切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 211 -215. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.02.017

临床研究

血栓弹力图测定对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除术后出血的预测价值
李杰1, 任加强1, 马坚1, 王铮1, 马清涌1, 仵正1,†()   
  1. 1. 710061　西安交通大学第一附属医院肝胆外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-16 出版日期:2023-03-28
  • 通信作者: 仵正
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省创新能力支撑计划(2022PT-35); 陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2020JQ-510); 西安交通大学第一附属医院科研发展基金(2021QN-24)

Predictive value of thromboelastography in bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma

Jie Li1, Jiaqiang Ren1, Jian Ma1, Zheng Wang1, Qingyong Ma1, Zheng Wu1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
  • Received:2022-11-16 Published:2023-03-28
  • Corresponding author: Zheng Wu
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

李杰, 任加强, 马坚, 王铮, 马清涌, 仵正. 血栓弹力图测定对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除术后出血的预测价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 211-215.

Jie Li, Jiaqiang Ren, Jian Ma, Zheng Wang, Qingyong Ma, Zheng Wu. Predictive value of thromboelastography in bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(02): 211-215.

目的

探讨远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除术（PD）术后出血患者的临床特点及血栓弹力图（TEG）对术后出血的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年8月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行PD的162例远端胆管癌患者临床资料。其中男100例，女62例；年龄39~78岁，中位年龄64岁。患者均签署知情同意书，符合医学伦理学规定。根据患者是否发生术后出血分为出血组（29例）和未出血组（133例）。两组围手术期情况比较采用秩和检验或χ2检验。将患者肿瘤标志物、凝血功能和TEG相关指标纳入术后出血影响因素分析，采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析术后出血的独立影响因素；建立Logistic回归模型，采用ROC曲线判断该模型的预测价值。

结果

出血组患者术后发生胰瘘、胃排空障碍、90 d死亡分别为19、25、5例，未出血组分别为79、57、3例，差异有统计学意义（χ2=32.874，17.899，11.390；P<0.05）。出血组ICU时间、术后住院时间中位数分别为2（0，4）、22（17，34）d，明显长于未出血组的1（0，2）、16（14，19）d（Z=2.014，4.005；P<0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示，TEG测定凝血形成时间K和Plt是远端胆管癌患者PD术后出血的独立影响因素（OR=0.193，0.298；P<0.05），以两者建立的模型预测术后出血的ROC曲线下面积为0.742（95%CI：0.637~0.847）。

结论

远端胆管癌PD术后出血患者容易出现胰瘘、胃排空障碍、早期死亡，基于术前TEG测定及Plt构建模型对术后出血有一定的预测价值。

关键词: 胆管肿瘤, 胰十二指肠切除术, 出血, 血栓弹力图
Objective

To investigate the clinical features of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who developed bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and assess the predictive value of thromboelastography (TEG) in postoperative bleeding.

Methods

Clinical data of 162 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent PD in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2016 to August 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 100 patients were male and 62 female, aged from 39 to 78 years, with a median age of 64 years. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. All patients were divided into the bleeding group (n=29) and non-bleeding group (n=133) according to whether postoperative bleeding occurred. Perioperative conditions between two groups were compared by rank-sum test or Chi-square test. Patients' tumor markers, coagulation function and TEG-related indexes were included in the analysis of influencing factors of postoperative bleeding. The independent influencing factors of postoperative bleeding were identified by univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses. Logistic regression model was established, and predictive value of this model was evaluated by ROC curve.

Results

Pancreatic fistula, gastric emptying disturbance and 90-d mortality occurred in 19, 25 and 5 cases in the bleeding group, whereas 79, 57 and 3 cases in the non-bleeding group, significant differences were observed between two groups (χ2=32.874, 17.899, 11.390; P<0.05). In the bleeding group, the median length of ICU stay and length of postoperative hospital stay were 2(0, 4) d and 22(17, 34) d, significantly longer than 1(0, 2) d and 16(14, 19) din the non-bleeding group (Z=2.014, 4.005; P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that coagulation time K and Plt measured by TEG were the independent influencing factors of bleeding after PD in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (OR=0.193, 0.298; P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve of the model based on these two factors in predicting postoperative bleeding was 0.742 (95%CI:0.637-0.847).

Conclusions

Patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma presenting with postoperative bleeding after PD are prone to pancreatic fistula, gastric emptying disorder and early death. The prediction model based on preoperative TEG measurement and Plt yields certain predictive value for postoperative bleeding.

Key words: Bile duct neoplasms, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Hemorrhage, Thrombelastography
表1 远端胆管癌PD术后出血患者的临床病理学特征
参数 出血组 未出血组 统计值 P值
年龄(岁，±s) 62±10 63±10 t=-0.081 0.777
男性(例) 17 83 χ2=0.144 0.704
BMI[kg/m2，M(QR)] 21(5) 23(5) Z=-1.278 0.201
糖尿病(例) 3 18 χ2=0.215 0.643
吸烟(例) 12 38 χ2=1.830 0.176
饮酒(例) 3 16 χ2=0.065 0.798
AFP[μg/L，M(QR)] 2.7(1.4) 3.1(1.8) Z=-1.355 0.175
CEA[μg/L，M(QR)] 2.3(2.6) 3.2(2.6) Z=-1.327 0.184
CA125[kU/L，M(QR)] 17.8(10.1) 16.0(10.9) Z=1.137 0.421
CA19-9[kU/L，M(QR)] 82(110) 100(349) Z=-0.805 0.256
TNM分期(例) 29 133 χ2=0.216 0.643
Ⅰ期 9 26
Ⅱ期 13 82
Ⅲ期 7 25
手术时间[min，M(QR)] 330(157) 330(131) Z=0.791 0.429
术中出血量[ml，M(QR)] 300(200) 400(400) Z=-0.679 0.497
胰瘘(例) 19 79 χ2=32.874 0.002
生化胰瘘 3 45
B级胰瘘 10 34
C级胰瘘 6 0
胆漏(例) 1 1 χ2=1.420 0.236
胃排空障碍(例) 25 57 χ2=17.899 <0.001
术后住院时间[d，M(QR)] 22(17) 16(5) Z=4.005 <0.001
ICU时间[d，M(QR)] 2(4) 1(2) Z=2.014 0.044
30 d内再住院(例) 0 2 - 0.509
90 d死亡(例) 5 3 χ2=11.390 0.001
表2 远端胆管癌患者PD术后出血的Logistic回归分析
指标 单因素分析 多因素分析
OR 95%CI P OR 95%CI P
R (min) 0.291 0.104~0.816 0.019 0.477 0.134~1.700 0.351
K (min) 0.387 0.159~0.945 0.037 0.193 0.054~0.694 0.012
α(°) 0.346 0.043~2.775 0.318
MA (mm) 0.659 0.285~1.521 0.328
Plt (×109/L) 0.312 0.136~0.719 0.006 0.298 0.092~0.967 0.044
FIB (g/L) 0.542 0.117~2.497 0.432
FDP (mg/L) 0.381 0.162~0.869 0.028 0.507 0.134~1.916 0.594
DD (mg/L) 0.361 0.154~0.845 0.019 0.677 0.185~2.165 0.494
AFP (μg/L) 0.393 0.160~0.968 0.042 0.632 0.185~2.165 0.112
CEA (μg/L) 0.353 0.148~0.840 0.019 0.572 0.188~1.744 0.128
CA125 (kU/L) 0.349 0.143~0.849 0.020 0.613 0.190~1.980 0.393
CA19-9(kU/L) 0.247 0.070~0.868 0.029 0.137 0.016~1.196 0.069
图1 Logistic回归模型预测远端胆管癌患者PD术后出血的ROC曲线注：PD为胰十二指肠切除术
表3 预测远端胆管癌患者PD术后出血的Logistic回归模型参数
参数 b SE（b） Wald χ2 P OR 95%CI
K -1.333 0.502 7.069 0.008 0.264 0.099~0.704
Plt -1.503 0.483 9.702 0.002 0.222 0.086~0.573
常量 0.036 0.443 0.007 0.935 1.037 -
[1]
Brindley PJ, Bachini M, Ilyas SI, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2021, 7(1):65.
[2]
Sarantis P, Tzanetatou ED, Ioakeimidou E, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: the role of genetic and epigenetic factors; current and prospective treatment with checkpoint inhibitors and immunotherapy[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(12):13246-13260.
[3]
中国抗癌协会. 远端胆管癌规范化诊治专家共识(2017)[J]. 中华肝胆外科杂志, 2018, 24(1):1-8.
[4]
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition[J]. Surgery, 2007, 142(1):20-25.
[5]
Darnis B, Lebeau R, Chopin-Laly X, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398(3):441-448.
[6]
Bolliger D, Tanaka KA. Roles of thrombelastography and thromboelastometry for patient blood management in cardiac surgery[J]. Transfus Med Rev, 2013, 27(4):213-220.
[7]
Dixon A, Underwood S, Schreiber M. Implementing thrombelastography: experiences from a level I trauma institution[J]. Transfusion, 2020, 60 Suppl 6:S29-32.
[8]
Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Saucedo JF, et al. Bivalirudin and clopidogrel with and without eptifibatide for elective stenting: effects on platelet function, thrombelastographic indexes, and their relation to periprocedural infarction results of the CLEAR PLATELETS-2 (clopidogrel with eptifibatide to arrest the reactivity of platelets) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 53(8):648-657.
[9]
Lancé MD. A general review of major global coagulation assays: thrombelastography, thrombin generation test and clot waveform analysis[J]. Thromb J, 2015, 13:1.
[10]
陈丹磊, 邵成浩. 远端胆管癌微创治疗的争议与技术要点[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(2):120-123.
[11]
Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9935):2168-2179.
[12]
吕少诚, 张志华, 李立新, 等. 远端胆管癌手术预后评价及相关危险因素分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2020, 47(6):369-373, f3.
[13]
Koukoutsis I, Bellagamba R, Morris-Stiff G, et al. Haemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the importance of sentinel bleed[J]. Dig Surg, 2006, 23(4):224-228.
[14]
Balachandran P, Sikora SS, Raghavendra Rao RV, et al. Haemorrhagic complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2004, 74(11):945-950.
[15]
Tien YW, Lee PH, Yang CY, et al. Risk factors of massive bleeding related to pancreatic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2005, 201(4):554-559.
[16]
Makowiec F, Riediger H, Euringer W, et al. Management of delayed visceral arterial bleeding after pancreatic head resection[J].J Gastrointest Surg, 2005, 9(9):1293-1299.
[17]
de Castro SM, Kuhlmann KF, Busch OR, et al. Delayed massive hemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery: embolization or surgery?[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 241(1):85-91.
[18]
Izumo W, Higuchi R, Yazawa T, et al. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2019, 404(8):967-974.
[19]
王利民, 王平, 刘善凤, 等. 血栓弹力图评估胰腺癌患者凝血功能状态及鉴别诊断的应用[J]. 临床血液学杂志, 2021, 34(4):225-228.
[20]
骆高健, 陈建峰, 陈颢, 等. 梗阻性黄疸患者胰十二指肠切除术围手术期凝血功能改变和术后并发症关系研究[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2017, 27(1):31-33.
[21]
Toukh M, Siemens DR, Black A, et al. Thromboelastography identifies hypercoagulablilty and predicts thromboembolic complications in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Thromb Res, 2014, 133(1):88-95.
[1] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[4] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[5] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[6] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[7] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[8] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
[9] 邹勇, 顾应江, 丁昊, 杨呈浩, 陈岷辉, 蔡昱. 基于Nrf2/HO-1及NF-κB信号通路探讨葛根素对大鼠脑出血后早期炎症反应及氧化应激反应的影响[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 271-277.
[10] 运陌, 李茂芳, 王浩, 刘东远. 微创穿刺引流联合吡拉西坦、乌拉地尔治疗基底节区高血压性脑出血的临床研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 278-285.
[11] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[12] 秦维, 王丹, 孙玉, 霍玉玲, 祝素平, 郑艳丽, 薛瑞. 血清层粘连蛋白、Ⅳ型胶原蛋白对代偿期肝硬化食管胃静脉曲张出血的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 447-451.
[13] 高显奎, 赵太云, 陆兴俊, 张洪领, 房修罗, 闫碧春, 王胤, 王永翠, 刘苗苗, 冉若男. 内镜电凝止血与组织胶注射治疗上消化道溃疡伴出血的疗效观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 452-455.
[14] 张雯, 宋牡丹, 邓雪婷, 张云. 强化营养支持辅助奥曲肽治疗肝硬化合并食管胃底静脉曲张破裂出血的疗效及再出血危险因素[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 456-460.
[15] 丁亚梅, 田野, 钱进, 陈梅, 季鸿颖. 良性胃溃疡出血患者内镜治疗术后再出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 322-325.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号