切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.01.006

临床研究

门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式单中心经验
王栋1, 阴继凯1, 董瑞1, 鲁建国1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学附属唐都医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-18 出版日期:2022-02-10
  • 通信作者: 鲁建国
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81700533); 陕西省重点研发计划(2017SF-116); 陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(2015KTCL03-05,2015JM8420); 唐都医院创新发展基金(2017LCYJ003,2018JSYJ010,2019LCYJ005)

Full-process management of minimally invasive surgery for portal hypertension: single-center experience

Dong Wang1, Jikai Yin1, Rui Dong1, Jianguo Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University, Xi 'an 710038, China
  • Received:2021-10-18 Published:2022-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Jianguo Lu
引用本文:

王栋, 阴继凯, 董瑞, 鲁建国. 门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式单中心经验[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 21-26.

Dong Wang, Jikai Yin, Rui Dong, Jianguo Lu. Full-process management of minimally invasive surgery for portal hypertension: single-center experience[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(01): 21-26.

目的

探讨以腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术(断流术)为中心的门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2018年12月在空军军医大学附属唐都医院行断流术的263例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男159例,女104例;年龄17~77岁,中位年龄46岁。根据管理模式不同,将患者分为新模式组(129例)和对照组(134例)。新模式组采用以腹腔镜断流术为中心的微创手术全程管理。对照组采用以开腹断流术为中心的传统围手术期管理模式。观察两组围手术期情况和并发症情况。两组围手术期指标比较采用秩和检验或t检验,并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

新模式组术中出血量为562(500)ml,明显少于对照组的1 405(900)ml(Z=-9.472,P<0.05);引流管留置时间及术后住院时间分别为(4.2±2.3)、(7.7±3.0)d,亦明显少于对照组的(6.3±2.7)、(9.6±2.9)d(t= -6.778,-5.223;P<0.05)。新模式组术后3 d的AST、TB分别为33(17)U/L、24(13)μmol/L,明显少于对照组的41(21)U/L、40(22)μmol/L(Z=-2.708,-4.775;P<0.05);PT为(13.5±1.5)s,亦明显少于对照组的(16.3±2.8)s (t=-8.594,P<0.05)。新模式组术后严重并发症发生率为15%(19/129),明显低于对照组的51%(68/134) (χ2=38.520,P<0.05)。

结论

以腹腔镜断流术为中心的门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式是安全、有效的,可保证患者围手术期安全、降低手术并发症及促进患者快速康复。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of the full-process management of minimally invasive surgery, primarily laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization (devascularization), for portal hypertension.

Methods

Clinical data of 263 patients with cirrhosis complicated with portal hypertension undergoing devascularization in Tangdu Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University from January 2009 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 159 patients were male and 104 female, aged 17-77 years with a median age of 46 years. According to different managements, all the patients were divided into the new mode group (n=129) and control group (n=134). In the new mode group, the full-process surgery management of laparoscopic devascularization was adopted. In the control group, traditional perioperative management of open devascularization was performed. Perioperative conditions and complications were observed between two groups. Perioperative conditions were statistically compared between two groups by rank-sum test or t test. The incidence of complications was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

In the new mode group, intraoperative blood loss was 562(500) ml, significantly less than 1 405(900) ml in the control group (Z=-9.472, P<0.05); The indwelling time of drainage tube and length of postoperative hospital stay were (4.2±2.3) d and (7.7±3.0) d, significantly shorter than (6.3±2.7) d and (9.6±2.9) d in the control group (t=-6.778, -5.223; P<0.05). In the new mode group, the AST and TB levels at postoperative 3 d were 33(17) U/L and 24(13) μmol/L, significantly lower than 41(21) U/L and 40(22) μmol/L in the control group (Z=-2.708, -4.775; P<0.05); PT was (13.5±1.5) s, significantly shorter than (16.3±2.8) s in the control group (t=-8.594, P<0.05). The incidence of severe postoperative complications in the new mode group was 15%(19/129), significantly lower compared with 51%(68/134) in the control group (χ2=38.520, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The full-process management of minimally invasive surgery, mainly laparoscopic devascularization, is safe and efficacious for portal hypertension, which can guarantee the perioperative safety, reduce the risk of surgical complications and accelerate recovery of patients.

图1 一例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术手术过程注:a为五孔法Trocar布孔位置;b为胰腺上缘分离脾动脉相对游离段并结扎;c为血管切割闭合器离断脾蒂;d为血管切割闭合器离断胃冠状血管主干;e为打开双侧膈肌脚,充分游离裸化食管下段;f为脾窝放置引流管自左下腹引出
表1 新模式组和对照组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术前一般资料比较
表2 新模式组和对照组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者围手术期情况比较
表3 新模式组和对照组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术后严重并发症情况比较(例)
[1]
Brunner F, Berzigotti A, Bosch J.Prevention and treatment of variceal haemorrhage in 2017[J].Liver Int,2017,37Suppl 1:104-115.
[2]
Simonetto DA, Liu M, Kamath PS.Portal hypertension and related complications: diagnosis and management[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2019,94(4):714-726.
[3]
杨镇,裘法祖. 脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的疗效[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2000, 38(9):645-648.
[4]
蒋国庆,柏斗胜,钱建军, 等. 腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症临床疗效分析(附425例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(12):1136-1141.
[5]
许丁伟,孙敏,吴敏, 等. 腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的团队协作与技巧[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(8):611-615.
[6]
邬杰忠,黄河,熊志勇, 等. 脾动脉先行的五步法腹腔镜脾切除治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症巨脾患者的安全性及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 9(6):587-591.
[7]
鲁建国,阴继凯,董瑞, 等. 腹腔镜断流术个体化手术设计与围手术期管理[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 8(5): 388-391.
[8]
鲁建国,阴继凯,王栋. 全腹腔镜下脾脏切除联合断流术的综合评估与手术技术经验[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2021, 27(1):8-11.
[9]
Pei Y, Chai S, Zhang Y,et al.Benefits of splenectomy and curative treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension: a retrospective study[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2019,23(11):2151-2162.
[10]
Pei Y, Zhang Z, Mba'Nbo-Koumpa AA,et al.Improved survival following splenectomy combined with curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in Child B patients: a propensity score matching study[J].Hepatol Res,2019,49(2):177-188.
[11]
Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Nagao Y,et al.Customization of laparoscopic gastric devascularization and splenectomy for gastric varices based on CT vascular anatomy[J].Surg Endosc,2018,32(1):114-126.
[12]
Casaccia M, Sormani MP, Palombo D,et al.Laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy in massive and giant spleens: should we update the 2008 EAES Guidelines?[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2019,29(3):178-181.
[13]
Tsamalaidze L, Stauffer JA, Permenter SL,et al.Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: does size matter?[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2017,27(10):1009-1014.
[14]
刘连新,陈亚进,曹铭辉, 等. 腹腔镜肝切除术加速康复外科中国专家共识(2017版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(5):517-524.
[15]
白雪莉,梁廷波. 肝胆胰外科术后加速康复专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(1):1-6.
[16]
Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH, Tripodi A.Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis[J].Gastroenterology,2019,156(6):1582-1599.
[17]
Bai DS, Xia BL, Zhang C,et al.Warfarin versus aspirin prevents portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a randomized clinical trial[J].Int J Surg,2019(64):16-23.
[18]
Vecchio R, Cacciola E, Cacciola RR,et al.Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic and open splenectomy[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2011,21(1):71-75.
[19]
Noronha FC, Reis D, Cortez-Pinto H,et al.Anticoagulation in cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis is safe and improves prognosis in advanced cirrhosis[J].Dig Dis Sci,2019,64(9):2671-2683.
[20]
钟平勇,王杰,牟廷刚, 等. 预防性抗凝治疗对腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后门静脉血栓形成的效果[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2020, 35(4):281-283.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?