切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 331 -335. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-3232.2023.03.016

临床研究

消化道重建术后ERCP安全性和疗效分析
范清泉1, 宋晓玲1, 翁明哲1, 顾钧2,()   
  1. 1. 200093 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科
    2. 200093 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院普通外科;202150 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-06-10
  • 通信作者: 顾钧
  • 基金资助:
    上海市卫生健康委员会卫生行业临床研究专项计划(201940224)

Safety and efficacy of ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction

Qingquan Fan1, Xiaoling Song1, Mingzhe Weng1, Jun Gu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200093, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200093, China; Department of General Surgery, Chongming Branch of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 202150, China
  • Received:2023-01-03 Published:2023-06-10
  • Corresponding author: Jun Gu
引用本文:

范清泉, 宋晓玲, 翁明哲, 顾钧. 消化道重建术后ERCP安全性和疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 331-335.

Qingquan Fan, Xiaoling Song, Mingzhe Weng, Jun Gu. Safety and efficacy of ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 331-335.

目的

探讨消化道重建术后行ERCP治疗的安全性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日在上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院接受ERCP治疗的154例消化道重建术后患者临床资料。患者均签署知情同意书,符合医学伦理学规定。其中男94例,女60例;年龄6~91岁,中位年龄58岁。消化道重建术式包括Whipple术Child吻合48例,Roux-en-Y术60例,毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术46例。由经验丰富医师采用十二指肠侧视镜及单气囊小肠镜辅助行ERCP。观察ERCP操作时间、成功率、治疗成功率、术后并发症发生率等。3组ERCP操作时间比较采用秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

本组154例患者累计进行220次ERCP操作,成功完成胆、胰管插管183次。ERCP操作成功率为83.2%(183/220),临床治疗成功率为80.5%(177/220)。其中Whipple术后组、Roux-en-Y术后组、毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术后组ERCP插管成功率分别为86%(66/77)、86%(73/85)、76%(44/58),临床治疗成功率分别为83%(64/77)、82%(70/85)、74%(43/58),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.276,2.014;P>0.05)。3组ERCP操作时间中位数分别为100(60)、130(93)、74(60)min,差异有统计学意义(H=30.463,P<0.05)。术后胰腺炎6例,均为轻型,经禁食、补液等对症治疗后好转出院。Whipple术后组并发症发生率为1%(1/77),Roux-en-Y术后组为1%(1/85),毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术后组为12%(7/58)。

结论

消化道重建术后行ERCP治疗是安全、有效的,须严格把握手术适应证,术前充分准备,由经验丰富的医师在团队协作下进行。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction.

Methods

Clinical data of 154 patients who underwent ERCP in Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The informed consents of all patients were obtained and the local ethical committee approval was received. Among them, 94 patients were male and 60 female, aged from 6 to 91 years, witha median age of 58 years. The digestive tract reconstruction techniques included Whipple-Child reconstruction in 48 cases, Roux-en-Y reconstruction in 60, and BillrothⅡsubtotal gastrectomy in 46, respectively. ERCP was performed using lateral-viewing duodenoscope and single-balloon enteroscopy by experienced surgeons. The operation time, success rate, treatment success rate and postoperative complications of ERCP were observed. The operation time of ERCP among 3 groups was compared by rank-sum test. The rate comparison was conducted by Chi-square test.

Results

154 patients underwent 220 times of ERCP cumulatively, and 183 times of intubation of bile duct and pancreatic duct were successfully completed. The success rate of ERCP was 83.2%(183/220), and the clinical treatment success rate was 80.5%(177/220). The success rates of ERCP intubation after Whipple-Child reconstruction, Roux-en-Y reconstruction and BillrothⅡsubtotal gastrectomy were 86%(66/77), 86%(73/85) and 76%(44/58), respectively, and the clinical treatment success rates were 83%(64/77), 82%(70/85) and 74%(43/58), where no significant differences were observed among3 groups (χ2=2.276, 2.014; P>0.05). The median operation time of ERCP in 3 groups was 100(60), 130(93) and 74(60) min, respectively, and significant differences were observed (H=30.463, P<0.05). Postoperative mild pancreatitis occurred in 6 patients, who were discharged after symptomatic treatments, such as fasting and fluid replacement, etc. The incidence of postoperative complications was 1%(1/77) in the Whipple-Child reconstruction group, 1%(1/85) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction group and 12%(7/58) in BillrothⅡ subtotal gastrectomy group.

Conclusions

It is safe and efficacious to perform ERCP after digestive tract reconstruction. It is necessary to strictly review the surgical indications, make full preparations before ERCP, and should be carried out by experienced surgeons under teamwork.

图1 不同消化道重建方式行ERCP术中图注:a、b、c分别为Whipple术后、Roux-en-Y术后和毕Ⅱ式胃大部分切除术后行ERCP
图2 消化道重建术后患者行ERCP治疗流程图注:n为例次
表1 消化道重建术后ERCP患者一般情况(例次)
表2 三种消化道重建术后患者行ERCP术情况
[1]
Cotton PB. Cannulation of the papilla of Vater by endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)[J]. Gut, 1972, 13(12):1014-1025.
[2]
Cotton PB, Beales JS. Clinical relevance of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography[J]. Gut, 1972, 13(10):851.
[3]
李鹏, 王拥军, 王文海. 中国ERCP指南(2018版)[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2018, 35(11):777-813.
[4]
Krutsri C, Kida M, Yamauchi H, et al. Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(26):3313-3333.
[5]
Takenaka M, Minaga K, Kamata K, et al. Efficacy of a modified double-guidewire technique using an uneven double lumen cannula (uneven method) in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy (with video)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(3):1432-1441.
[6]
Shah RJ, Smolkin M, Yen R, et al. A multicenter, U.S. experience of single-balloon, double-balloon, and rotational overtube-assisted enteroscopy ERCP in patients with surgically altered pancreaticobiliary anatomy (with video)[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 77(4):593-600.
[7]
翁昊, 王雪峰. 消化道重建术后内镜逆行胰胆管造影的临床应用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(4):282-287.
[8]
吴文广, 张文杰, 顾钧, 等. 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影治疗胰十二指肠切除术后远期并发症的结果分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(11):833-836.
[9]
Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, et al. Gastric cancer[J]. Lancet, 2020, 396(10251):635-648.
[10]
刘颖斌, 王建伟, 方河清, 等. 捆绑式胰肠吻合术在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2004, 84(12):997-999.
[11]
Inamdar S, Slattery E, Sejpal DV, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in patients with surgically altered GI anatomy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 82(1):9-19.
[12]
曹雪艳, 王飞, 张秀华, 等. ERCP在消化道重建术后胆胰疾病中的应用进展[J]. 肝胆胰外科杂志, 2021, 33(8):508-513.
[13]
Coşkun O, Ödemiş B. A comparative study of side-viewing duodenoscope and forward-viewing gastroscope to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with BillrothⅡ gastrectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(8):4222-4230.
[14]
Wang F, Xu B, Li Q, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: one single center's experience[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(52):e5743.
[15]
Sirin G, Hulagu S. Double balloon enteroscopy improves ERCP success in patients with modified small bowel anatomy[J]. North Clin Istanb, 2020, 7(2):131-139.
[16]
Kanno Y, Ohira T, Kozakai F, et al. Accurate endoscopic identification of the afferent limb at the Y anastomosis using the fold disruption sign after gastric resection with Roux-en-Y reconstruction[J]. Dig Endosc, 2022, 34(1):238-243.
[17]
Niwa Y, Nakamura M, Kawashima H, et al. Accuracy of carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using double-balloon endoscopy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2020, 26(42):6669-6678.
[18]
Obata T, Tsutsumi K, Kato H, et al. Balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of common bile duct stones in patients with Roux-en-Y gastrectomy: outcomes and factors affecting complete stone extraction[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(15):3314.
[19]
Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2015, 81(1):143-149, e9.
[20]
张卓. 内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后并发症发生的现状和预防策略[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(4):290-293.
[21]
白雪. 两种胆总管结石取石术的卫生经济学评估——ERCP和传统开腹术比较[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2011.
[1] 张启龙, 柳亿, 卢会丽, 罗慧, 李成林, 王菁, 王辉. 奥妥珠单抗治疗磷脂酶A2受体相关膜性肾病的疗效与安全性:单中心回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 379-384.
[2] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[3] 蒋敏, 刘馨竹, 李大伟, 冯柏塨, 申传安. 点阵CO2激光联合其他非手术方式治疗痤疮瘢痕有效性的网状荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 429-439.
[4] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析:附5例报告(附视频)[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[5] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[6] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[7] 陈燕. LCBDE和ERCP+EST治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 385-388.
[8] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[9] 韦雅丽, 范利杰. 术前右美托咪定滴鼻在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 446-450.
[10] 黄建朋, 邹建强, 宗华. 肝移植术后腹壁疝诊治初步经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 471-473.
[11] 王鹏, 邵欣欣, 胡海涛, 田艳涛, 钟宇新. 改良MOBS 吻合法在全腹腔镜近端胃大部分切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 267-270.
[12] 黄金鑫, 陈佳骏, 王旋, 曲岩, 张晞文, 李甫. ERCP在胆胰合流异常患者诊治中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 699-704.
[13] 顾一帆, 潘璐. 关注近视眼防控措施及其面临的形势[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 129-133.
[14] 曹猛, 郭杰东, 朱灿, 许腾, 樊瑞智, 江涛, 宋军, 徐溢新. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中顺蠕动侧侧吻合的有效性及安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 315-319.
[15] 陶金华, 陈珊珊, 陈晓四. 阿帕替尼联合替吉奥治疗晚期食管癌的疗效与安全性影响因素评价[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 325-329.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?