生情况(例)
[1]
钱英,田应彪,王玉和.胆囊结石的形成及常用药物的研究进展[J].现代医药卫生杂志,2018, 34(5):720-722.
[2]
陈铁炯,郑军.腹腔镜联合胆道镜与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石临床对比分析[J].中华全科医学杂志,2018, 16(2):226-228.
[3]
汪建初,浦涧,陆涛,等.胆道T管引流术后窦道形成的观察研究[J].肝胆外科杂志,2012, 20(5):383-385.
[4]
范海军,田大广,魏晓平.复发性肝内胆管结石病因机制及外科治疗研究进展[J].中国临床新医学,2019, 12(9):1029-1034.
[5]
张骏.腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的可行性及安全性分析[J/CD].临床医药文献电子杂志,2018, 5(A2):83-84.
[6]
罗健.用腹腔镜下胆囊切除术联合胆总管探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛杂志,2017, 15(22):145-146.
[7]
王财庆,庄端明,陈功.胆总管结石合并胆囊结石行腹腔镜胆总管探查取石并LC与内镜ERCP/EST联合LC的疗效比较[J]. 当代医学杂志,2018, 24(22):85-87.
[8]
毛旭南,张培建.不同术式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的应用进展[J/CD].中华普通外科学文献(电子版),2018, 12(6):429-433.
[9]
李振,邹卫华,蒋遗云.胆总管切开胆道镜探查及胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石疗效分析[J].当代医学杂志,2019, 25(30):155-156.
[10]
陈武,张曙光,刘建通.腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床效果[J].检验医学与临床,2018, 15(11):1654-1658.
[11]
焦西征.腹腔镜胆囊切除胆道探查术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床安全效果观察[J].中国医药指南,2019, 17(26):62-63.
[12]
Sina M, Hysa A, Gjata A, et al. Tu1110 inpatient management of gallstone disease in a country with limited ERCP availability: impact of choledocholithiasis on resource utilization[J]. Gastroenterology, 2015, 148(4 Suppl 1):S790.
[13]
孙百顺,张骏,康健.传统剖腹与微创手术在胆总管结石合并胆囊结石治疗中的效果分析[J].中国实用医药杂志,2019, 14(20): 43-45.
[14]
Salama AF, Abd Ellatif ME, Abd Elaziz H, et al. Preliminary experience with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. BMC Surg, 2017, 17(1): 32.
[15]
何培勇,覃文,孙丽娜,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查联合胆囊切除术治疗胆总管结石并胆囊结石的效果评价[J/CD].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019, 6(97):57-58.
[16]
谢伟选,罗昆仑.胆囊切除术联合腹腔镜下胆总管探查术后胆总管一期缝合与T管引流的疗效比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2019, 28(2):127-134.
[17]
吴涛,熊廷刚,高绪照,等.腹腔镜胆总管切开取石胆总管一期缝合的疗效与安全性分析[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2019, 31(8):486-488.
[18]
高旭升,柳杰,徐峰,等.腹腔镜联合胆道镜胆总管探查取石术后胆管一期缝合与T管引流的疗效比较[J].医学信息杂志,2019, 32(24):94-96.
[19]
刘双海,汤晓东,陈胜,等.腹腔镜胆道探查术胆管一期缝合与T管引流的疗效比较 [J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2012, 6(1):76-81.
[20]
Thacoor A, Pike TW, Pathak S, et al. The role of intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for ac ute gallstone pancreatitis: is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography needed?[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2019, 101(6):428-431.
[1] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[2] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[3] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[4] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[5] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[6] 张建波, 东爱华. 不同腹腔镜手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效及并发症对比[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 693-696.
[7] 杨雪, 张伟, 尚培中, 宋创业, 尚丹丹, 张蔚. 胆囊十二指肠瘘结石经瘘口排出后自愈一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 707-708.
[8] 陈宇凡, 屈振南, 陈宝坤. 1684例无症状胆囊结石患者病情进展影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 311-314.
[9] 中国研究型医院学会微创外科学专业委员会. 日间腹腔镜胆囊切除术专家共识[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 193-199.
[10] 牛朝, 李波, 张万福, 靳文帝, 王春晓, 李晓刚. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胆囊切除治疗肥胖合并胆囊结石安全性和疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 635-639.
[11] 周后平, 袁源, 欧廷政, 李贝贝, 尚明铭, 姚本能, 宋新, 罗雪梅. 胆囊板Laennec膜间隙逆行分离联合Pringle法在困难胆囊LC术中应用(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 540-544.
[12] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. 胆总管结石微创治疗进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 585-588.
[13] 周标, 陈达伟, 汤晓东, 陈胜, 刘双海, 邓志成. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管汇入部微切开取石在细径胆总管结石合并胆囊结石中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 422-426.
[14] 陆乔友, 寸冬云, 虞弘, 郭鹏恒, 田大广. ICG荧光胆道造影在胆囊结石合并胆囊炎患者LC术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 284-288.
[15] 田广磊, 侯梅华, 李智德, 余波锋, 马俊杰, 李婷婷, 王春, 陈伦牮, 陈雄. 胆囊结石合并混合性神经内分泌-非神经内分泌肿瘤一例报告[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 342-344.
阅读次数
全文


摘要