切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (05) : 502 -505. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.05.015

临床研究

ERCP在胆囊切除术后胆总管结石治疗中的应用
林颖1, 林显艺1, 陈荣1, 潘雪梅1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院消化科
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-22 出版日期:2021-08-17
  • 通信作者: 潘雪梅
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(82070574)

Application of ERCP in treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy

Ying Lin1, Xianyi Lin1, Rong Chen1, Xuemei Pan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2021-06-22 Published:2021-08-17
  • Corresponding author: Xuemei Pan
引用本文:

林颖, 林显艺, 陈荣, 潘雪梅. ERCP在胆囊切除术后胆总管结石治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(05): 502-505.

Ying Lin, Xianyi Lin, Rong Chen, Xuemei Pan. Application of ERCP in treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(05): 502-505.

目的

探讨ERCP在胆囊切除术后胆总管结石治疗中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2011年1月至2021年4月在中山大学附属第三医院首次行ERCP治疗的76例胆囊切除术后胆总管结石患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男46例,女30例;平均年龄(61±13)岁。观察患者ERCP治疗情况、并发症发生情况及疗效。

结果

74例患者均顺利完成ERCP,2例患者取石失败,取石成功率97%(74/76)。手术时间(98±60)min。术后住院时间2~18 d,中位住院时间5 d。6例患者术后发生并发症,发生率8%(6/76),其中2例术后轻型胰腺炎,4例感染,均保守治疗后治愈。5例患者术后结石复发,反复行ERCP治疗,复发率7%(5/74)。

结论

对于胆囊切除术后胆总管结石患者,ERCP是一种创伤小、安全、有效的治疗方法,可作为非手术治疗的首选方法。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 76 patients with common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy who received initial ERCP in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2011 to April 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 46 patients were male and 30 female, aged (61±13) years on average. ERCP treatment, complications and clinical effects were observed.

Results

ERCP in all 74 patients were completed successfully, whereas stone removal failed in 2 cases. The success rate of stone removal was 97%(74/76). The operation time was (98±60) min. The length of postoperative hospital stay was 2-18 d, witha median 5 d. Postoperative complications occurred in 6 cases with an incidence rate of 8%(6/76). Among them, 2 cases developed mild pancreatitis and 4 cases of infection, and all were cured after conservative treatments. 5 patients presented with postoperative recurrence of stones and received repeated ERCP treatment. The stone recurrence rate was 7%(5/74).

Conclusions

ERCP is a minimally invasive, safe and effective method for patients with common bile duct stones after cholecystectomy, which can be considered as the primary option of non-surgical treatments.

[1]
Dasari BV,,Tan CJ,,Gurusamy KS,et al.Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013(12):CD003327.
[2]
卢绮萍. 关注胆囊结石病治疗策略的争议、共识与发展[J]. 腹部外科, 2017, 30(5):334-337.
[3]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组. 胆囊良性疾病治疗决策的专家共识(2011版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2011, 10(1): 14-19.
[4]
杜开放, 吕文才, 邹运, 等. 胆囊切除术后原发性胆总管结石的研究现状[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2019, 31(2):122-124,封3.
[5]
Martin DJ,,Vernon D,,Toouli J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones[J]. Coehrane Database Syst Rev, 2006, 19(2): CD003327.
[6]
王怀志,苑军正,汪海,等. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术后残余胆管结石原因分析及处理[J/CD]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 201610(2):179-180.
[7]
Choi YS, Do JH, Suh SW, et al. Risk factors for the late development of common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(11):4857-4862.
[8]
中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会胆道外科医师委员会. 胆囊切除术后常见并发症的诊断与治疗专家共识(2018版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(4):325-328.
[9]
奚士航, 王小明, 季月辉, 等. LCBDE与ERCP/EST治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的疗效对比[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2018, 39(21):2489-2491.
[10]
李富国. ERCP在胆囊切除术后胆总管结石诊断与治疗中的价值评价[J]. 北方药学, 2011, 8(4):52-53, 10.
[11]
宋敏, 黄晓东, 王萍, 等. 不同方法对胆囊切除术后胆总管结石患者的诊疗评价[J]. 临床消化病杂志, 2008, 20(1):50-52.
[12]
Freeman ML. Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J]. Curt Gastroenterol Rep, 2003, 5(2):145-153.
[13]
蔡宇, 何彦安. 胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管切开取石T管引流术后结石复发危险因素分析[J]. 肝胆外科杂志, 2016, 24(3):203-205.
[14]
高登有, 宗德宝, 刘鹏飞. 腹腔镜胆道探查术与ERCP治疗胆囊切除术后胆总管结石的效果及复发率比较[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2019, 4(9):89-91.
[15]
Liu J, Jin L, Zhang Z. Laparoscopic transcystic treatment biliary calculi by laser lithotripsy[J]. JSLS, 2016, 20(4):e2016.00068.
[16]
徐晓欧. 取石球囊和网篮在内镜治疗肝外胆道结石中的临床应用[D]. 沈阳: 中国医科大学, 2014.
[17]
于剑锋, 郝建宇, 吴东方, 等. 经内镜胆道内支架放置术和鼻胆管引流术治疗各级急性胆管炎的效果比较[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2019, 36(3):169-175.
[18]
吴丽颖, 王书海, 贾国法, 等. 经十二指肠镜乳头括约肌切开取石术后胆总管结石复发危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2015, 5(1):5-9.
[19]
Konsten J, Gouma DJ, von Meyenfeldt MF, et al. Long-term follow-up after open cholecystectomy[J]. Br J Surg, 1993, 80(1):100-102.
[20]
Chen CM, Tay KH, Hoe MN, et a1. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography management of common bile duct stones in asurgical unit[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2005, 75(12):1070-1072.
[1] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[2] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[3] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[6] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[7] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗的项目介绍[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 125-125.
[8] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[9] 袁园园, 岳乐淇, 张华兴, 武艳, 李全海. 间充质干细胞在呼吸系统疾病模型中肺组织分布及治疗机制的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 374-381.
[10] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[11] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[12] 国文凯, 纪鹏程, 毕靖茹, 谢院生. IgA 肾病的十种治疗措施[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 327-333.
[13] 帖璇, 苏晓乐, 王利华. 抗中性粒细胞胞质抗体相关性血管炎治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 345-351.
[14] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[15] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?