切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 564 -569. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.06.007

临床研究

PTCD与ERCP+ENBD在恶性梗阻性黄疸姑息性治疗中疗效比较
郭志唐1, 白锦峰1, 孙敏1, 滕毅山1, 李世思1, 陈章彬1,()   
  1. 1. 650101 昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科三病区
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-09 出版日期:2021-09-23
  • 通信作者: 陈章彬

Comparison of efficacy between PTCD and ERCP+ENBD in palliative treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice

Zhitang Guo1, Jinfeng Bai1, Min Sun1, Yishan Teng1, Shisi Li1, Zhangbin Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650101, China
  • Received:2021-08-09 Published:2021-09-23
  • Corresponding author: Zhangbin Chen
引用本文:

郭志唐, 白锦峰, 孙敏, 滕毅山, 李世思, 陈章彬. PTCD与ERCP+ENBD在恶性梗阻性黄疸姑息性治疗中疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 564-569.

Zhitang Guo, Jinfeng Bai, Min Sun, Yishan Teng, Shisi Li, Zhangbin Chen. Comparison of efficacy between PTCD and ERCP+ENBD in palliative treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(06): 564-569.

目的

探讨PTCD与ERCP +内镜下鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)在恶性梗阻性黄疸姑息性治疗中的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2018年12月至2020年1月在昆明医科大学第二附属医院诊治的68例恶性梗阻性黄疸患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男37例,女31例;年龄27~85岁,中位年龄63岁。根据减黄术式分为PTCD组(36例)与ERCP+ENBD组(32例)。观察两组患者的黄疸缓解率及围手术期情况等。两组住院时间、住院费用比较采用t检验,率的比较采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。

结果

两组患者治疗后黄疸、皮肤瘙痒临床症状及肝功能较术前均有所改善。PTCD组高位梗阻黄疸缓解率为91%(20/22),明显优于ERCP+ENBD组的50%(6/12) (χ2=7.222,P<0.05)。而ERCP+ENBD组低位梗阻黄疸缓解率为95%(18/19),明显优于PTCD组的64%(9/14) (χ2=5.024,P<0.05)。PTCD组与ERCP+ENBD组术后总并发症发生率分别为17%(6/36)、32%(10/31),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.228,P>0.05)。ERCP+ENBD组术后急性胰腺炎发生率为13%(4/31),明显高于PTCD组的0(P=0.026)。PTCD组住院时间和费用分别为(15.6±2.7)d、(2.5±0.4)万元,明显少于ERCP+ENBD组的(18.7±2.3)d、(2.7±0.3)万元(t=-5.140,-2.910;P<0.05)。

结论

PTCD与ERCP+ENBD在治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸方面均可获得有效的临床效果,PTCD更适用于高位梗阻患者,而ERCP+ENBD更适用于低位梗阻患者。两种术式各具优劣,需根据患者病情综合考虑选择,才能使患者切实受益。

Objective

To compare the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) + endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) in the palliative treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice.

Methods

Clinical data of 68 patients with malignant obstructive jaundice admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from December 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 37 patients were male and 31 female, aged from 27 to 85 years, with a median age of 63 years. All patients were divided into the PTCD (n=36) and ERCP+ENBD groups (n=32). The jaundice remission rate and perioperative conditions between two groups were observed. The length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense between two groups were compared by t test. The rate comparison was conducted by Chi-square test or Fisher's exact probability test.

Results

After treatments, the clinical symptoms of jaundice, skin itching and liver function of patients were improved in two groups. In the PTCD group, the remission rate of high-position obstructive jaundice was 91%(20/22), significantly higher than 50%(6/12) in the ERCP+ENBD group (χ2=7.222, P<0.05). In the ERCP+ENBD group, the remission rate of low-position obstructive jaundice was 95%(18/19), significantly higher compared with 64%(9/14) in the PTCD group (χ2=5.024, P<0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications in the PTCD and ERCP+ENBD groups were 17%(6/36) and 32%(10/31), respectively. No statistical significance was noted between two groups (χ2=2.228, P>0.05). In the ERCP+ENBD group, the incidence of postoperative acute pancreatitis was 13%(4/31), significantly higher compared with 0 in the PTCD group (P=0.026). In the PTCD group, the length of hospital stay and hospitalization expense were (15.6±2.7) d and (2.5±0.4)×104 yuan, significantly less than (18.7±2.3) d and (2.7±0.3)×104 yuan in the ERCP+ENBD group (t=-5.140, -2.910; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Both PTCD and ERCP+ENBD are effective treatments for malignant obstructive jaundice. PTCD is more suitable for patients with high-position obstructive jaundice, whereas ERCP+ENBD is recommended for those with low-position obstructive jaundice. Both operations have its own advantages and limitations. Conditions of the patients should be considered when making therapeutic option, which can only bring clinical benefits to the patients.

图1 一例恶性梗阻性黄疸患者超声引导下PTCD造影图注:示肝内胆管扩张
图2 一例恶性梗阻性黄疸患者ERCP+ENBD造影图注:示胆总管下段狭窄;ENBD为内镜下鼻胆管引流术
表1 PTCD和ERCP+ENBD组恶性梗阻性黄疸患者一般资料比较
表2 PTCD和ERCP+ENBD组恶性梗阻性黄疸患者围手术期肝功能比较(±s
表3 PTCD和ERCP+ENBD组恶性梗阻性黄疸患者术后并发症及满意度比较(例)
[1]
Parodi A, Fisher D, Giovannini M, et al. Endoscopic management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2012, 9(2):105-112.
[2]
吴刚. 经皮肝穿刺胆道支架置放术治疗恶性胆道梗阻性黄疸的临床疗效[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2017, 20(7):555-557.
[3]
Xu XJ, Li JJ, Wu J, et al. A systematic review and metaanalysis of intraluminal brachytherapy versus stent alone in the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice[J]. Cardiovasc Inter Radiol, 2018, 41(2):206-217.
[4]
金龙,邹英华. 梗阻性黄疸经皮肝穿刺胆道引流及支架植入术专家共识(2018)[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2019, 16(1):2-7.
[5]
Kikuyama M, Shirane N, Kawaguchi S, et al. New 14-mm diameter Niti-S biliary uncovered metal stent for unresectable distal biliary malignant obstruction[J]. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 2018, 10(1): 16-22.
[6]
Ignee A, Baum U, Schuessler G, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholangiography and cholangiodrainage (CEUS-PTCD)[J]. Endoscopy, 2009, 41(8):725-726.
[7]
Li TF, Ren KW, Han XW, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiobiopsy to determine the pathological cause of anastomotic stenosis after cholangiojejunostomy for malignant obstructive jaundice[J]. Clin Radiol, 2014, 69(1):13-17.
[8]
Pan H, Liang Z, Yin TS, et al. Hepato-biliary-enteric stent drainage as palliative treatment for proximal malignant obstructive jaundice[J]. Med Oncol, 2014, 31(3):853.
[9]
Pai M, Valek V, Tomas A, et al. Percutaneous intraductal radio frequency ablation for clearance of occluded metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction: feasibility and early results[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2014, 37(1):235-240.
[10]
马少军,翟仁友,赵峰. 恶性梗阻性黄疸的介入治疗进展[J/CD]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2016, 4(2):119-123.
[11]
孙英豪,徐红新,于洋, 等. 经皮穿刺胆道引流管及内支架置入治疗恶性阻塞性黄疸[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2010, 26(1):84-85.
[12]
赵诗葳,沈子贇,王建承, 等. 术前胆道引流方式对合并梗阻性黄疸病人胰十二指肠切除术的影响[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(4):301-305.
[13]
de Mestral C. Simple pharmacological prophylaxis for post-ERCP pancreatitis[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10035):2265-2266.
[14]
Druyts E, Thorlund K, Humphreys S, et al. Interpreting discordant indirect and multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: an evaluation of direct acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection[J]. Clin Epidemiol, 2013(5):173-183.
[15]
蒋孙路,黄强,翟东升. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和经皮肝穿刺胆道引流术治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的疗效对比[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2018, 24(1):75-79.
[16]
Cozzi G, Severini A, Civelli E, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in the management of postsurgical biliary leaks in patients with nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2006, 29(3):380-388.
[17]
Leng JJ, Zhang N, Dong JH. Percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction:a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2014, 12(1):272.
[18]
张东,陶杰,石磊等. 肝门部胆管癌根治术后并发症影响因素分析[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志20187(4):280-283.
[19]
Fortmeier D, Mastmeyer A, Schröder J, et al. A virtual reality system for PTCD simulation using direct visuo-haptic rendering of partially segmented image data[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2016, 20(1):355-366.
[20]
许俊,张秀芳,晁明, 等. 超声引导经皮肝胆道引流术治疗恶性胆道梗阻102例分析[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2004, 13(7): 30-32.
[21]
Piñol V, Castells A, Bordas JM, et al. Percutaneous self-expanding metal stents versus endoscopic polyethylene endoprostheses for treating malignant biliary obstruction: randomized clinical trial[J]. Radiology, 2002, 225(1):27-34.
[22]
Burke DR, Lewis CA, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2003, 14(9 Pt 2):S243-246.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 陈镁仪, 李伊尧, 张梦圆, 许杰, 马若凡, 李登, 顾菁. 图示化自主髋关节功能评分系统的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 320-328.
[3] 邵小丽, 林燕, 张玲玲, 韩亚琴. 超声引导下子宫肌瘤注射聚桂醇硬化术联合术后米非司酮治疗临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 353-360.
[4] 苏永涛, 王春雷, 徐广琪, 关中正, 焦伟, 隋颖. 胫骨骨膜牵张术联合富血小板血浆对治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 238-244.
[5] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[6] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[7] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[8] 鲁鑫, 杨琴, 许佳怡. 不同术式治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸疗效及对免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 180-183.
[9] 莫波, 王佩, 王恒, 何志军, 梁俊, 郝志楠. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与改良胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[10] 黄金鑫, 陈佳骏, 王旋, 曲岩, 张晞文, 李甫. ERCP在胆胰合流异常患者诊治中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 699-704.
[11] 滕达, 许悦, 张萌. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 537-542.
[12] 张天献, 吕云福, 郑进方. LC+LCBDE与ERCP/EST+LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石效果Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 45-50.
[13] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[14] 周军, 赵志明, 刘运锋, 唐兆伟, 宋常华, 刘杰, 李浩然, 吴绍光. 神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 86-92.
[15] 李琴, 莫伟, 周碧芳, 李玉莲, 阳秀春. 经皮肝穿刺胆道引流术后患者指南健康问题清单的构建[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 386-391.
阅读次数
全文


摘要