切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 579 -583. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.06.010

临床研究

肝癌破裂出血肝切除和介入治疗疗效比较及肝切除术后肝癌复发影响因素
郑文能1, 林楚芳2, 林庆斌1, 林文斌1,()   
  1. 1. 363000 福建省漳州市,解放军联勤保障部队第909医院急诊科
    2. 363000 福建省漳州市,解放军联勤保障部队第909医院消化内科
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-19 出版日期:2021-09-23
  • 通信作者: 林文斌
  • 基金资助:
    中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第909医院青年苗圃基金(18Y030)

Comparison of efficacy between hepatectomy and interventional therapy for liver cancer rupture and bleeding and influencing factors of tumor recurrence after hepatectomy

Wenneng Zheng1, Chufang Lin2, Qingbin Lin1, Wenbin Lin1,()   

  1. 1. Emergency Department, No.909 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Zhangzhou 363000, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, No.909 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force, Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2021-07-19 Published:2021-09-23
  • Corresponding author: Wenbin Lin
引用本文:

郑文能, 林楚芳, 林庆斌, 林文斌. 肝癌破裂出血肝切除和介入治疗疗效比较及肝切除术后肝癌复发影响因素[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 579-583.

Wenneng Zheng, Chufang Lin, Qingbin Lin, Wenbin Lin. Comparison of efficacy between hepatectomy and interventional therapy for liver cancer rupture and bleeding and influencing factors of tumor recurrence after hepatectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(06): 579-583.

目的

比较肝切除和介入治疗肝癌破裂出血的疗效,并探讨肝切除术后肿瘤复发的影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析2006年1月1日至2015年12月1日解放军联勤保障部队第909医院收治的92例肝癌破裂出血患者临床资料。其中男59例,女33例;年龄29~74岁,中位年龄46岁。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。根据治疗方法不同分为肝切除组(52例)和介入组(40例),比较两组患者术后生存和肿瘤复发情况。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Log-rank检验。等待手术时间与患者生存、复发时间的相关性分析采用线性相关分析。多因素分析采用Cox比例风险回归模型。

结果

肝切除组术后1、3、5年累积生存率分别为90.38%、55.77%、13.46%,介入组相应为90.00%、25.00%、10.00%,肝切除组术后生存优于介入组(χ2=4.334,P<0.05)。肝切除组术后1、3年肿瘤复发率为21.15%、78.84%,介入组相应为27.50%、85.00%,肝切除组术后肿瘤复发率明显低于介入组(χ2=3.899,P<0.05)。等待手术时间与患者术后生存、肿瘤复发时间成负相关(r=-0.720,-0.784;P<0.05)。多因素分析结果显示,等待手术时间、肿瘤分化、微血管侵犯是肝癌破裂出血患者术后肿瘤复发的独立影响因素(HR=0.937,0.113,12.934;P<0.05)。

结论

肝癌破裂出血患者采用手术切除效果优于介入治疗,等待手术时间、肿瘤分化、微血管侵犯是肝切除患者术后肿瘤复发的独立影响因素,尽早手术切除能降低肿瘤复发率,提高生存率。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of hepatectomy and interventional therapy for liver cancer rupture and bleeding, and to explore the influencing factors of tumor recurrence after hepatectomy.

Methods

Clinical data of 92 patients with liver cancer rupture and bleeding admitted to No.909 Hospital of the PLA Joint Logistics Support Force from January 1, 2006 to December 1, 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 59 patients were male and 33 female, aged from 29 to 74 years, with a median age of 46 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different treatment methods, all patients were divided into the hepatectomy (n=52) and interventional therapy groups (n=40). Postoperative survival and tumor recurrence were compared between two groups. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method andLog-rank test. The correlation analysis of waiting time for surgery with survival time, recurrence time was conducted by using linear correlation analysis. Multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results

In the hepatectomy group, the 1-, 3-, 5-year cumulative survival rates were 90.38%, 55.77%, 13.46%, and 90.00%, 25.00%, 10.00% in the interventional group. The postoperative survival in the hepatectomy group was better than that in the interventional group (χ2=4.334, P<0.05). In the hepatectomy group, the 1-, 3-year tumor recurrence rates were 21.15%, 78.84%, and were 27.50%, 85.00% in the interventional group. The tumor recurrence rate in the hepatectomy group was significantly lower than that in the interventional group (χ2=3.899, P<0.05). The waiting time for surgery was negatively correlated with the postoperative survival and tumor recurrence time (r=-0.720, -0.784; P<0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that waiting time for surgery, tumor differentiation and microvascular invasion were the independent influencing factors for the postoperative tumor recurrence in patients with liver cancer rupture and bleeding (HR=0.937, 0.113, 12.934; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Hepatectomy yields better efficacy than interventional therapy for patients with rupture and bleeding of liver cancer. Waiting time for surgery, tumor differentiation and microvascular invasion are the independent influencing factors of postoperative tumor recurrence. Early surgical resection can lower the tumor recurrence rate and increase the survival rate.

表1 肝切除组和介入组肝癌破裂出血患者一般资料比较(例)
图1 肝切除组和介入组肝癌破裂出血患者术后生存和肿瘤复发Kaplan-Meier曲线
图2 肝癌破裂出血患者等待手术时间与术后生存、肿瘤复发时间的关系
表2 肝癌破裂出血患者肝切除术后肿瘤复发的Cox多因素分析
[1]
Buettner S, van Vugt JL, IJzermans JN, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: current perspectives[J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2017(10):1131-1142.
[2]
Sahu SK, Chawla YK, Dhiman RK, et al. Rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of literature[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2019, 9(2): 245-256.
[3]
Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, et al. Spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Hepatol Res, 2016, 46(1):13-21.
[4]
Ren A, Luo S, Ji L, et al. Peritoneal metastasis after emergency hepatectomy and delayed hepatectomy for spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Asian J Surg, 2019, 42(2):464-469.
[5]
Zhu Q, Qiao GL, Xu C, et al. Partial hepatectomy for spontaneous tumor rupture in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2017(9):525-537.
[6]
Zhong F, Cheng XS, He K, et al. Treatment outcomes of spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma with hemorrhagic shock:a multicenter study[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5(1):1101.
[7]
Bertacco A, D'Amico F, Romano M, et al. Liver radiofrequency ablation as emergency treatment for a ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2017, 11(1):54.
[8]
尹兵,麻勇. 肝癌破裂相关急腹症的诊治体会[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2020, 47(10):649-654.
[9]
李清汉,甄作均,陈应军, 等. 肝细胞癌破裂出血的治疗[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 9(3):260-263.
[10]
孔杰,孙智勇,时文馨, 等. 隐匿型破裂的肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2020, 26(3):170-172.
[11]
Zhou C, Zu Q, Wang B, et al. Efficacy and prognostic factors of transarterial embolization as initial treatment for spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center retrospective analysis in 57 patients[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2019, 37(3):255-263.
[12]
Wakayama K, Kamiyama T, Yokoo H, et al. Huge hepatocellular carcinoma greater than 10 cm in diameter worsens prognosis by causing distant recurrence after curative resection[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2017, 115(3):324-329.
[13]
Plahuta I, Jelenko M, Potrč S, et al. Abandonment of surveillance, followed by emergency surgery for a second spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature[J]. Clin Case Rep, 2019, 7(4):789-796.
[14]
Guo P, Pi C, Zhao S, et al. Oral co-delivery nanoemulsion of 5-fluorouracil and curcumin for synergistic effects against liver cancer[J]. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2020, 17(10):1473-1484.
[15]
Ueno M. Nanoliposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil and folinic acid, as a new option for second-line treatment in metastatic pancreatic cancer[J]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2020, 47(6): 955-962.
[16]
Fushida S, Kinoshita J, Oyama K, et al. Multidisciplinary therapy for scirrhous gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis and proposal of new treatment strategy[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2018(10):3833-3839.
[17]
Göksu M, Alakuş H, Ertan S, et al. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on colon anastomosis in rats in which hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy was performed using 5-fluorouracil[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2020, 90(11):2290-2297.
[18]
杨先模,闫挺,任翱, 等. 急诊与延期肝切除对可切除性肝癌破裂出血患者腹腔转移的影响[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2017, 23(4): 225-229.
[19]
中国抗癌协会肝癌专业委员会. 中国肝癌多学科综合治疗专家共识[J/CD]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2020, 12(12):28-36.
[20]
Thomas AJ, Mentias CO, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Bleeding liver masses: imaging features with pathologic correlation and impact on management[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2019, 213(1):8-16.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[4] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[5] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[6] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[9] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[10] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[11] 焦振东, 惠鹏, 金上博. 三维可视化结合ICG显像技术在腹腔镜肝切除术治疗复发性肝癌中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[12] 张润锦, 阳盼, 林燕斯, 刘尊龙, 刘建平, 金小岩. EB病毒相关胆管癌伴多发转移一例及国内文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 865-869.
[13] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?