切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 274 -278. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.03.009

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

S指数对符合米兰标准的肝癌合并慢性乙肝患者术后预后的预测价值
刀辰冉1, 陈义发1,(), 阿力木江·买合木提1, 徐磊1, 陈姚1   
  1. 1. 430030 武汉,华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肝脏外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-24 出版日期:2021-06-10
  • 通信作者: 陈义发

Predictive value of S index for clinical prognosis of patients with liver cancer meeting Milan criteria complicated with chronic hepatitis B after hepatectomy

Chenran Dao1, Yifa Chen1,(), Maihemuti Alimujiang·1, Lei Xu1, Yao Chen1   

  1. 1. Liver Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2021-02-24 Published:2021-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Yifa Chen
引用本文:

刀辰冉, 陈义发, 阿力木江·买合木提, 徐磊, 陈姚. S指数对符合米兰标准的肝癌合并慢性乙肝患者术后预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 274-278.

Chenran Dao, Yifa Chen, Maihemuti Alimujiang·, Lei Xu, Yao Chen. Predictive value of S index for clinical prognosis of patients with liver cancer meeting Milan criteria complicated with chronic hepatitis B after hepatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(03): 274-278.

目的

探讨肝纤维化指标S指数对符合米兰标准的肝癌合并慢性乙型病毒性肝炎(CHB)患者根治性肝切除术后复发和生存的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2015年12月在华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院行根治性切除术的287例符合米兰标准的肝癌合并CHB患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男248例,女39例;年龄22~78岁,中位年龄为51岁。采用ROC曲线确定S指数的最佳界值,根据最佳界值分组。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。采用Cox比例风险回归模型行预后单因素和多因素分析。

结果

S指数≤0.16组(低S指数组)患者术后1、3、5年无瘤生存率分别为90.1%、73.6%、62.4%,S指数>0.16组(高S指数组)相应为80.7%、52.4%和40.8%;低S指数组术后1、3、5年总体生存率分别为97.5%、86.0%、81.1%,高S指数组相应为95.2%、72.9%、60.7%;高S指数患者术后无瘤生存率和总体生存率较差(HR=1.994,2.687;P <0.05)。Cox多因素分析显示,S指数>0.16是患者术后无瘤生存和总体生存的独立危险因素(HR=1.837,2.309;P <0.05)。

结论

S指数可作为临床预测符合米兰标准的肝癌合并CHB患者预后的一项参考指标,S指数>0.16提示术后复发率高,患者预后较差。

Objective

To evaluate the predictive value of liver fibrosis indicator S index for the recurrence and survival of patients with liver cancer meeting Milan criteria complicated with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after radical hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 287 patients with liver cancer meeting Milan criteria complicated with CHB who underwent radical hepatectomy in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 248 patients were male and 39 female, aged from 22 to 78 years, with a median age of 51 years. The optimal cut-off value of S index was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. All patients were divided into two groups according to the optimal cut-off value. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test. Cox's proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical prognosis.

Results

The postoperative 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival of patients with S index≤0.16 (low S index group) were 90.1%, 73.6% and 62.4%, and were 80.7%, 52.4% and 40.8% in patients with S index > 0.16 (high S index group). The postoperative 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival in low S index group were 97.5%, 86.0% and 81.1%, and were 95.2%, 72.9% and 60.7% in high S index group. The postoperative disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with high S index after hepatectomy were significantly worse compared with those with low S index (HR=1.994, 2.687; P<0.05). Cox's multivariate analysis showed that S index > 0.16 was an independent risk factor for the postoperative tumor-free survival and overall survival of patients (HR=1.837, 2.309; P<0.05).

Conclusions

S index can serve asa reference parameter to predict the prognosis of patients with liver cancer meeting Milan criteria complicated with CHB. S index > 0.16 indicates high recurrence rate and poor clinical prognosis.

图1 S指数和FIB-4指数预测肝癌合并慢性乙型病毒性肝炎患者术后预后的ROC曲线
图2 不同S指数分组符合米兰标准的肝癌合并CHB患者根治性切除术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
图3 不同FIB-4指数分组符合米兰标准的肝癌合并CHB患者根治性切除术后Kaplan-Meier生存曲线
表1 符合米兰标准的肝癌合并CHB患者术后无瘤生存的Cox多因素分析结果
表2 符合米兰标准的肝癌合CHB患者术后总体生存的Cox多因素分析结果
[1]
Zheng R, Qu C, Zhang S, et al. Liver cancer incidence and mortality in China: temporal trends and projections to 2030[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2018, 30(6):571-579.
[2]
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2018, 391(10127):1301-1314.
[3]
陈孝平,朱鹏. 以手术治疗为主的肝癌个体化综合治疗[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2016, 36(6):596-598, 602.
[4]
樊嘉,王征. 原发性肝癌的手术切除[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2010, 48(3):167-168.
[5]
Kwon OS, Choi SH, Kim JH. Inflammation and hepatic fibrosis, then hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2015, 66(6): 320-324.
[6]
Zhou K, Gao CF, Zhao YP, et al. Simpler score of routine laboratory tests predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010, 25(9):1569-1577.
[7]
Mallet V, Dhalluin-Venier V, Roussin C, et al. The accuracy of the FIB-4 index for the diagnosis of mild fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2009, 29(4):409-415.
[8]
中华医学会感染病学分会,中华医学会肝病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2019年版)[J/CD]. 中国肝脏病杂志(电子版), 2019, 11(4):5-27.
[9]
O'Rourke JM, Sagar VM, Shah T, et al. Carcinogenesis on the background of liver fibrosis: implications for the management of hepatocellular cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2018, 24(39):4436-4447.
[10]
Sasaki K, Shindoh J, Margonis GA, et al. Effect of background liver cirrhosis on outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. JAMA Surg, 2017, 152(3):e165059.
[11]
梁宾勇,黄志勇,刘杨安, 等. 肝硬化对单个小肝细胞癌切除术后复发和患者长期生存的影响[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2012, 50(10): 865-869.
[12]
Eminler AT, Irak K, Ayyildiz T, et al. The relation between liver histopathology and GGT levels in viral hepatitis: more important in hepatitis B[J]. Turk J Gastroenterol, 2014, 25(4):411-415.
[13]
Sun P, Li Y, Chang L, et al. Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of gamma-glutamyltransferase in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2019, 98(19):e15603.
[14]
Yang YT, Wang LL, Yan LT, et al. Platelet count is closely associated with the severity of liver injury in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a cross-sectional study[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2020, 20(1):243-250.
[15]
Pang Q, Qu K, Zhang JY, et al. The prognostic value of platelet count in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Medicine, 2015, 94(37):e1431.
[16]
Pang Q, Zhang JY, Xu XS, et al. Significance of platelet count and platelet-based models for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(18):5607-5621.
[17]
Lisman T, Luyendyk JP. Platelets as modulators of liver diseases[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2018, 44(2):114-125.
[18]
Carr BI, Guerra V. Serum albumin levels in relation to tumor parameters in hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. Int J Biol Markers, 2017, 32(4):e391-396.
[19]
Giannini EG, Testa R, Savarino V. Liver enzyme alteration: a guide for clinicians[J]. CMAJ, 2005, 172(3):367-379.
[20]
Zhang LX, Lv Y, Xu AM, et al. The prognostic significance of serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels and AST/ALT in primary hepatic carcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2019, 19(1):841.
[21]
Okamura Y, Ashida R, Yamamoto Y, et al. FIB-4 index is a predictor of background liver fibrosis and long-term outcomes after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2016, 23(Suppl 4):467-474.
[22]
Chen L, Cai BB, Zhou CJ, et al. A sample model established by S-index predicting overall survival after curative resection of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2019(11):693-703.
[1] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[2] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[3] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[4] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[5] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[6] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[7] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[8] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[9] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[10] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[11] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[12] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[13] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
[14] 王湛, 李文坤, 杨奕, 徐芳, 周敏思, 苏珈仪, 王亚丹, 吴静. 炎症指标在早发性结直肠肿瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 802-810.
[15] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?