切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 331 -335. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.03.016

临床研究

消化道重建术后ERCP安全性和疗效分析
范清泉1, 宋晓玲1, 翁明哲1, 顾钧2,()   
  1. 1. 200093 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科
    2. 200093 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科;202150 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-06-10
  • 通信作者: 顾钧
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项计划(201940224)

Safety and efficacy of ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction

Qingquan Fan1, Xiaoling Song1, Mingzhe Weng1, Jun Gu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200093, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200093, China; Department of General Surgery, Chongming Branch of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 202150, China
  • Received:2023-01-03 Published:2023-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jun Gu
引用本文:

范清泉, 宋晓玲, 翁明哲, 顾钧. 消化道重建术后ERCP安全性和疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 331-335.

Qingquan Fan, Xiaoling Song, Mingzhe Weng, Jun Gu. Safety and efficacy of ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 331-335.

目的

探讨消化道重建术后行ERCP治疗的安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日在上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院接受ERCP治疗的154例消化道重建术后患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男94例,女60例;年龄6~91岁,中位年龄58岁。消化道重建术式包括Whipple术Child吻合48例,Roux-en-Y术60例,毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术46例。由经验丰富医师采用十二指肠侧视镜及单气囊小肠镜辅助行ERCP。观察ERCP操作时间、成功率、治疗成功率、术后并发症发生率等。3组ERCP操作时间比较采用秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

本组154例患者累计进行220次ERCP操作,成功完成胆、胰管插管183次。ERCP操作成功率为83.2%(183/220),临床治疗成功率为80.5%(177/220)。其中Whipple术后组、Roux-en-Y术后组、毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术后组ERCP插管成功率分别为86%(66/77)、86%(73/85)、76%(44/58),临床治疗成功率分别为83%(64/77)、82%(70/85)、74%(43/58),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.276,2.014;P>0.05)。3组ERCP操作时间中位数分别为100(60)、130(93)、74(60)min,差异有统计学意义(H=30.463,P<0.05)。术后胰腺炎6例,均为轻型,经禁食、补液等对症治疗后好转出院。Whipple术后组并发症发生率为1%(1/77),Roux-en-Y术后组为1%(1/85),毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术后组为12%(7/58)。

结论

消化道重建术后行ERCP治疗是安全、有效的,须严格把握手术适应证,术前充分准备,由经验丰富的医师在团队协作下进行。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction.

Methods

Clinical data of 154 patients who underwent ERCP in Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 94 patients were male and 60 female, aged from 6 to 91 years, witha median age of 58 years. The digestive tract reconstruction techniques included Whipple-Child reconstruction in 48 cases, Roux-en-Y reconstruction in 60, and BillrothⅡsubtotal gastrectomy in 46, respectively. ERCP was performed using lateral-viewing duodenoscope and single-balloon enteroscopy by experienced surgeons. The operation time, success rate, treatment success rate and postoperative complications of ERCP were observed. The operation time of ERCP among 3 groups was compared by rank-sum test. The rate comparison was conducted by Chi-square test.

Results

154 patients underwent 220 times of ERCP cumulatively, and 183 times of intubation of bile duct and pancreatic duct were successfully completed. The success rate of ERCP was 83.2%(183/220), and the clinical treatment success rate was 80.5%(177/220). The success rates of ERCP intubation after Whipple-Child reconstruction, Roux-en-Y reconstruction and BillrothⅡsubtotal gastrectomy were 86%(66/77), 86%(73/85) and 76%(44/58), respectively, and the clinical treatment success rates were 83%(64/77), 82%(70/85) and 74%(43/58), where no significant differences were observed among3 groups (χ2=2.276, 2.014; P>0.05). The median operation time of ERCP in 3 groups was 100(60), 130(93) and 74(60) min, respectively, and significant differences were observed (H=30.463, P<0.05). Postoperative mild pancreatitis occurred in 6 patients, who were discharged after symptomatic treatments, such as fasting and fluid replacement, etc. The incidence of postoperative complications was 1%(1/77) in the Whipple-Child reconstruction group, 1%(1/85) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction group and 12%(7/58) in BillrothⅡ subtotal gastrectomy group.

Conclusions

It is safe and efficacious to perform ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction. It is necessary to strictly review the surgical indications, make full preparations before ERCP, and should be carried out by experienced surgeons under teamwork.

图1 不同消化道重建方式行ERCP术中图注:a、b、c分别为Whipple术后、Roux-en-Y术后和毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术后行ERCP
图2 消化道重建术后患者行ERCP治疗流程图注:n为例次
表1 消化道重建术后ERCP患者一般情况(例次)
表2 三种消化道重建术后患者行ERCP术情况
[1]
Cotton PB. Cannulation of the papilla of Vater by endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)[J]. Gut, 1972, 13(12):1014-1025.
[2]
Cotton PB, Beales JS. Clinical relevance of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography[J]. Gut, 1972, 13(10):851.
[3]
李鹏, 王拥军, 王文海. 中国ERCP指南(2018版)[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(11):777-813.
[4]
Krutsri C, Kida M, Yamauchi H, et al. Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(26):3313-3333.
[5]
Takenaka M, Minaga K, Kamata K, et al. Efficacy of a modified double-guidewire technique using an uneven double lumen cannula (uneven method) in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy (with video)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(3):1432-1441.
[6]
Shah RJ, Smolkin M, Yen R, et al. A multicenter, U.S. experience of single-balloon, double-balloon, and rotational overtube-assisted enteroscopy ERCP in patients with surgically altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy (with video)[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 77(4):593-600.
[7]
翁昊, 王雪峰. 消化道重建术后内镜逆行胰胆管造影的临床应用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(4):282-287.
[8]
吴文广, 张文杰, 顾钧, 等. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗胰十二指肠切除术后远期并发症的结果分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(11):833-836.
[9]
Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, et al. Gastric cancer[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10251):635-648.
[10]
刘颖斌, 王建伟, 方河清, 等. 捆绑式胰肠吻合术在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2004, 84(12):997-999.
[11]
Inamdar S, Slattery E, Sejpal DV, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 82(1):9-19.
[12]
曹雪艳, 王飞, 张秀华, 等. ERCP在消化道重建术后胆胰疾病中的应用进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(8):508-513.
[13]
Coşkun O, Ödemiş B. A comparative study of side-viewing duodenoscope and forward-viewing gastroscope to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with BillrothⅡ gastrectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(8):4222-4230.
[14]
Wang F, Xu B, Li Q, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: one single center's experience[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(52):e5743.
[15]
Sirin G, Hulagu S. Double balloon enteroscopy improves ERCP success in patients with modified small bowel anatomy[J]. North Clin Istanb, 2020, 7(2):131-139.
[16]
Kanno Y, Ohira T, Kozakai F, et al. Accurate endoscopic identification of the afferent limb at the Y anastomosis using the fold disruption sign after gastric resection with Roux-en-Y reconstruction[J]. Dig Endosc, 2022, 34(1):238-243.
[17]
Niwa Y, Nakamura M, Kawashima H, et al. Accuracy of carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using double-balloon endoscopy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(42):6669-6678.
[18]
Obata T, Tsutsumi K, Kato H, et al. Balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of common bile duct stones in patients with Roux-en-Y gastrectomy: outcomes and factors affecting complete stone extraction[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(15):3314.
[19]
Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 81(1):143-149, e9.
[20]
张卓. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后并发症发生的现状和预防策略[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(4):290-293.
[21]
白雪. 两种胆总管结石取石术的卫生经济学评估——ERCP和传统开腹术比较[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2011.
[1] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[2] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[3] 李子禹, 王胤奎. 腹腔镜全胃切除术后消化道重建术式选择与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 364-367.
[4] 苏向前, 宋同鲲, 徐凯. 腹腔镜远端胃切除术后消化道重建术式选择与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 368-371.
[5] 潘玉霞, 魏曼莉, 魏金鑫, 董云生. SPLT联合间置空肠双通道吻合在腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的近期疗效和生活质量研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 380-384.
[6] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[7] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[8] 刘骏, 朱霁, 殷骏. 右美托咪定对腹股沟疝手术麻醉效果及安全性的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 570-573.
[9] 王红敏, 谢云波, 王彦虎, 王福生. 间充质干细胞治疗新冠病毒感染的临床研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 247-256.
[10] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[11] 娜荷雅, 朱丹. 红光疗法在儿童近视眼防控中的研究进展[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 252-256.
[12] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[13] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 冯健, 安峰铎, 李强, 谈明坤, 赵娜, 冷建军. 局部晚期右半结肠癌行结肠癌根治联合胰十二指肠切除术疗效分析:附5例报告[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 666-670.
[14] 曹文玺, 陈箫, 竺来法, 周永平. 尼妥珠单抗联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗胰腺癌的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 409-413.
[15] 梁君, 褚晨宇, 孙凤艳, 袁仪浪, 周曦, 王卫东. 胸壁完全植入式静脉输液港术中隧道针逆向穿刺的可行性和安全性[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 310-313.
阅读次数
全文


摘要