切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 613 -618. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.06.005

临床研究

联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析
张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙()   
  1. 100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院普外科中心
    050000 石家庄,河北医科大学第一医院肝胆胰外科
    100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肝病消化中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-26 出版日期:2023-12-10
  • 通信作者: 王孟龙

Survival benefit of combined splenectomy in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection

Qikun Zhang, Fuchao Shang, Qi Li, Guangming Li, Menglong Wang()   

  1. General Surgery Center, Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
    Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    Digestive Hepatology Center, Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2023-07-26 Published:2023-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Menglong Wang
引用本文:

张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.

Qikun Zhang, Fuchao Shang, Qi Li, Guangming Li, Menglong Wang. Survival benefit of combined splenectomy in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 613-618.

目的

探讨联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益。

方法

回顾性分析2011年3月至2019年5月在首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院行肝癌根治性治疗的138例肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男84例,女54例;年龄26~76岁,中位年龄55岁。根据手术方式和肝癌分期不同分为根治性治疗联合脾切除术组(HS组,96例),其中T1期肝癌(HS1组)48例,T2期肝癌(HS2组)39例,T3期肝癌(HS3组)9例;同期T1期接受单独肝癌根治性治疗的42例作为对照(HA1组)。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。两组围手术期情况比较采用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验或χ2检验。

结果

HS组中位RFS、OS分别为22.3、46.0个月。其中HS1组术后1、2、5年RFS分别为90.2%、76.5%、51.0%,HS2组相应为48.6%、24.3%、10.8%,HS3组相应为42.9%、28.6%、28.6%,3组术后1、2、5年RFS比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.276,26.206,17.124;P<0.05)。HS1组术后1、2、5年OS分别为95.8%、79.2%、47.9%,HS2组相应为84.6%、69.2%、25.6%,HS3组相应为77.7%、55.6%、33.3%,3组术后5年OS比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.416,P<0.05)。HS1组和HA1组术后1、2年RFS分别为95.0%、81.0%和81.3%、66.7%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.378,4.944;P<0.05)。HS1组和HA1组术前有曲张静脉破裂出血史20、2例,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=14.581,P<0.05);两组术前Hb中位数分别为115(49)、126(20) g/L,PTA分别为73%(12%)、78%(7%),肝弹性硬度分别为19(12)、15(10) kPa,术中出血量分别为300(275)、150(100)ml,手术时间分别为4.1(2.3)、3.5(1.6)h,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-2.115,-2.768,2.374,3.171,2.804;P<0.05)。两组均无术后早期死亡。

结论

联合脾切除可提高T1期肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后早期RFS。此类获益患者术前消化道出血史比例较高、凝血功能较差,肝硬化程度较高,联合脾切除虽然增加手术时间和术中出血量,但总体安全。

Objective

To evaluate the survival benefit of combined splenectomy in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection.

Methods

Clinical data of 138 patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension who underwent radical resection in Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from March 2011 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 84 patients were male and 54 female, aged from 26 to 76 years, with a median age of 55 years. According to different surgical methods and liver cancer stages, all patients were divided into radical resection combined with splenectomy group (HS group, n=96), including 48 cases of T1 stage liver cancer (HS1 group), 39 cases of T2 stage (HS2 group) and 9 cases of T3 stage (HS3 group). 42 patients withT1 stage liver cancer who received radical resection alone were used as controls (HA1 group). Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Perioperative status between two groups was compared by t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-square test.

Results

The median RFS and OS in the HS groupwere 22.3 and 46.0 months. The postoperative 1-, 2-, 5-year RFS were 90.2%, 76.5%, 51.0% in the HS1 group,48.6%, 24.3%, 10.8% in the HS2 group, and 42.9%, 28.6%, 28.6% in the HS3 group, respectively. The differences were statistically significant in the postoperative 1-, 2-, 5-year RFS among three groups (χ2=22.276, 26.206, 17.124; P<0.05). The postoperative 1-, 2-, 5-year OS were 95.8%, 79.2%, 47.9% in the HS1 group, 84.6%, 69.2%, 25.6% in the HS2 group, and 77.7%, 55.6%, 33.3% in the HS3 group, respectively. The differences in the postoperative 5-year OS were statistically significant among three groups (χ2=11.416, P<0.05). In the HS1 and HA1 groups, the postoperative 1- and 2-year RFS were 95.0%, 81.0% and 81.3%, 66.7% respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=6.378, 4.944; P<0.05). In the HS1 and HA1 groups,20 and 2 patients had a history of varicose vein rupture and bleeding, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=14.581, P<0.05). The median Hb before operation was 115(49) and 126(20) g/L, PTA was 73%(12%) and 78%(7%), liver stiffness was 19(12) and 15(10) kPa, intraoperative blood loss was 300(275) and 150(100) ml, operation time was 4.1(2.3) and 3.5(1.6) h, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (Z=-2.115, -2.768, 2.374, 3.171, 2.804; P<0.05). No patient died early after surgery in two groups.

Conclusions

Combined splenectomy can improve early RFS of patients with T1 stage liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection. A high proportion of preoperative gastrointestinal bleeding history, poor coagulation and high grade of liver cirrhosis are observed in these patients. Although combined splenectomy increases operation time and intraoperative bleeding, it is generally safe.

图1 不同肝癌分期根治性治疗联合脾切除术患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线比较
图2 HS1组与HA1组术后无复发生存的Kaplan-Meier曲线比较注:HS1组为T1期肝癌根治性治疗联合脾切除术组,HA1组为T1期接受单独肝癌根治性治疗组
表1 HS1组和HA1组患者临床病理特征比较
变量 HS1组 HA1组 统计值 P
性别(例)     χ2=0.849 0.357
24 26    
24 16    
年龄(岁,±s) 53±10 54±8 t=-0.780 0.438
病因(例)     - 0.054
乙型病毒性肝炎 43 30    
丙型病毒性肝炎 5 10    
酒精性肝病或其它 0 2    
静脉曲张破裂出血史(例) 20 2 χ2=14.581 0.000
术前肝癌治疗史(例) 10 7 χ2=0.055 0.815
术前抗病毒治疗(例) 36 31 χ2=0.000 1.000
WBC[×109/L,M(QR)] 2.2(1.3) 2.4(1.0) Z=-0.182 0.856
NLR[M(QR)] 0.5(0.3) 0.4(0.3) Z=0.158 0.875
Hb[g/L,M(QR)] 115(49) 126(20) Z=-2.115 0.034
Plt[×109/L,M(QR)] 43(25) 45(21) Z=-0.562 0.574
ALT[U/L,M(QR)] 29(22) 31(23) Z=-1.428 0.153
TB[μmol/L,M(QR)] 18(12) 19(9) Z=-0.138 0.891
ALB(g/L,±s) 37±5 38±4 t=-0.815 0.417
Child-Pugh分级(例)     χ2=1.543 0.214
A级 39 38    
B级 9 4    
PTA[%,M(QR)] 73(12) 78(7) Z=-2.768 0.006
肝弹性硬度[kPa,M(QR)] 19(12) 15(10) Z=2.374 0.018
肿瘤直径[mm,M(QR)] 20(16) 20(10) Z=0.150 0.881
术后病理(例)     χ2=5.177 0.075
高分化 18 7    
中分化 15 20    
低分化 15 15    
MVI(例) 9 6 χ2=0.080 0.777
手术方式(例)     χ2=0.962 0.327
切除 30 21    
射频消融 18 21    
术中出血量[ml,M(QR)] 300(275) 150(100) Z=3.171 0.002
手术时间[h,M(QR)] 4.1(2.3) 3.5(1.6) Z=2.804 0.005
术后住院时间[d,M(QR)] 15(6) 14(7) Z=1.529 0.126
术后腹腔渗血(例) 3 1 χ2=0.141 0.707
术后大量腹腔积液(例) 5 3 χ2=0.030 0.862
术后一过性胰瘘(例) 3 0 - 0.289
术后早期门静脉血栓(例) 4 0 - 0.161
[1]
Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7):783-791.
[2]
国家卫生健康委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(2):81-96.
[3]
Li W, Shen SQ, Wu SM, et al. Simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy versus hepatectomy alone for hepatocellular carcinoma complicated by hypersplenism: a meta-analysis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2015(8):2129-2137.
[4]
Zhang X, Li C, Wen T, et al. Synchronous splenectomy and hepatectomy for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma and pathological spleen-neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio changes can predict the prognosis[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(28):46298-46311.
[5]
Xie XL, Liu X, Ou J. Is synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy superior to hepatectomy alone for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension?[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 120(2):316-317.
[6]
Zhang XY, Li C, Wen TF, et al. Synchronous splenectomy and hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hypersplenism: a case-control study[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(8):2358-2366.
[7]
European Association For The Study Of The Liver, European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2012, 56(4):908-943.
[8]
Takeishi K, Kawanaka H, Itoh S, et al. Impact of splenic volume and splenectomy on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria after curative hepatectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(4):1120-1128.
[9]
Chen XP, Wu ZD, Huang ZY, et al. Use of hepatectomy and splenectomy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhotic hypersplenism[J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(3):334-339.
[10]
Athanasiou A, Spartalis E, Hennessy M, et al. Effects of terlipressin versus splenectomy on liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats: what we know so far?[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018, 17(1):91-92.
[11]
Hirakawa Y, Ogata T, Sasada T, et al. Immunological consequences following splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(1):848-856.
[12]
Chai ZT, Zhang XP, Shao M, et al. Impact of splenomegaly and splenectomy on prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus treated with hepatectomy[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(3):247.
[13]
Jia Z, Zhang K, Jiang L, et al. Simultaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with laparoscopic splenectomy: a safe and effective way for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with cirrhosis and hypersplenism[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2020, 29(3):177-184.
[14]
Kong J, Shen S, Wang W. Synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy vs hepatectomy for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 119(7):964-973.
[15]
Liu X, Chen Z, Yu M, et al. Safety of simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with hypersplenism: a meta-analysis[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2019:9065845.
[16]
Rizzo A, Dadduzio V, Ricci AD, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab: the next frontier for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2022, 31(4):371-378.
[17]
张其坤, 张振, 马超, 等. 腹腔镜脾切断流术治疗门静脉高压消化道出血的临床疗效及手术入路研究[J]. 北京医学, 2022, 44(6):141-145.
[18]
Zhang Y, Xu BY, Wang XB, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis and acute decompensation[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 18(11): 2564-2572; 2564-2572, e1.
[1] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[2] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[3] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[7] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[8] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[9] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[10] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[11] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[12] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要