切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (02) : 181 -185. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.02.013

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

医源性胆管损伤外科治疗策略及疗效
吕少诚1, 贺强1,(), 郎韧1, 李立新1, 赵昕1, 任章勇1, 曹迪1   
  1. 1. 100020 北京,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-06 出版日期:2021-04-10
  • 通信作者: 贺强
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金青年项目(7194274); 北京市科学技术委员会首都临床特色应用研究专项(Z181100001718164)

Strategy and efficacy of surgical treatments for iatrogenic bile duct injury

Shaocheng Lyu1, Qiang He1,(), Ren Lang1, Lixin Li1, Xin Zhao1, Zhangyong Ren1, Di Cao1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2021-01-06 Published:2021-04-10
  • Corresponding author: Qiang He
引用本文:

吕少诚, 贺强, 郎韧, 李立新, 赵昕, 任章勇, 曹迪. 医源性胆管损伤外科治疗策略及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(02): 181-185.

Shaocheng Lyu, Qiang He, Ren Lang, Lixin Li, Xin Zhao, Zhangyong Ren, Di Cao. Strategy and efficacy of surgical treatments for iatrogenic bile duct injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(02): 181-185.

目的

探讨医源性胆管损伤(IBDI)外科治疗策略及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2019年12月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院收治的34例IBDI患者临床资料。其中男20例,女14例;平均年龄(53±15)岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。本院首诊的6例患者均为腹腔镜胆囊切除术中损伤。外院转入28例,其中腹腔镜胆囊切除术中损伤18例,开腹胆囊切除术中损伤5例,腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术中损伤4例,开腹胆总管切开取石术中损伤1例。分析患者外科治疗策略及疗效。

结果

本组患者胆管损伤主要发生在肝外胆总管区域,尤其是肝门区和胆总管上段。即时修复18例,早期修复6例,延迟修复10例。6例本院IBDI患者均及时一期行胆总管端端吻合术,其中2例患者留置T管。外院转入的28例患者再次手术方式包括:胆总管- 空肠吻合术13例,组织瓣胆总管修复术9例(胃瓣4例,胆囊瓣3例,空肠瓣2例),胆总管端端吻合+ T管引流术5例,右半肝切除术1例。围手术期并发症发生率为18%(6/34),无发生围手术期死亡。随访时间2~114个月,中位随访时间46个月。随访期间,评级优23例,良8例,优良率达91%(31/34)。

结论

术中早期诊断和合理的外科处理是治疗IBDI的关键,保留Oddi括约肌功能的各种胆道修复术是最佳治疗方式,远期效果确切。

Objective

To explore the strategy and efficacy of surgical treatments for iatrogenic bile duct injury (IBDI).

Methods

Clinical data of 34 IBDI patients admitted to Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 patients were male and 14 female, aged (53±15) years on average. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. 6 patients, initially admitted to our hospital, were diagnosed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced injuries. 28 cases were transferred to our hospital from other hospitals including 18 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy-induced injuries, 5 cases of open cholecystectomy-induced injuries, 4 cases of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy-induced injuries and 1 case of open choledocholithotomy-induced injury. The strategy and efficacy of surgical treatments were evaluated.

Results

The bile duct injuries mainly occurred in the extrahepatic common bile duct area, especially in the hilar area and the upper segment of common bile duct. Immediate repair was delivered in 18 cases, early repair in 6 cases and delayed repair in 10 cases. 6 IBDI patients in our hospital immediately underwent end-to-end anastomosis of common bile duct, including 2 cases with T-tube retention. 28 patients transferred from other hospitals underwent repeated operations as follows: choledochojejunostomy in 13 cases, common bile duct repair with tissue flaps in 9 cases (4 cases with stomach flaps, 3 cases with gallbladder flaps, 2 cases with jejunal flaps), end-to-end anastomosis of common bile duct and T-tube drainage in 5 cases, and right hemihepatectomy in 1 case, respectively. The incidence of perioperative complications was 18%(6/34). No perioperative death occurred. The follow-up time was 2 to 114 months with a median of 46 months. During the follow-up, excellent efficacy was observed in 23 cases and good in 8 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 91%(31/34).

Conclusions

Early diagnosis and reasonable surgical treatments during operation play a key role in the treatment of IBDI. Biliary tract repair with Oddi sphincter function-preserved is the optimal treatment which yields definite long-term efficacy.

表1 34例医源性胆管损伤分型及比例
图1 一例医源性胆总管损伤患者围手术期MRCP及胃瓣修补术
[1]
Carroll B. Iatrogenic bile duct injuries[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2017, 224(3):373.
[2]
Khadra H, Johnson H, Crowther J, et al. Bile duct injury repairs: progressive outcomes in a tertiary referral center[J]. Surgery, 2019, 166(4):698-702.
[3]
徐素琴,邹书兵. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关胆管损伤的研究进展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志,2019,28(2):227-233.
[4]
Schizas D, Papaconstantinou D, Moris D, et al. Management of segmental bile duct injuries after cholecystectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(2):408-416.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 胆管损伤的诊断和治疗指南(2013版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2013,12(2):81-95.
[6]
Pitt HA, Sherman S, Johnson MS, et al. Improved outcomes of bile duct injuries in the 21st century[J]. Ann Surg, 2013, 258(3):490-499.
[7]
吴金术,毛先海,廖春红,等. 101例医源性胆道损伤的临床分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2001,7(10):606-608.
[8]
Fingerhut A, Dziri C, Garden OJ, et al. ATOM, the all-inclusive, nominal EAES classification of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(12):4608-4619.
[9]
Wang X, Yu WL, Fu XH, et al. Early versus delayed surgical repair and referral for patients with bile duct injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(3):449-459.
[10]
Perera MT, Silva MA, Hegab B, et al. Specialist early and immediate repair of post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injuries is associated with an improved long-term outcome[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(3):553-560.
[11]
Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, et al. Iatrogenic biliary injury: 13,305 cholecystectomies experienced by a single surgical team over more than 13 years[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22(4):1077-1086.
[12]
Battal M, Yazici P, Bostanci O, et al. Early surgical repair of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the sooner the better[J]. Surg J, 2019, 5(4):e154-158.
[13]
Felekouras E, Petrou A, Neofytou K, et al. Early or delayed intervention for bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy? a dilemma looking for an answer[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2015:104235.
[14]
方德宝,陆震,袁笑,等. 胆囊切除术相关胆管损伤手术修复的临床分析[J]. 肝胆外科杂志,2019,27(4):253-258.
[15]
陈亚进,徐鋆耀. 胆管损伤的外科重建[J]. 中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(11):906-910.
[16]
刘厚宝,沈盛. 胆肠吻合在胆管损伤修复中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,2017,32(8):658-660.
[17]
罗丁,卿德科,余少明. 胆管损伤修复手术应注意的一些问题[J]. 国际外科学杂志,2016,43(7):478-480,封4.
[18]
Stilling NM, Fristrup C, Wettergren A, et al. Long-term outcome after early repair of iatrogenic bile duct injury. a national Danish multicentre study[J]. HPB, 2015, 17(5):394-400.
[19]
王宇宏,刘哲,向昕,等. 带血管蒂胃瓣组织修复损伤性胆管狭窄的长期疗效[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志,2017,23(5):313-316.
[20]
王宇宏,王敬. 损伤性胆管狭窄的外科治疗[J]. 中华医学杂志,2017,97(16):1209-1211.
[21]
Jabłońska B. Hepatectomy for bile duct injuries: when is it necessary?[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(38):6348-6352.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 刘敏, 唐恩溢, 刘喆, 葛苏蒙, 刘梅, 孙国文. 计算机导航技术在口腔颌面部微小异物取出手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 375-379.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[5] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[6] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[7] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[8] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[11] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[12] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[13] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[14] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?