切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 613 -618. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.06.005

所属专题: 临床研究

临床研究

联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析
张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙()   
  1. 100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院普外科中心
    050000 石家庄,河北医科大学第一医院肝胆胰外科
    100069 首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肝病消化中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-26 出版日期:2023-12-10
  • 通信作者: 王孟龙

Survival benefit of combined splenectomy in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection

Qikun Zhang, Fuchao Shang, Qi Li, Guangming Li, Menglong Wang()   

  1. General Surgery Center, Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
    Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    Digestive Hepatology Center, Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2023-07-26 Published:2023-12-10
  • Corresponding author: Menglong Wang
引用本文:

张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.

Qikun Zhang, Fuchao Shang, Qi Li, Guangming Li, Menglong Wang. Survival benefit of combined splenectomy in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(06): 613-618.

目的

探讨联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益。

方法

回顾性分析2011年3月至2019年5月在首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院行肝癌根治性治疗的138例肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男84例,女54例;年龄26~76岁,中位年龄55岁。根据手术方式和肝癌分期不同分为根治性治疗联合脾切除术组(HS组,96例),其中T1期肝癌(HS1组)48例,T2期肝癌(HS2组)39例,T3期肝癌(HS3组)9例;同期T1期接受单独肝癌根治性治疗的42例作为对照(HA1组)。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。两组围手术期情况比较采用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验或χ2检验。

结果

HS组中位RFS、OS分别为22.3、46.0个月。其中HS1组术后1、2、5年RFS分别为90.2%、76.5%、51.0%,HS2组相应为48.6%、24.3%、10.8%,HS3组相应为42.9%、28.6%、28.6%,3组术后1、2、5年RFS比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.276,26.206,17.124;P<0.05)。HS1组术后1、2、5年OS分别为95.8%、79.2%、47.9%,HS2组相应为84.6%、69.2%、25.6%,HS3组相应为77.7%、55.6%、33.3%,3组术后5年OS比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.416,P<0.05)。HS1组和HA1组术后1、2年RFS分别为95.0%、81.0%和81.3%、66.7%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.378,4.944;P<0.05)。HS1组和HA1组术前有曲张静脉破裂出血史20、2例,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=14.581,P<0.05);两组术前Hb中位数分别为115(49)、126(20) g/L,PTA分别为73%(12%)、78%(7%),肝弹性硬度分别为19(12)、15(10) kPa,术中出血量分别为300(275)、150(100)ml,手术时间分别为4.1(2.3)、3.5(1.6)h,差异均有统计学意义(Z=-2.115,-2.768,2.374,3.171,2.804;P<0.05)。两组均无术后早期死亡。

结论

联合脾切除可提高T1期肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后早期RFS。此类获益患者术前消化道出血史比例较高、凝血功能较差,肝硬化程度较高,联合脾切除虽然增加手术时间和术中出血量,但总体安全。

Objective

To evaluate the survival benefit of combined splenectomy in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection.

Methods

Clinical data of 138 patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension who underwent radical resection in Beijing You'an Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from March 2011 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 84 patients were male and 54 female, aged from 26 to 76 years, with a median age of 55 years. According to different surgical methods and liver cancer stages, all patients were divided into radical resection combined with splenectomy group (HS group, n=96), including 48 cases of T1 stage liver cancer (HS1 group), 39 cases of T2 stage (HS2 group) and 9 cases of T3 stage (HS3 group). 42 patients withT1 stage liver cancer who received radical resection alone were used as controls (HA1 group). Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Perioperative status between two groups was compared by t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-square test.

Results

The median RFS and OS in the HS groupwere 22.3 and 46.0 months. The postoperative 1-, 2-, 5-year RFS were 90.2%, 76.5%, 51.0% in the HS1 group,48.6%, 24.3%, 10.8% in the HS2 group, and 42.9%, 28.6%, 28.6% in the HS3 group, respectively. The differences were statistically significant in the postoperative 1-, 2-, 5-year RFS among three groups (χ2=22.276, 26.206, 17.124; P<0.05). The postoperative 1-, 2-, 5-year OS were 95.8%, 79.2%, 47.9% in the HS1 group, 84.6%, 69.2%, 25.6% in the HS2 group, and 77.7%, 55.6%, 33.3% in the HS3 group, respectively. The differences in the postoperative 5-year OS were statistically significant among three groups (χ2=11.416, P<0.05). In the HS1 and HA1 groups, the postoperative 1- and 2-year RFS were 95.0%, 81.0% and 81.3%, 66.7% respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=6.378, 4.944; P<0.05). In the HS1 and HA1 groups,20 and 2 patients had a history of varicose vein rupture and bleeding, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=14.581, P<0.05). The median Hb before operation was 115(49) and 126(20) g/L, PTA was 73%(12%) and 78%(7%), liver stiffness was 19(12) and 15(10) kPa, intraoperative blood loss was 300(275) and 150(100) ml, operation time was 4.1(2.3) and 3.5(1.6) h, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (Z=-2.115, -2.768, 2.374, 3.171, 2.804; P<0.05). No patient died early after surgery in two groups.

Conclusions

Combined splenectomy can improve early RFS of patients with T1 stage liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension after radical resection. A high proportion of preoperative gastrointestinal bleeding history, poor coagulation and high grade of liver cirrhosis are observed in these patients. Although combined splenectomy increases operation time and intraoperative bleeding, it is generally safe.

图1 不同肝癌分期根治性治疗联合脾切除术患者Kaplan-Meier生存曲线比较
图2 HS1组与HA1组术后无复发生存的Kaplan-Meier曲线比较注:HS1组为T1期肝癌根治性治疗联合脾切除术组,HA1组为T1期接受单独肝癌根治性治疗组
表1 HS1组和HA1组患者临床病理特征比较
变量 HS1组 HA1组 统计值 P
性别(例)     χ2=0.849 0.357
24 26    
24 16    
年龄(岁,±s) 53±10 54±8 t=-0.780 0.438
病因(例)     - 0.054
乙型病毒性肝炎 43 30    
丙型病毒性肝炎 5 10    
酒精性肝病或其它 0 2    
静脉曲张破裂出血史(例) 20 2 χ2=14.581 0.000
术前肝癌治疗史(例) 10 7 χ2=0.055 0.815
术前抗病毒治疗(例) 36 31 χ2=0.000 1.000
WBC[×109/L,M(QR)] 2.2(1.3) 2.4(1.0) Z=-0.182 0.856
NLR[M(QR)] 0.5(0.3) 0.4(0.3) Z=0.158 0.875
Hb[g/L,M(QR)] 115(49) 126(20) Z=-2.115 0.034
Plt[×109/L,M(QR)] 43(25) 45(21) Z=-0.562 0.574
ALT[U/L,M(QR)] 29(22) 31(23) Z=-1.428 0.153
TB[μmol/L,M(QR)] 18(12) 19(9) Z=-0.138 0.891
ALB(g/L,±s) 37±5 38±4 t=-0.815 0.417
Child-Pugh分级(例)     χ2=1.543 0.214
A级 39 38    
B级 9 4    
PTA[%,M(QR)] 73(12) 78(7) Z=-2.768 0.006
肝弹性硬度[kPa,M(QR)] 19(12) 15(10) Z=2.374 0.018
肿瘤直径[mm,M(QR)] 20(16) 20(10) Z=0.150 0.881
术后病理(例)     χ2=5.177 0.075
高分化 18 7    
中分化 15 20    
低分化 15 15    
MVI(例) 9 6 χ2=0.080 0.777
手术方式(例)     χ2=0.962 0.327
切除 30 21    
射频消融 18 21    
术中出血量[ml,M(QR)] 300(275) 150(100) Z=3.171 0.002
手术时间[h,M(QR)] 4.1(2.3) 3.5(1.6) Z=2.804 0.005
术后住院时间[d,M(QR)] 15(6) 14(7) Z=1.529 0.126
术后腹腔渗血(例) 3 1 χ2=0.141 0.707
术后大量腹腔积液(例) 5 3 χ2=0.030 0.862
术后一过性胰瘘(例) 3 0 - 0.289
术后早期门静脉血栓(例) 4 0 - 0.161
[1]
Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, et al. Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020[J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2021, 134(7):783-791.
[2]
国家卫生健康委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗指南(2022年版)[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2022, 16(2):81-96.
[3]
Li W, Shen SQ, Wu SM, et al. Simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy versus hepatectomy alone for hepatocellular carcinoma complicated by hypersplenism: a meta-analysis[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2015(8):2129-2137.
[4]
Zhang X, Li C, Wen T, et al. Synchronous splenectomy and hepatectomy for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma and pathological spleen-neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio changes can predict the prognosis[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(28):46298-46311.
[5]
Xie XL, Liu X, Ou J. Is synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy superior to hepatectomy alone for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension?[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 120(2):316-317.
[6]
Zhang XY, Li C, Wen TF, et al. Synchronous splenectomy and hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hypersplenism: a case-control study[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(8):2358-2366.
[7]
European Association For The Study Of The Liver, European Organisation For Research And Treatment Of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. J Hepatol, 2012, 56(4):908-943.
[8]
Takeishi K, Kawanaka H, Itoh S, et al. Impact of splenic volume and splenectomy on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria after curative hepatectomy[J]. World J Surg, 2018, 42(4):1120-1128.
[9]
Chen XP, Wu ZD, Huang ZY, et al. Use of hepatectomy and splenectomy to treat hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhotic hypersplenism[J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(3):334-339.
[10]
Athanasiou A, Spartalis E, Hennessy M, et al. Effects of terlipressin versus splenectomy on liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats: what we know so far?[J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2018, 17(1):91-92.
[11]
Hirakawa Y, Ogata T, Sasada T, et al. Immunological consequences following splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(1):848-856.
[12]
Chai ZT, Zhang XP, Shao M, et al. Impact of splenomegaly and splenectomy on prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus treated with hepatectomy[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(3):247.
[13]
Jia Z, Zhang K, Jiang L, et al. Simultaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with laparoscopic splenectomy: a safe and effective way for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with cirrhosis and hypersplenism[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2020, 29(3):177-184.
[14]
Kong J, Shen S, Wang W. Synchronous hepatectomy and splenectomy vs hepatectomy for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and clinically significant portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2019, 119(7):964-973.
[15]
Liu X, Chen Z, Yu M, et al. Safety of simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with hypersplenism: a meta-analysis[J]. Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2019:9065845.
[16]
Rizzo A, Dadduzio V, Ricci AD, et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab: the next frontier for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2022, 31(4):371-378.
[17]
张其坤, 张振, 马超, 等. 腹腔镜脾切断流术治疗门静脉高压消化道出血的临床疗效及手术入路研究[J]. 北京医学, 2022, 44(6):141-145.
[18]
Zhang Y, Xu BY, Wang XB, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis and acute decompensation[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 18(11): 2564-2572; 2564-2572, e1.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[6] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[7] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[8] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[9] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[10] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 卓文锋, 曾桂芳, 杨思加, 赵家立, 邹宝嘉, 白子锐, 林恩, 李坚. 腹腔镜巨脾切除术:逐步打破的手术壁垒[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 783-788.
[13] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[14] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[15] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?