切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2022.01.006

临床研究

门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式单中心经验
王栋1, 阴继凯1, 董瑞1, 鲁建国1,()   
  1. 1. 710038 西安,空军军医大学附属唐都医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-18 出版日期:2022-02-10
  • 通信作者: 鲁建国
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81700533); 陕西省重点研发计划(2017SF-116); 陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目(2015KTCL03-05,2015JM8420); 唐都医院创新发展基金(2017LCYJ003,2018JSYJ010,2019LCYJ005)

Full-process management of minimally invasive surgery for portal hypertension: single-center experience

Dong Wang1, Jikai Yin1, Rui Dong1, Jianguo Lu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Tangdu Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University, Xi 'an 710038, China
  • Received:2021-10-18 Published:2022-02-10
  • Corresponding author: Jianguo Lu
引用本文:

王栋, 阴继凯, 董瑞, 鲁建国. 门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式单中心经验[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(01): 21-26.

Dong Wang, Jikai Yin, Rui Dong, Jianguo Lu. Full-process management of minimally invasive surgery for portal hypertension: single-center experience[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 11(01): 21-26.

目的

探讨以腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术(断流术)为中心的门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式的应用价值。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2018年12月在空军军医大学附属唐都医院行断流术的263例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男159例,女104例;年龄17~77岁,中位年龄46岁。根据管理模式不同,将患者分为新模式组(129例)和对照组(134例)。新模式组采用以腹腔镜断流术为中心的微创手术全程管理。对照组采用以开腹断流术为中心的传统围手术期管理模式。观察两组围手术期情况和并发症情况。两组围手术期指标比较采用秩和检验或t检验,并发症发生率比较采用χ2检验。

结果

新模式组术中出血量为562(500)ml,明显少于对照组的1 405(900)ml(Z=-9.472,P<0.05);引流管留置时间及术后住院时间分别为(4.2±2.3)、(7.7±3.0)d,亦明显少于对照组的(6.3±2.7)、(9.6±2.9)d(t= -6.778,-5.223;P<0.05)。新模式组术后3 d的AST、TB分别为33(17)U/L、24(13)μmol/L,明显少于对照组的41(21)U/L、40(22)μmol/L(Z=-2.708,-4.775;P<0.05);PT为(13.5±1.5)s,亦明显少于对照组的(16.3±2.8)s (t=-8.594,P<0.05)。新模式组术后严重并发症发生率为15%(19/129),明显低于对照组的51%(68/134) (χ2=38.520,P<0.05)。

结论

以腹腔镜断流术为中心的门静脉高压症微创手术全程管理模式是安全、有效的,可保证患者围手术期安全、降低手术并发症及促进患者快速康复。

Objective

To evaluate the application value of the full-process management of minimally invasive surgery, primarily laparoscopic splenectomy combined with pericardial devascularization (devascularization), for portal hypertension.

Methods

Clinical data of 263 patients with cirrhosis complicated with portal hypertension undergoing devascularization in Tangdu Hospital Affiliated to Air Force Medical University from January 2009 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 159 patients were male and 104 female, aged 17-77 years with a median age of 46 years. According to different managements, all the patients were divided into the new mode group (n=129) and control group (n=134). In the new mode group, the full-process surgery management of laparoscopic devascularization was adopted. In the control group, traditional perioperative management of open devascularization was performed. Perioperative conditions and complications were observed between two groups. Perioperative conditions were statistically compared between two groups by rank-sum test or t test. The incidence of complications was compared by Chi-square test.

Results

In the new mode group, intraoperative blood loss was 562(500) ml, significantly less than 1 405(900) ml in the control group (Z=-9.472, P<0.05); The indwelling time of drainage tube and length of postoperative hospital stay were (4.2±2.3) d and (7.7±3.0) d, significantly shorter than (6.3±2.7) d and (9.6±2.9) d in the control group (t=-6.778, -5.223; P<0.05). In the new mode group, the AST and TB levels at postoperative 3 d were 33(17) U/L and 24(13) μmol/L, significantly lower than 41(21) U/L and 40(22) μmol/L in the control group (Z=-2.708, -4.775; P<0.05); PT was (13.5±1.5) s, significantly shorter than (16.3±2.8) s in the control group (t=-8.594, P<0.05). The incidence of severe postoperative complications in the new mode group was 15%(19/129), significantly lower compared with 51%(68/134) in the control group (χ2=38.520, P<0.05).

Conclusions

The full-process management of minimally invasive surgery, mainly laparoscopic devascularization, is safe and efficacious for portal hypertension, which can guarantee the perioperative safety, reduce the risk of surgical complications and accelerate recovery of patients.

图1 一例肝硬化门静脉高压症患者腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术手术过程注:a为五孔法Trocar布孔位置;b为胰腺上缘分离脾动脉相对游离段并结扎;c为血管切割闭合器离断脾蒂;d为血管切割闭合器离断胃冠状血管主干;e为打开双侧膈肌脚,充分游离裸化食管下段;f为脾窝放置引流管自左下腹引出
表1 新模式组和对照组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术前一般资料比较
表2 新模式组和对照组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者围手术期情况比较
表3 新模式组和对照组肝硬化门静脉高压症患者术后严重并发症情况比较(例)
[1]
Brunner F, Berzigotti A, Bosch J.Prevention and treatment of variceal haemorrhage in 2017[J].Liver Int,2017,37Suppl 1:104-115.
[2]
Simonetto DA, Liu M, Kamath PS.Portal hypertension and related complications: diagnosis and management[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2019,94(4):714-726.
[3]
杨镇,裘法祖. 脾切除贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的疗效[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2000, 38(9):645-648.
[4]
蒋国庆,柏斗胜,钱建军, 等. 腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症临床疗效分析(附425例报告)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(12):1136-1141.
[5]
许丁伟,孙敏,吴敏, 等. 腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的团队协作与技巧[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2019, 25(8):611-615.
[6]
邬杰忠,黄河,熊志勇, 等. 脾动脉先行的五步法腹腔镜脾切除治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症巨脾患者的安全性及疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2020, 9(6):587-591.
[7]
鲁建国,阴继凯,董瑞, 等. 腹腔镜断流术个体化手术设计与围手术期管理[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2019, 8(5): 388-391.
[8]
鲁建国,阴继凯,王栋. 全腹腔镜下脾脏切除联合断流术的综合评估与手术技术经验[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2021, 27(1):8-11.
[9]
Pei Y, Chai S, Zhang Y,et al.Benefits of splenectomy and curative treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension: a retrospective study[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2019,23(11):2151-2162.
[10]
Pei Y, Zhang Z, Mba'Nbo-Koumpa AA,et al.Improved survival following splenectomy combined with curative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in Child B patients: a propensity score matching study[J].Hepatol Res,2019,49(2):177-188.
[11]
Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Nagao Y,et al.Customization of laparoscopic gastric devascularization and splenectomy for gastric varices based on CT vascular anatomy[J].Surg Endosc,2018,32(1):114-126.
[12]
Casaccia M, Sormani MP, Palombo D,et al.Laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy in massive and giant spleens: should we update the 2008 EAES Guidelines?[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2019,29(3):178-181.
[13]
Tsamalaidze L, Stauffer JA, Permenter SL,et al.Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: does size matter?[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2017,27(10):1009-1014.
[14]
刘连新,陈亚进,曹铭辉, 等. 腹腔镜肝切除术加速康复外科中国专家共识(2017版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(5):517-524.
[15]
白雪莉,梁廷波. 肝胆胰外科术后加速康复专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(1):1-6.
[16]
Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH, Tripodi A.Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis[J].Gastroenterology,2019,156(6):1582-1599.
[17]
Bai DS, Xia BL, Zhang C,et al.Warfarin versus aspirin prevents portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a randomized clinical trial[J].Int J Surg,2019(64):16-23.
[18]
Vecchio R, Cacciola E, Cacciola RR,et al.Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic and open splenectomy[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2011,21(1):71-75.
[19]
Noronha FC, Reis D, Cortez-Pinto H,et al.Anticoagulation in cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis is safe and improves prognosis in advanced cirrhosis[J].Dig Dis Sci,2019,64(9):2671-2683.
[20]
钟平勇,王杰,牟廷刚, 等. 预防性抗凝治疗对腹腔镜脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术后门静脉血栓形成的效果[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2020, 35(4):281-283.
[1] 代莉, 邓恢伟, 郭华静, 黄芙蓉. 术中持续输注艾司氯胺酮对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术患者术后睡眠质量的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 408-412.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[8] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[9] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[10] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[11] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[12] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[13] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[14] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要