切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06) : 584 -588. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2021.06.011

临床研究

保留供肝胃十二指肠动脉对肝移植术后胆道并发症的影响
陈焕伟1,†(), 刘颖1, 廖珊2, 邓斐文1, 王峰杰1   
  1. 1. 528000　广东省佛山市第一人民医院肝脏外科
    2. 528000　广东省佛山市第一人民医院统计室
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-20 出版日期:2021-09-23
  • 通信作者: 陈焕伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省基础与应用基础研究基金联合基金重大项目(2020B1515120031); 佛山市登峰计划器官移植技术创新平台项目基金(2020A007)

Effect of preserving gastroduodenal artery of liver graft on biliary complications after liver transplantation

Huanwei Chen1,†(), Ying Liu1, Shan Liao2, Feiwen Deng1, Fengjie Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
    2. Statistics Office, the First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
  • Received:2021-07-20 Published:2021-09-23
  • Corresponding author: Huanwei Chen
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

陈焕伟, 刘颖, 廖珊, 邓斐文, 王峰杰. 保留供肝胃十二指肠动脉对肝移植术后胆道并发症的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2021, 10(06): 584-588.

Huanwei Chen, Ying Liu, Shan Liao, Feiwen Deng, Fengjie Wang. Effect of preserving gastroduodenal artery of liver graft on biliary complications after liver transplantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 10(06): 584-588.

目的

探讨保留供肝胃十二指肠动脉的改良供肝修剪方法对肝移植受者术后胆道并发症的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2011年9月至2019年11月在佛山市第一人民医院行原位肝移植的129例受者临床资料。其中男120例，女9例；年龄31~71岁，中位年龄50岁。受者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。根据供肝修剪方法，将受者分为改良组（56例）和常规组（73例）。改良组技术要点是保留胃十二指肠动脉远端至少2 cm，特别注意保留胰十二指肠上动脉后支以及变异的肝右动脉，以保证胆总管远端血供。观察两组肝移植围手术期情况。两组手术时间比较采用t检验，术后住院时间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验，术后胆道并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

改良组平均手术时间为（7.4±1.2）h，明显少于常规组的（8.0±1.3）h（t=-2.524，P<0.05）。改良组术后住院时间分别为16（14）d，明显少于常规组的22（11）d（Z=2.970，P<0.05）。改良组术后胆道并发症发生率为5%（3/56），明显低于常规组的21%（15/73） （χ2=6.091，P<0.05）。

结论

保留供肝胃十二指肠动脉的改良修肝方法可保持胰十二指肠上后动脉及周围组织的完整性，有利于保护肝外胆管的血供，降低肝外胆管缺血所导致的肝移植术后胆道并发症发生率。

关键词: 肝移植, 胆道并发症, 活体供者, 胃十二指肠动脉
Objective

To evaluate the effect of modified liver graft repairing method, preserving the gastroduodenal artery of graft on the biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Methods

Clinical data of 129 recipients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation in the First People's Hospital of Foshan from September 2011 to November 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 120 patients were male and9 female, aged from 31 to 71 years, with a median age of 50 years. The informed consents of all recipients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. According to different liver graft repairing methods, all recipients were divided into the modified group (n=56) and conventional group (n=73). In the modified group, at least 2 cm of the distal end of gastroduodenal artery was reserved, especially the posterior branch of superior pancreaticoduodenal artery and the variant right hepatic artery, to guarantee the distal blood supply of common bile duct. Perioperative conditions of the recipients were observed intwo groups. The operation time between two groups was compared by t test. The length of postoperative hospital stay was compared by Mann-Whitney U test. The incidence of postoperative biliary complications was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

The average operation time in the modified group was (7.4±1.2) h, significantly shorter than (8.0±1.3) h in the conventional group (t=-2.524, P<0.05). The length of postoperative hospital stay in the modified group was 16(14) d, significantly shorter than 22(11) d in the conventional group (Z=2.970, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative biliary complications in the modified group was 5%(3/56), significantly lower than 21%(15/73) in the conventional group (χ2=6.091, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The modified liver graft repairing method with reserved gastroduodenal artery can maintain the integrity of the superior posterior pancreaticoduodenal artery and its surrounding tissues, which is beneficial to protect the blood supply of extrahepatic bile duct and reduce the incidence of biliary complications caused by extrahepatic bile duct ischemia after liver transplantation.

Key words: Liver transplantation, Biliary complication, Living donors, Gastroduodenal artery
表1 改良组和常规组肝移植受者一般资料比较
组别 例数 年龄（岁，±s） 性别（男/女，例） BMI（kg/m2，±s） MELD评分[分，M（QR）] 原发病（例）
肝炎后肝硬化 原发性肝癌 酒精性肝硬化 免疫性肝病 肝豆状核变性 多囊肝
改良组 56 52±10 50/6 24±4 12(17) 22 32 1 1 0 0
常规组 73 49±9 70/3 23±3 12(11) 37 28 5 1 1 1
统计值   t=1.786 χ2=1.234 t=0.872 Z=0.131 -
P值   0.076 0.267 0.385 0.896 0.275
表2 改良组和常规组肝移植受者手术情况比较
组别 例数 手术时间（h，±s） 热缺血时间[min，M（QR）] 冷缺血时间[h，M（QR）] 无肝期时间（min，±s） 第二热缺血时间[min，M（QR）] 术中出血量[ml，M（QR）]
改良组 56 7.4±1.2 0（5） 5.0（2.3） 61±11 60（34） 3 100（3 200）
常规组 73 8.0±1.3 0（6） 5.0（1.9） 63±14 59（47） 4 000（4 250）
统计值   t=-2.524 Z=-1.492 Z=0.660 t=-0.762 Z=0.378 Z=-1.241
P值   0.013 0.136 0.509 0.448 0.706 0.214
[1]
Kochhar G, Parungao JM, Hanouneh IA, et al. Biliary complications following liver transplantation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(19):2841-2846.
[2]
Kienlein S, Schoening W, Andert A, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: impact of anastomotic technique and ischemic time on short- and long-term outcome[J]. World J Transplant, 2015, 5(4):300-309.
[3]
Mejía GA, Olarte-Parra C, Pedraza A, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: incidence, risk factors and impact on patient and graft survival[J]. Transplant Proc, 2016, 48(2):665-668.
[4]
霍胜军，范松青，谭善彰. 肝外胆管供血动脉在临床肝移植的应用解剖研究[J]. 中华器官移植杂志, 2005, 26(2):103-104.
[5]
Nemes B, Gámán G, Doros A. Biliary complications after liver transplantation[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 9(4):447-466.
[6]
李弦，范林，李玲, 等. 肝移植术后胆道并发症的病因、诊断及治疗[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2013, 19(6):469-472.
[7]
Londoño MC, Balderramo D, Cárdenas A. Management of biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: the role of endoscopy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14(4):493-497.
[8]
蔡云石，刘雄威，肖衡, 等. 肝移植术后胆道并发症的诊治[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2018, 7(5):391-395.
[9]
Thuluvath PJ, Pfau PR, Kimmey MB, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation: the role of endoscopy[J]. Endoscopy, 2005, 37(9):857-863.
[10]
Sharma S, Gurakar A, Jabbour N. Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: past, present and preventive strategies[J]. Liver Transpl, 2008, 14(6):759-769.
[11]
Jay CL, Lyuksemburg V, Ladner DP, et al. Ischemic cholangiopathy after controlled donation after cardiac death liver transplantation:a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(2):259-264.
[12]
O'Neill S, Roebuck A, Khoo E, et al. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes including biliary complications in donation after cardiac death liver transplantation[J]. Transpl Int, 2014, 27(11): 1159-1174.
[13]
Detry O, Donckier V, Lucidi V, et al. Liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: initial Belgian experience2003-2007[J]. Transpl Int, 2010, 23(6):611-618.
[14]
DeOliveira ML, Jassem W, Valente R, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation using grafts from donors after cardiac death: results from a matched control study in a single large volume center[J]. Ann Surg, 2011, 254(5):716-722.
[15]
Frongillo F, Lirosi MC, Sganga G, et al. Graft steatosis as a risk factor of ischemic-type biliary lesions in liver transplantation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(7):2293-2294.
[16]
Axelrod DA, Dzebisashvili N, Lentine KL, et al. Variation in biliary complication rates following liver transplantation: implications for cost and outcome[J]. Am J Transplant, 2015, 15(1):170-179.
[17]
de Vera ME, Lopez-Solis R, Dvorchik I, et al. Liver transplantation using donation after cardiac death donors: long-term follow up from a single center[J]. Am J Transplant, 2009, 9(4):773-781.
[18]
Guichelaar MM, Benson JT, Malinchoc M, et al. Risk factors for and clinical course of non-anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation[J]. Am J Transplant, 2003, 3(7):885-890.
[19]
Chan EY, Olson LC, Kisthard JA, et al. Ischemic cholangiopathy following liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors[J]. Liver Transpl, 2008, 14(5):604-610.
[20]
傅斌生，易述红，唐晖, 等. 公民逝世后器官捐献肝移植术后胆道并发症供者相关危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2016, 5(4):235-239.
[21]
Chen CL, Concejero AM, Lin TS, et al. Outcome of routine use of microsurgical biliary reconstruction in pediatric living donor liver transplantation[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2013, 20(5):492-497.
[22]
黄洁夫，梁力建，汪谦, 等. 普通外科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2001:1638-1639.
[1] . 肝移植治疗终末期肝病[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 1-.
[2] 李坤河, 寇萌佳, 邝立挺. 肝移植术后二次气管插管的危险因素及预测模型的建立[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 366-371.
[3] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 上海医药行业协会. 中国肝、肾移植受者霉酚酸类药物应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 257-272.
[4] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[5] 范铁艳, 李君, 陈虹. 肝移植术后新发戊型病毒性肝炎的诊治经验[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 293-296.
[6] 陈朔, 陈峰, 程飞, 项捷. 糖原累积病Ⅰ型并发胰腺炎肝移植术后胰腺梗死一例[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 300-302.
[7] 汤鹏昊, 张武. 肠道微生态与肝移植围手术期并发症相关研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 303-307.
[8] 祝丽娜, 杨子祯, 张迪, 张勇, 蔡金贞, 王建红. 超声造影在肝移植术后肝动脉并发症中的应用价值[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 240-245.
[9] 中国器官移植发展基金会器官移植受者健康管理专家委员会, 中国医师协会器官移植医师分会, 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 国家肝脏移植质控中心. 肝移植受者雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂临床应用中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 193-204.
[10] 严庆, 刘颖, 邓斐文, 陈焕伟. 微血管侵犯对肝癌肝移植患者生存预后的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 624-629.
[11] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[12] 李秉林, 吕少诚, 潘飞, 姜涛, 樊华, 寇建涛, 贺强, 郎韧. 供肝灌注液病原菌与肝移植术后早期感染的相关性分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 656-660.
[13] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[14] 王孟龙. 肿瘤生物学特征在肝癌肝移植治疗中的意义[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 490-494.
[15] 王晓东, 汪恺, 葛昭, 丁忠祥, 徐骁. 计算机视觉技术在肝癌肝移植疗效提升中的研究进展[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 361-366.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号